Welcome and thank you. Now you are speaking my language. Some people here do not believe that we can get over 60 mpg in our Accord hybrid. They say what proof do we have and they do not believe it. Thank you for sharing that you also get over 60 mpg many times. I do believe you because I do get the same.
The only reason I am using this battery is for an experiment. The guy who did it on the forum claimed and showed pictures of his car getting over 67 mpg in over 10,000 miles. So I decided to experiment and see. But my experiment is only while I am in the city driving or driving where the posted highest speed limit is 65 mph.
If I have to go out of town where the posted speed limit is 75 mph, then I will cancel the experiment and re-start it again only when I return back to town and fill up my gas tank again.
Nobody is arguing what you’re getting for MPG. The car is efficient. Agreed.
The claim that you experienced a big increase because of a different 12V battery is the point of contention.
You have discovered the latest in a long line of specious claims - the 100 MPG carburetor, the magnetic fuel alignment device, and the intake “vortex” booster, for example - miracles of efficiency “improvement” that simply made no sense from an engineering or basic physics perspective.
You claim the what - better efficiency - and maybe you see a result. That results has dozens of potential explanations, but you choose to believe that it’s your battery. That’s your belief, and since you haven’t shown how you controlled for all the other variables, it remains belief.
What you cannot prove, and where your explanation falls short, is “how”.
How does this battery take that much load off your engine?
How does it increase your MPG?
Miracle alignment of fuel molecules in the line via magnetic force? Nope, that’s been claimed. Better mixing of fuel and air via a stamped piece of sheetmetal in the intake? Nope, that’s been claimed, too. Secret technology suppressed by big oil? Yeah…claimed, as well.
Which leaves you believing, and claiming, that your 12V charging circuit was responsible for about 5 MPG. Call it the difference between 55 and 60 MPG. Which are your numbers, right? A bump from 55 to 60 MPG?
At 60 MPH, that is a burn difference of 0.08 gallons, give or take, or roughly 10,000 BTU.
So, 10,000 BTU saved in an hour, is a load of 3,000 watts. So, your battery is saving 3,000 watts at 12V - dude that’s 250 AMPS.
You want us all to believe that your new battery takes a consistent 250 fewer amps to charge than the last battery.
You are claiming that the electric use in your car went down by 250 amps on the basis of a battery?
250 amps?
You’re going to have to do better than that.