Originally Posted By: cadfaeltex
I remember as I really started to notice cars in the late '70's - early '80's that MB, Volvo, and Saab were cars famous for their reliability. By the end of the decade the Japanese had swooped in and Honda and Toyota seemed to hold that title for about twenty years. As I survey the new car landscape now, there doesn't seem to be any contender for that throne.
Have we seen the end of legendary reliability? Is it just that mechanicals now are enough better that no one marque stands apart?
Or is there a maker today making such cars and I just am ignorant of it?
It's not so much that there is no contender for the throne, but that there are many contenders. Volvo did't slip. Everyone else caught up. Honda isn't what they used to be, but they are still par with all the other leaders.
Today it would be much easier to identify those who haven't figured out how to make a long lasting car. Most anything coming out of a plant owned by FCA would fit in that category.
Volvo and Saab used to toot their own horns about their cars going 300,000 miles or better. That's nothing today. There are plenty of models from Ford, Toyota, GM, Honda, Subaru, Mazda, Nissan, that can make 300k miles. Perhaps even VW, Mercedes, Audi? I don't have enough exposure to European cars to say.
The key is maintenance. Perform all PM work when due. Make repairs when needed.