Viscosity Grade recommendation for Death Valley

It takes horsepower to make torque. Compression ignites diesel. That’s where that pressure come in ya see what I’m getting at here.
actually, horsepower is just an expression for the speeds at which a device produces torque.

1 hp= 550 lbs feet per second so without torque you have no horsepower.. or Horsepower (HP) = (Torque × Speed)/5252
 
Last edited:
actually, horsepower is just an expression for how the speeds at which a device produces torque.

1 hp= 550 lbs feet per second so without torque you have no horsepower.. or Horsepower (HP) = (Torque × Speed)/5252
Look boss man, we are keeping it simple simple. No RPM and all that jazz. Just the basic what makes what. Takes horsepower to make torque.
 
main difference between an air compressor and a diesel engine is that the diesel tries to contain compression whereas the air compressor tries to build pressure and then release it into a container... one thing for sure is they both create alot of heat. anywthing with a low auto ignition temperature should ignite.. only advice I have is make sure you wear protective clothing and have a fire extinguisher handy. :)
 
Unless your cooling system has problem, the coolant is regulated at around thermostat temperature. I think you probably can go from a 0wXX oil to a 10wXX oil if the XX is the same.
 
This thread taught me that I have not appreciated the rise in temps in bearings due to RPMs. I always thought the rise in oil temps was primarily due to combustion heat and oil interacting with the resultant "heat sink" in the chamber walls and pistons. I came to my old (incorrect) conclusion based upon how easy it is to turn a crankshaft by hand, surely the friction I felt couldn't create much heat....but that's only a few RPMs. Very different from a running engine.

Which brings me to an observation: My B48 engine runs at oh-so-low RPMs (it barely gets to 2000 RPM unless you encourage it to do so) for a 4 banger putting out over 300 HP and over 300 ft/lb of Torque. It's spec'd for 0w20. Therefore, as long as the RPMs are kept low, perhaps that 0w20 is sufficient for protection since the oil temps in the bearings stay relatively low. It's only those 4000+ RPM runs that really heat the oil.

I was already doing the reasonable thing by bumping up to 0w30, even if it was for the wrong reason! Now I know. Thanks for the education.
 
Look boss man, we are keeping it simple simple. No RPM and all that jazz. Just the basic what makes what. Takes horsepower to make torque.
problem for you is it isn't keeping it simple but sounding like a simpleton... ... it takes rotation speed and the torque produced at that speed of rotation to derive a horsepower calculation. 1000 pounds feet of torque with no rotation is zero horsepower.. 1 ft lb of torque at 5252 rpm is 1 horsepower.. 2 ft lbs of torque spinning at 2626 rpm is still 1 horsepower... 4 lbs feet of torque at 1313 rpm is still 1 horsepower... but zero lbs ft of torque at 10,000 rpm is still zero horsepower. try the math sometime..
 
This thread taught me that I have not appreciated the rise in temps in bearings due to RPMs. I always thought the rise in oil temps was primarily due to combustion heat and oil interacting with the resultant "heat sink" in the chamber walls and pistons. I came to my old (incorrect) conclusion based upon how easy it is to turn a crankshaft by hand, surely the friction I felt couldn't create much heat....but that's only a few RPMs. Very different from a running engine.

Which brings me to an observation: My B48 engine runs at oh-so-low RPMs (it barely gets to 2000 RPM unless you encourage it to do so) for a 4 banger putting out over 300 HP and over 300 ft/lb of Torque. It's spec'd for 0w20. Therefore, as long as the RPMs are kept low, perhaps that 0w20 is sufficient for protection since the oil temps in the bearings stay relatively low. It's only those 4000+ RPM runs that really heat the oil.

I was already doing the reasonable thing by bumping up to 0w30, even if it was for the wrong reason! Now I know. Thanks for the education.
If your driving along at 70 mph turning 1600 rpm if you look at the load on a scanner, it’s going to be under a higher load, than if the engine is turning 2000 rpm at 70mph. The engine isn’t going to be under the same load, it’s going to be under less load with slightly more rpm at the same speed.
 
