Originally Posted By: ClarkB
Originally Posted By: nthach
Originally Posted By: ClarkB
Originally Posted By: nthach
...And yes, you have an LX-i, basically the Accord LX with the Prelude B-series motor...
My '89 had the A20A3 engine, I'm sure that most LX-i's had it. I know there was a "B" series engine, but not the same as the more famous B16 and B18, it was a B20 that didn't share much with the smaller displacement B's or the latter B20 in the CRV.
Back on topic, I would recommend regular auto transmission fluid changes. It has a screen, not a filter in the transmission so no need to think about changing that. Mine had 204K miles and the transmission was going south in a hurry. It would slip really bad on the 3-4 shift and it got worse in cold weather. I bought it used with 168K miles and I'm guessing the transmission had little attention before that.
Clark
Clark
I think the A20s are carb'd motors, I was doing a carb R&R on a 87 Prelude DX. Talk about PITA...
The i in LX-i during that era means like BMW and the Euros, injected.
The A20A1 and A20A2 were carbed, the A20A3 and A20A4 were injected, at least according to Wiki.
Again, back to this thread...I would say that in comparing my '89 Accord to my current '99 Civic, the Accord was better built. Everything in it felt sturdy, like it was meant to be there. By comparison certain parts in my Civic feel like they might be held in with one bolt or screw and they decided that was enough.
I wish Honda still made 'em like that '89. All that to say you've got a great car there. If you can keep the road salt off it you should be able to put 200K on it no problem.
Clark
Yeah, I like the way most Japanese car bodies were built in the 1980s.
Every vehicle information plaque looked like a badge of honor back then. Now everything has ordinary labels.
However, I would never want to deal with 1980s CV joints.