Many smart people on this board but ultimately we need either a confession with physical proof like the stealth planes or these objects need to make themselves known in more concrete ways. Drones and magic shows may explain some of it I suppose but for what end result? Can phalanx system shoot down a drone? Did I get the spelling/weapon's system right?
UFO's and the NAVY
- Thread starter Malo83
- Start date
- Status
A phalanx can smoke about anything it can track - yes they can take out drones.
These objects display speed so great that even our best phased array radars dont fully track them they appear in one place then in another in some cases. These same radars have conducted multiple ballistic missile intercepts with no loss of track.
With the recent announcements from the pentagon (and poeple like Obama) the gig is basically up.
Individual belief has largely been made irrelevant with these.
There is still great debate about where these object originated from.
Their displays of performance aren't duplicable yet.
Aside from landing on the lawn of the white house they've been making themselves present at nuclear installations and apparently Naval groups for a long time- we've just been lied to about it.
We've got about as much chance of taking one down as the Mascho Piro tribe does an F22.
Last edited:
Almost every documented culture has had interaction with non-humans with space vehicles. Going back to the Sumerians. Written in Cuneiform pictographs. Something to think about. There are stories of recovered crashed space vehicles going back to the late 1800's in Northeast New Mexico. Where do you think the word "Skywalker" comes from?
Yeah, there's always stories but you never actually see any actual evidence. Where's the recovered crash space vehicles from the 1800's? Remember three can keep a secret if two are dead is what Ben Franklin said in his day. You just have stories. People are good at telling stories. There's a large section in book stores devoted to various forms of fiction and the most entertaining and highest grossing movies are fiction. No actual proof and no one can claim any kind of actual physical evidence. People leak top secret stuff all the time, they just try and do it anonymously.
There are whole books of stories that some billions of people hold up as evidence/proof of supernatural beings, without any tangible hard proof. I would venture to say the evidence supporting much UFO speculation far exceeds the evidence to support these tomes of belief. I am pretty skeptical in general but now believe there may be some merit in some of the UFO/alien intelligence claims of late. I am ready to alter my stance as scientific methodology will hopefully and eventually get closer to what is factual versus fanciful.
manicrodder
$50 site donor 2022
The X-Files were true??
Here is a plausible and very suspenseful video about what might happen when the aliens inevitably reveal themselves to humanity. Their intentions could shock you.
How close are we?
How close are we?
governments have the innate ability to spin fantasy tales to spare us commoners from truth. these recently disclosed, multiple, corroborated, ufo reports by some of best trained and sophisticated military platforms in human history overtake swamp gas and weather balloon cover stories. there is some there, there.
It is human nature for our perception to fall short, and that shortfall is explained by supernatural phenomena; aliens, gods, whatever.
But there are lots of visual phenomena that appear supernatural because our perception mis-identifies what is being seen (E.g. airplanes flying backwards. Check out Youtube). When the phenomena is short duration, there is no time to reach understanding of the actual situation.
Enter the supernatural explanation.
I don’t accept that the sensors on the airplane, or the perception of the pilots, are infallible. I’ve seen both fail, spectacularly, too many times. It’s a long road, full of dead ends, from “I saw something” to “proof of existence”.
“Non-Newtonian“ is pseudo-scientific hyperbole. Pure jargon. F=MA even when A is huge. That just means the F was really big, or the M was really small. The laws of motion weren’t repealed,
If what was perceived was actually accurate.
But there are lots of visual phenomena that appear supernatural because our perception mis-identifies what is being seen (E.g. airplanes flying backwards. Check out Youtube). When the phenomena is short duration, there is no time to reach understanding of the actual situation.
Enter the supernatural explanation.
I don’t accept that the sensors on the airplane, or the perception of the pilots, are infallible. I’ve seen both fail, spectacularly, too many times. It’s a long road, full of dead ends, from “I saw something” to “proof of existence”.
“Non-Newtonian“ is pseudo-scientific hyperbole. Pure jargon. F=MA even when A is huge. That just means the F was really big, or the M was really small. The laws of motion weren’t repealed,
If what was perceived was actually accurate.
Last edited:
You are falling into the trap that if you repeat something that's not true long enough, eventually people will believe it. Remember, they are claims, but they have no proof.
True enuff. I await more info...........
Jackson_Slugger
$50 Site Donor 2022
Well its out. Disclosure is coming in bits and drips.
https://www.reuters.com/business/ae...ufos-leaves-sightings-unexplained-2021-06-25/
"UAP clearly pose a safety of flight issue and may pose a challenge to U.S. national security," the report stated, adding that the phenomena "probably lack a single explanation."
"The task force focused on phenomena witnessed first-hand by military aviators, with 80 reports involving detection by multiple sensors, the report said. Most were from the past few years."
The study documented 11 UAP near-misses reported by pilots and a small number of cases in which military aircraft "processed radio frequency energy associated with UAP sightings." Most reports also described objects that interrupted training or other U.S. military exercises, it stated.
Im sure in many cases human make all kinds of errors, when the best and brightest trained airmen, sailor, radar ops, and experts all witness the same thing odds of human error and machinery that somehow defective but fixes itself after the encounter drop astronomically.
In one of Korbells recordings the guys on the USS Princeton described an object moving 62 miles in 2 seconds - if they got it right thats 111600 miles an hour. I think an audible you can hear a guy say 46 or 48K an hour speeds.
Lets play the were a bunch of dopes angle-
Maybe they are all just a bunch of idiots that shouldn't be enlisted in the first place?
Its hilarious to me our military doenst have enough data when they're in charge of entire satellite constellations and all our military assets.
How long have they beeb collecting data?
https://www.reuters.com/business/ae...ufos-leaves-sightings-unexplained-2021-06-25/
"UAP clearly pose a safety of flight issue and may pose a challenge to U.S. national security," the report stated, adding that the phenomena "probably lack a single explanation."
"The task force focused on phenomena witnessed first-hand by military aviators, with 80 reports involving detection by multiple sensors, the report said. Most were from the past few years."
The study documented 11 UAP near-misses reported by pilots and a small number of cases in which military aircraft "processed radio frequency energy associated with UAP sightings." Most reports also described objects that interrupted training or other U.S. military exercises, it stated.
Im sure in many cases human make all kinds of errors, when the best and brightest trained airmen, sailor, radar ops, and experts all witness the same thing odds of human error and machinery that somehow defective but fixes itself after the encounter drop astronomically.
In one of Korbells recordings the guys on the USS Princeton described an object moving 62 miles in 2 seconds - if they got it right thats 111600 miles an hour. I think an audible you can hear a guy say 46 or 48K an hour speeds.
Lets play the were a bunch of dopes angle-
Maybe they are all just a bunch of idiots that shouldn't be enlisted in the first place?
Its hilarious to me our military doenst have enough data when they're in charge of entire satellite constellations and all our military assets.
How long have they beeb collecting data?
Last edited:
- Status
