It's goes back to the customer expectation of what a professional establishment should look like. If you're accustomed to going to a dealership, you are conditioned to have certain expectations about the overall service experience; it's the professional image.I don't really understand why people want a "dealership" experience? I can see why repair shop owners like people who like paying for a dealership experience, as they can make a lot more money that way, but I don't see how its any better for the customer?
I guess if you've got money to burn and equate spending lots of money with "investing" in their car? Get some warm fuzzies by spending some money, and some ego stroking by just telling the service advisor "yes" to anything they suggest? Have some "free" coffee, and never ever get to talk to the tech that worked on your car?
Its a car, you follow the maintenance schedule, and replace stuff that wears out/breaks. Its not complicated. Two guys can run a shop and fix cars pretty well, without the frills or BS. Personally I don't like commissioned service advisors who's job is to sell wallet flushes, or attempts to be guilted/scared into replacing pads and rotors with the over half the pads left...
Independents, especially smaller ones, do not have the same processes and formality that many white collar professionals expect. Digital Multi-Point inspections, digital video inspections, text communication, clean waiting rooms, shuttle service (hey, people have busy lives), etc. Perception of expertise. etc.
But those are also the same folks who have the money to invest into their cars. So now, more established independents are trying to chase after that business -- the wannabe dealerships.