I came to my old (incorrect) conclusion based upon how easy it is to turn a crankshaft by hand, surely the friction I felt couldn't create much heat....but that's only a few RPMs. Very different from a running engine.
It's not just the journal bearings, but all moving parts that have an oil film between them. The higher the RPM, the more heat is produced from oil film shearing and friction. The differential is a prime example.
 
Other way around. Actually it takes torque and speed at which that torque is produced to make HP. It's defined by the HP equation. Engines create only mechanical torque, and torque times the speed it's produced (RPM) defines the amount of horsepower it makes.
That’s what everyone thinks, that’s a question asked to the techs when I went to the Cummins classes for the ISV5.0 in the titan to get my certs so we could work on them. The question was how many people think torque makes horsepower everyone raised their hand. Reason it came up was bc he was explaining the reason for a V8 diesel instead of I6.
 
That’s what everyone thinks, that’s a question asked to the techs when I went to the Cummins classes for the ISV5.0 in the titan to get my certs so we could work on them. The question was how many people think torque makes horsepower everyone raised their hand. Reason it came up was bc he was explaining the reason for a V8 diesel instead of I6.
As explained, it takes torque at a rotational speed (RPM) to make HP. The HP equation defines it, and it's the only way to make HP. If you have a torque with zero RPM, you have zero HP. It can't be any other way.
 
As explained, it takes torque at a rotational speed (RPM) to make HP. The HP equation defines it, and it's the only way to make HP. If you have a torque with zero RPM, you have zero HP. It can't be any other way.
Well go to Cummins and tell their professor they are wrong. I’m going by what the poor man taught a class of 30 technicians. See this is what I talk about with members. A professor teaches one thing and on here there is a discrepancy. That’s what I was always taught that torque makes horsepower.
 
Well go to Cummins and tell their professor they are wrong. I’m going by what the poor man taught a class of 30 technicians. See this is what I talk about with members. A professor teaches one thing and on here there is a discrepancy. That’s what I was always taught that torque makes horsepower.
No one cares what you heard from some dude teaching a mechanic’s course. Basic Newtonian physics dictates this. High school or college level first semester physics.

Power is work over time. If you don’t do work you can’t have power. In a rotational system, work is torque * angular displacement.
 
Last edited:
It takes horsepower to make torque. Compression ignites diesel. That’s where that pressure come in ya see what I’m getting at here.
Well go to Cummins and tell their professor they are wrong. I’m going by what the poor man taught a class of 30 technicians. See this is what I talk about with members. A professor teaches one thing and on here there is a discrepancy. That’s what I was always taught that torque makes horsepower.
You're saying two opposite things now (see bold).

If that Cummins "professor" is teaching students that "it takes horsepower to make torque", then he's confusing people and needs to teach that engines only create mechanical torque, and that torque times RPM makes HP, per the HP equation. Did he even show and discuss the HP equation and give examples like given earlier by others in this thread?
 
Last edited:
You're say two opposite things now (see bold).

If that Cummings "professor" is teaching students that "it takes horsepower make torque", then he's confusing people and needs to teach that engines only creat mechanical torque, and that torque times RPM makes HP, per the HP equation. Did he even show and discuss the HP equation and give examples like given earlier by others in this thread?
We weren’t there to discuss what you’re talking about. We were there to learn that particular motor and the ins and outs of it. What to look for on a diag, some problems you may run into with this particular engine, how to know if someone tunes them all that good stuff. We didn’t go there to learn about HP and TQ
 
We weren’t there to discuss what you’re talking about. We were there to learn that particular motor and the ins and outs of it. What to look for on a diag, some problems you may run into with this particular engine, how to know if someone tunes them all that good stuff. We didn’t go there to learn about HP and TQ
That’s all well and good, but then why confidently respond when you’re wrong and argue textbook physics?
 
Back
Top Bottom