Originally Posted By: 91344George
I suppose that it is a "crime" now to for whites to desire a homogenous nation? Fancy that.
With you living in California (according to your profile) you ought to know the answer to that is an affirmative.
Here's a fun observational game for you to play.
When you see news stories about a crime being committed, particularly something egregious or violent, pay attention to how race is handled by the media source. If the suspect is white, the news story will make that known right up front either via a direct mention of it within the first 1/4 of the story or by including a picture of the suspect.
If race is conspicuously absent from the news story, particularly if its painfully obvious they have gone out of their way to avoid mentioning race... well you get the idea.
Example:
A few months ago we had a fatal shooting at a gas station in my city. Within a couple of hours the cops had the shooter and one of two accomplices in custody. The next day there was only a mention bare details of the case with no names involved. The following day a more detailed piece was in the paper. Still no mention of race or pictures of the suspects despite the fact that the booking photos were available on the website of the county jail. One of the accomplices was still at large and other than a name, no physical description was given.
Contrast this to a few weeks ago when we had a very well thought out bank robbery involving a stolen getaway vehicle taken the night before the robbery and a bomb threat called into one of the local schools to distract/tie up the cops 30 min before the robbery took place. It took about 2 weeks, but the cops managed to find the suspect and accomplice. The next day the paper read to the effect, "Mike Smith, a 30 year old white male, and Jane Jones, and 28 year old white female have been arrested in connection with the robbery of Acme Savings and Loan," and included the booking photos from the county jail.
