Same can be said for anecdotes in the vice versa. No matter how hard some want to believe otherwise
. The better mpg from FE oils is negligible. But so too is the wear protection of a higher grade oil when not called for by the manufacturer in your region. Both are true but at negligible levels for the individual owner.
I think I mentioned this before...
A good example of this can be seen when comparing some Volkswagen/Audi approved oils, VW505/502 (Xw-40 with 3.5 hths) to VW508/509 (0W-20 with 2.6 hths) using the Lubrizol Performance Tool. The 508 (0W-20) outperforms the 505 (Xw-40) in various areas and equals it in wear protection. Yes, a 2.6 hths oil equalling a 3.5 hths in wear protection.
I was skeptical too. Skeptical until i saw various UOA showing this LL oil could go the distance (its recommended for 10k miles in turbo GDi applications) with very little wear. But those are just anecdotal so I'll revert back to Lubrizol. And let's not assume that VW508 oils require majority PAO. They do not and most are majority GrpIII with LL (long life) additives.
Now granted, VW504 is currently the king of the crop where VW oils is concerned and wear is measured by the same Lubrizol tool i mentioned. And It has a 3.5 hths requirement.
online.lubrizol.com
I do believe there is a point of diminishing returns with all things being equal (strictly speaking - hths). But the lower grades appear to be getting the lion's share of technical improvements in the area of anti-wear additives. How far this can be taken is a good question.