Valvoline Restore & Protect

Stating the Noack as <15% doesn't mean much as it could be 8% and still be "<15%". The API requirement for Noack is <15%, so they are just listing that and saying it meets the "<15%" Noack requirement. If you call Valvoline they may give the actual Noack number.
I am curious why NOACK, or evaporation loss, is an issue in this application. What am I missing?
 
You say this like it is a bad thing for Valvoline. Or I am misunderstanding your point?
No, not at all. I’m saying it’s totally normal. Look at the post I responded to and the chain of replies. Someone is arguing that it wasn’t Valvoline that came up with this cleaning agent but another lab. And I’m just saying that’s normal. How it works. Valvoline probably funded the lab or contracted them to do work for them.
 
Stating the Noack as <15% doesn't mean much as it could be 8% and still be "<15%". The API requirement for Noack is <15%, so they are just listing that and saying it meets the "<15%" Noack requirement. If you call Valvoline they may give the actual Noack number.
I tried to get more detailed information from Valvoline on their EP oils,they said only what was published, and also Mobil and they too were tight lipped on info. other more less common brands will give or more likely give out better detailed information on their products it seems.
 
It’s very easy to pay a lab and own the intellectual property of what they develop. This is very common in medical research. Drug companies fund research all the time in labs in universities. Anything they develop is owned by the drug company because they paid for the research.
Exactly. It isn't isn't that Valvoline developed the additive. They paid for it.
 
It’s very easy to pay a lab and own the intellectual property of what they develop. This is very common in medical research. Drug companies fund research all the time in labs in universities. Anything they develop is owned by the drug company because they paid for the research.
Exactly. It isn't isn't that Valvoline developed the additive. They paid for it.
Sounded like it was a lab that routinely does work for Valvoline, and most likely R&P uses proprietary ingredients. So doubt other oil companies can pay and get the same additives from the same developer. Valvoline has it locked down.
 
Last edited:
Sounded like it was a lab that does work for Valvoline, and most likely R&P uses proprietary ingredients. So doubt other oil companies can pay and get the same additives from the same developer. Valvoline has it locked down.
Right, but there seems to be an idea on the forum from some members that Valvoline themselves, in Lexington Kentucky, is creating the additive(s). They are not.
 
Right, but there seems to be an idea on the forum from some members that Valvoline themselves, in Lexington Kentucky, is creating the additive(s). They are not.
Regardless of what lab worked with Valvoline to developed the additives, or where the development work was done, they are still proprietary additives only known by and used by Valvoline.
 
Their test labs are in Lexington Kentucky, and they do ASTM Sequence testing on the finished products, as seen in some videos. Their formulation R&D is in India. Maybe it was in Lexington Kentucky a long time ago, but not now. It sounds like Valvoline owns the lab in India.

https://www.valvolineglobal.com/en-in/vlsipl/departments-archive/research-development-lab/

1752383625262.webp
 
As for me, I plan on living vicariously through Glenda W. 😄

Anxiously awaiting the results of G.W's test moving from VRP to ESP 0w-30.

If the results are as I expect, I will follow suit. Been on VRP for 3 OCI's. Likely switch to ESP. Waiting for the resuls🍿from Glenda W.
Agreed ! I’m doing the opposite coming from my current fill of 0W30 ESP to 5W30 VRP (on deck next) .
 
Back
Top Bottom