Tesla at 1.2M miles, only took 14 motors & 4 batteries.

Still on my original motor and cvt transmission and tires have almost 100k miles on these 19" Yokohama 96V rated, think people looking at electric cars going forward should be "forewarned" instead. Where does all that waste go? How long do the tires last?

View attachment 245883

View attachment 245884
LOL.. Put that car on the German autobahn over some of those 100k miles and then we'll talk.
 
Still on my original motor and cvt transmission and tires have almost 100k miles on these 19" Yokohama 96V rated, think people looking at electric cars going forward should be "forewarned" instead. Where does all that waste go? How long do the tires last?
I think this one case is an outlier. They must have done lots of fast charging, and discharging, which is not the typical user case. I also wonder if they drove hard and if that was not a factor in short motor life too.

At the moment it seems most EV's are in the performance category, and thus are hard on tires. There are some lesser(?) EV's that are probably easier on tires--and to some large degree, tire wear is due to the user. Accelerate and deaccelerate hard, and corner hard, and it won't matter what vehicle you are driving, tires will wear faster. [Heck I do none of the above, and mine are at 4/32's after 40k--I live in a twisty area apparently. I've had OEM tires on new cars wear out in 30k.]
 
Would be interesting to know how much electricity/cost was involved to reach that point as well, which is something often not mentioned with the EV vs ICE comparison.

Because with the wonky maths some people do, they think the solar electric is free. But I count the installation cost amortised over the warranty period and such and then it's far from free electric.
 
This seems to be an early model so probably free charging for the life of the vehicle. That would have saved a bit of money.

He's on the 4th battery in 1.2 million miles. The actual distances traveled on 2 of the batteries were 670,000 and 505,000 km. Two replacement batteries were rebuilds. The 4th battery is new and was recently installed. The batteries were changed under a lifetime battery warranty. Battery life is actually quite good.

Fourteen motors is beyond terrible. But this is early production and a Model S besides which still have a bad repair record. It was a used customer care vehicle with 30,000 km on the clock when he got it so we don't know if it still had the original factory motor. He talks about getting 780,000 kms on one of the motors which he thinks was new. Which also makes the miles covered by the other motors even worse. Miles on rebuilt motor are less informative. Most of these motors seem to have been "rebuilt by a guy in Croatia". I hope he's getting a volume discount. Fourteen motors is still terrible.
 
Last edited:
Not really sure what to think. Over 100k miles/yr in a passenger car in Germany. That's an insane when you realize that it's not uncommon for an ICE to require an overhaul at 100k-150k miles because of the speeds allowed on the autobahn. We're also talking incredibly high discharge rates on the battery and we don't know how often he was using fast charging, but my guess is a lot.

This is impressive.
I'd love to read @Trav take on that. He lived in Germany for quite a while.
 
The guy replaced 14 motors and 4 batteries. I don’t see anything special at all.

It’s not many Americans that will bother when they can buy a new Tesla. In this case he could have bought a few new Teslas instead of paying repair costs. Which for some reason I don’t see published. I’m sure he kept records. Easily over $100,000 to $150,000 in repairs I would guess, maybe more, why no records?

I don’t know why the ICE reference, just like EVs most don’t bother.
With model S batteries in the $25-$35k price per battery pack that's 100-140k. Plus whatever a motor costs times 14. That easily exceeded the price of a new one.
 
It's an early car that was before they fixed the motor issues. Basic math shows the battery hits its metrics. Even then, show me the amount of ICE cars on the road with 300k miles. It's not many.
I think it's way more than you assume, especially if you exclude rust belt cars from the equation. The average age of a car in the United States is 12.5 year old and the average driver drives 14.5k miles per year. That's going to put the average number of miles on a vehicle in the USA well over 150k. These numbers are skewed downward by the rust belt, BTW, so average ages are even higher in the South and Western states.

Most cars are not scrapped due to engine failure and a huge number of old cars are never scrapped at all (at least here). The USA exports about a million used cars a year (not including the stolen car export market).
 
With model S batteries in the $25-$35k price per battery pack that's 100-140k. Plus whatever a motor costs times 14. That easily exceeded the price of a new one.
The owner says two of the batteries were replaced under warranty. The one he just installed is a new one though and it's not clear whether it was done under warranty and if not, why not. The car is supposed to have a lifetime battery warranty. Maybe Tesla said a million miles is far enough.

What do you suppose "that guy in Croatia" charges to rebuild a motor? Probably not a lot. Some of the replacements could have been done under the Tesla warranty and some under sort of warranty from "that guy in Croatia." Or maybe the Tesla owner just needs a reason to go to Croatia - again. He seems awfully sanguine about replacing all those motors.

I think he would have been better off buying new motors (there is probably 1 in the front and 1 in the back) rather than a series of refurbished ones, but that's just me.
 
The Autobahn is not really as big an engine killer as what many people would think, the oils used are made for that sort of use and the cars are geared for higher speeds. The oil and coolant temps remain stable as do the other fluids. I worked on many high mile engines, some with 400-500K on them, my wifes Toyota 1.6 GTI had over 300K on it and saw lots of high speed use, the engine was perfect.
The difference in RPM between a German spec Audi 80 and a US spec Audi 4000 back in the day at 150kmh was huge, the US model was quicker 0-100kmh.
 
The Autobahn is not really as big an engine killer as what many people would think, the oils used are made for that sort of use and the cars are geared for higher speeds. The oil and coolant temps remain stable as do the other fluids. I worked on many high mile engines, some with 400-500K on them, my wifes Toyota 1.6 GTI had over 300K on it and saw lots of high speed use, the engine was perfect.
The difference in RPM between a German spec Audi 80 and a US spec Audi 4000 back in the day at 150kmh was huge, the US model was quicker 0-100kmh.
The owner of the Model S says he doesn't drive very fast. As I recall he mentions 100 km/h (62 MPH) as his typical speed.
 
Title speaks for itself. Impressive, yet not impressive at the same time. One would think that the motor issue would be fixed by 3rd, 4th, or 5th replacement max... I still strongly agree with Toyota that Hybrids are the ultimate answer.

View attachment 245871
https://www.vehiclesuggest.com/tesl...bJ4bIX7PjsHkcynxJA_aem_rhZ3BzC3cOdN3W06-kC6sA


Hybrids also have ev motors that can break. The issue is Teslas quality. Not the fact that it has an electric motor(s).
 
Back
Top Bottom