No problem and yes I did. Amsoil z rod 10w40, amsoil XL 10w40, and amsoil ss 0w40Thanks for sharing. Did you get other Amsoil tested (based on your comment)?
Additive pack doesn't look like it would be an SP compatible which some folks here don't mind.
Someone's gonna take that bait and bring up hpl 0w-40... Might just be me actuallyThis looks like an old school fill SAPS SN motor oil. It's AMSOIL, so I wouldn't have a problem using it, probably the best 0W-40.
Who makes that hpl 0w-40?Someone's gonna take that bait and bring up hpl 0w-40... Might just be me actually
But Amsoil is great stuff, just not very lspi safe with that detergent pack in applicable engines. Many off the shelf 0/5w-40 are toned down now.
They might have a good reason for the high calcium formulation, but they're recommending it for applications that might require an LSPI-friendly oil, like MB 229.5, and they really shouldn't be.Definitely not with the calcium levels. Kinda surprised they didn’t offset it with magnesium to be sp rated friendly. I’m sure they have their reasons for it.
I said the same thing on the Facebook group where he also posted this VOAEster free by the looks of the oxidation.
That's a good thing, right? Oxidation is supposed to be as low as possible. I remember about vegetable oil during a coocking class I toulk ages ago. If oxidation is bad for cooking oil, I can't imagine it being good for engine oil.Ester free by the looks of the oxidation.
Where is the oxidation seen?Ester free by the looks of the oxidation.
It's a 40 grade therefore the API limits don't apply.Thanks for sharing. Did you get other Amsoil tested (based on your comment)?
Additive pack doesn't look like it would be an SP compatible which some folks here don't mind.
There are Euro's that are SP compatible & I was just distinguishing this didn't seem to be the case on this particular oil. Some folks may want SP Euro while others don't. Should be some SP Euro 40 grade oils on the market that add packs would look a bit different. I'm using 5w-40 Mobil FS that "Meets" SP for example. We have options.It's a 40 grade therefore the API limits don't apply.
Esters are made by reacting acid with alcohol. Alcohols have oxygen in them and the oxygen is also in esters. It’s incorrect to think of alcohol and the ester that gets created as being oxidized, in the same way as an ester that gets oxidized naturally later in its life. The oxidation test detects the oxygen in the ester. The change in the oxidation result from VOA to UOA is what matters, since that truly does indicate how much unwanted oxidation has occurred.That's a good thing, right? Oxidation is supposed to be as low as possible. I remember about vegetable oil during a coocking class I toulk ages ago. If oxidation is bad for cooking oil, I can't imagine it being good for engine oil.
Under Fluid Properties, at the far right of the report. Just to the right of the Base Number.Where is the oxidation seen?
+1. I know M1 FS states "meets the performance requirements" of SP. Iirc the allowance for higher phosphorus levels is 40 grade as the reason for this.There are Euro's that are SP compatible & I was just distinguishing this didn't seem to be the case on this particular oil. Some folks may want SP Euro while others don't. Should be some SP Euro 40 grade oils on the market that add packs would look a bit different. I'm using 5w-40 Mobil FS that "Meets" SP for example. We have options.![]()
I’m curious about that as well. Wondering why. Even the off the shelf euro oils have dropped significantly in oxidation value. As we know Valvoline restore and protect has a very low oxidation value however cleans the engine very well and doesn’t show up at all on the tests. I’m curious if theirs new base oils that don’t show and provide better results. I don’t see a reason why amsoil would step back always going above and beyond for their oils.It's interesting that some of the newer European oils are doing away with esters, at least per virgin analysis. Any reason for this? I've seen it mentioned in patents of using "cleaning booster", whatever that is..... Mobil 1 ESP 5w30, as well as all Mobil 1 Triple grades including FS 0w40 now have a virgin oxidation of <10.
If you look at some of the highest priced oils on the market they usually have a group V common denominator (POE/AN/Diester).
I wonder if esters are being replaced with newer additives.
Young adds: "Some elements of the chemical composition of our new engine oil are a departure from what we would normally formulate a product with.
"What was a long shot a few years ago - a vision of a low ash, high temperature, low friction engine oil that incorporates bio-based components became a reality this year, thanks to the efforts of our whole team, in collaboration with Honda and Red Bull.
That sounds right.+1. I know M1 FS states "meets the performance requirements" of SP. Iirc the allowance for higher phosphorus levels is 40 grade as the reason for this.
It does look like the add pack is preventing the 5w-30 FS from being API SP & they are only saying "ETR". However, the 5w-30 ESP seems to claim SP. That would make sense since it has lower Ph in the ESP. What I find a bit odd is the additive for the 0w-30 ESP is 800 Ph & 900 Zn. You'd think that would get the SP & not ETR. It should have a similar add pack to the 5w-30 ESP.The FS in 30 grade I think says same thing. ESP might actually be SP.