Hmm... was just saw a tweet saying that the EPA refused to allow Texas to run all of their operational power plants at 100% output during the crisis and that there was 110% of capacity available to meet the demand except for the standing federal limits.
So, first off, consider the source of the information. The Twitter feed you've quoted states "I maintain a news aggregation site called Deplatformed for conservatives who feel censored by the left." You decide if you think that is unbiased information or not.
Then, in that thread, the poster included the actual order from the Department of Energy (note the poster already got it wrong - it was not the EPA who ordered anything here). The order didn't say that Texas could not use the sources of power at rates that exceeded their permits - what it did say is here are the conditions in which you can use that power - Under a Level 2 or 3 event and must be curtailed once the event ends, and there is a cost associated with that power.
The original poster gives you the original clickbait tweet and then issues a correction in the 9th tweet of the thread. Guess which tweet gets shared and which one is ignored...
Use Twitter sources extremely carefully - these are typical tatics. Get everyone riled up over a controversial tweet with a correction buried tweets later that is conveniently ignored.