The automated widget that recommends a Crown Victoria in every thread has been asleep at the switch a lot lately.Did it really take 57 posts before the obvious got posted?
Man, BITOG is starting to slip, just ain't what it used to be anymore.
The automated widget that recommends a Crown Victoria in every thread has been asleep at the switch a lot lately.Did it really take 57 posts before the obvious got posted?
Man, BITOG is starting to slip, just ain't what it used to be anymore.
Did you mean Mazda3? The 5 is more of a compact minivan. I don’t think anyone would ever consider it very sporty.
Ooohhh…now you’ve made me want one.The 5 is just a 3 with more space inside, which is an important consideration for the OP
The 5 uses the exact same suspension as the 3, so yes, it can definitely be sporty, and it was even available with a manual transmission too.
Powertrain is common Honda. Most other parts are available from GM dealers, or if not, junkyards.What's parts availability like? I'm concerned about that, as the S series I do believe have that issue.
Junkyards? Been a while, but I think around here, cars go in and after 2-3 months, or whatever, off they go to the crusher. I'm not sure, as I haven't been to a junkyard in years.Powertrain is common Honda. Most other parts are available from GM dealers, or if not, junkyards.
What woes? This isn't like Nissan CVTs.How did the Saturn version escape the notorious Honda V6 automatic woes?
Honda make substantial changes/improvements by 2005 with the ATs in their V6 models. Are they flawless ? No, but there's sooooo many of them out there, it can seem like they're bad. Part of that is also because "the internet never forgets" and too many people talk about "I heard..." stories. Local Honda/Acura specialist told me those transmissions are very reliable.Hrm. Honda V6 with an automatic? How did the Saturn version escape the notorious Honda V6 automatic woes?
But Saturn started using V6's in 2003. That might have been a GM V6... but in '04 it switched to Honda. Which is before the 2005 fix. So do the 03-05 models have an automatic transmission problem? or was it a GM automatic transmission? It looks like it could be either Aisin or Honda.Honda make substantial changes/improvements by 2005 with the ATs in their V6 models. Are they flawless ? No, but there's sooooo many of them out there, it can seem like they're bad. Part of that is also because "the internet never forgets" and too many people talk about "I heard..." stories. Local Honda/Acura specialist told me those transmissions are very reliable.
Did it really take 57 posts before the obvious got posted?
Man, BITOG is starting to slip, just ain't what it used to be anymore.
I was an independent insurance adjuster for State Farm. I wanted a break from being a tech. That’s a myth that trucks and SUV’s are safer. body on frame vehicle, driver and passengers absorb the impact. unibody has crunple zones and are designed to cage the driver and passengers leaving them safety. Also, the higher the vehicle, the center of gravity changes causing a rollover. SUV and trucks flip over easy. Heavier is not better, it puts more impact on your body.Based on what? Most studies show the opposite - just google. Modern SUV's / CUV's are much safer overall. They sit higher - putting the occupants further out of reach of larger vehicles. Modern SUV's / CUV's are no longer tippy like those in the past. They are often heavier, although not always. Heavier is better in a crash - absorbs more force with less shock transfered to the occupants. Better site lines may prevent an accident to begin with.
The 5 is just a 3 with more space inside, which is an important consideration for the OP
The 5 uses the exact same suspension as the 3, so yes, it can definitely be sporty, and it was even available with a manual transmission too.
I went and looked at a Mazda5 today while I was out running errands. Neat little car! Like a mini-minivan.The 5 is just a 3 with more space inside, which is an important consideration for the OP
The 5 uses the exact same suspension as the 3, so yes, it can definitely be sporty, and it was even available with a manual transmission too.
It was a black day on the forum when they were discontinued.It’s just that they don’t make them anymore.
I think all the suggested SUV / CUV's listed here are unibody. I am not even sure how many body on frame SUV's exist anymore - 4 runner, Tahoe, wrangler? Most are unibody.I was an independent insurance adjuster for State Farm. I wanted a break from being a tech. That’s a myth that trucks and SUV’s are safer. body on frame vehicle, driver and passengers absorb the impact. unibody has crunple zones and are designed to cage the driver and passengers leaving them safety. Also, the higher the vehicle, the center of gravity changes causing a rollover. SUV and trucks flip over easy. Heavier is not better, it puts more impact on your body.
I think all the suggested SUV / CUV's listed here are unibody. I am not even sure how many body on frame SUV's exist anymore - 4 runner, Tahoe, wrangler? Most are unibody.
Roll overs are an extremely small percentage of accidents. Roll overs are definitely dangerous when they do happen, but modern CUV's are pretty stable, especially with stability control algorithms.
F=MxA. In a collision with another vehicle A is equal. If you have more mass, the force part on your vehicle is less. Algebra.
Every study I have read said all things being equal, higher and heavier cars are safer. I realize if you compare a 1971 F100 with a 2022 Camry there are other factors.
Thanks for making my point for me : "The same statistics found SUVs to be associated with the least amount of deaths."![]()
Are Pickup Trucks Safer Than SUVs?
The safety of a car is a big deal to most buyers. When deciding between a truck and an SUV, it's worth asking which vehicle style is safer.www.motorbiscuit.com