Aren’t the foaming requirements per ASTM D6082 nearly identical between gasoline and diesel oils with an API license? In fact isn’t the diesel one is a bit more stringent?
I'm still wondering why some refuse to use the correct oil for their application. For example, @edyvw recommended MB 229.5 approved motor oil. Most, but not all MB 229.5 motor oils also carry a Porsche A40 approval which doesn't allow for any foaming of the motor oil. It's just easier and safer to use what works best for an engine and allows the owner to get the most useful life out of it versus what's perceived to work best.Aren’t the foaming requirements per ASTM D6082 nearly identical between gasoline and diesel oils with an API license? In fact isn’t the diesel one is a bit more stringent?
How many miles has Rotella served semi drivers over the years? Millions????
I have been a Rotella fan forever... but recently, when you compare prices with a jug that has 4 quarts vs a jug that has 5 quarts, it causes you to ..... shop.
Just a trip into wally world and compare Rotella 4 qt to all the other 5qt is an eye opener. I am finding myself going to the 5qts......
.....
Let me tell you something. I have been using these Rotella products on my and friends vehicles for multiple years and multiple thousands of miles. In the appropriate application --- very hard to beat. Will continue to use Rotella moving forward.I don't get your point. An oil formulated for a big diesel with a massive sump that spends 90% of its life cruising at 1500-2000 rpm is not going to be good for a gas engine turning 3x the rpm with 1/5th the sump capacity. That's not even touching the differences in detergent chemistry against gas/ethanol dilution vs diesel dilution or dispersant chemistry catered to the dirtier sooty environment of a diesel engine's crankcase.
Here's a metaphor. Orange oil makes a good degreaser that'll remove caked on dirt and other crud from wood surfaces without damaging the finish. So you think, if it performed so well on that wood table, it'll work good at removing the oil stains on my concrete driveway. So you pour it on and freak out after it starts eating the concrete. You're using a product outside the scope of its chemistry which almost never ends well.
Let me tell you something. I have been using these Rotella products on my and friends vehicles for multiple years and multiple thousands of miles. In the appropriate application --- very hard to beat. Will continue to use Rotella moving forward.View attachment 219213
Astro, you know I love ya - but these folks just bicker to bicker.... you'd have to lock every post in this section to stop the one-upmanship since everyone is so much smarter than the other puny mortals (who are also immortal and genuisses's) they bicker with.Bickering posts have been deleted. Let’s stay on topic, please.
This guy probably uses goose fat in his fighter jet engine......My daddy can beat up your daddy
I see all your vehicles are 700hp plus, spinning some 7-8000rpm.Let me tell you something. I have been using these Rotella products on my and friends vehicles for multiple years and multiple thousands of miles. In the appropriate application --- very hard to beat. Will continue to use Rotella moving forward.View attachment 219213
I’d assume the JASO MA/MA2 has a decent foaming requirement too.Aren’t the foaming requirements per ASTM D6082 nearly identical between gasoline and diesel oils with an API license? In fact isn’t the diesel one is a bit more stringent?
I’d assume the JASO MA/MA2 has a decent foaming requirement too.
ASTM D892:Aren’t the foaming requirements per ASTM D6082 nearly identical between gasoline and diesel oils with an API license? In fact isn’t the diesel one is a bit more stringent?
Do you happen to know what the Porsche A40 foaming requirements are?ASTM D892:
Sequence I: 24C
Sequence II: 94C
Sequence III: 24C
ASTM D6082:
Sequence IV: 150C
CJ-4:
ASTM D892 tendency/stability ml
Sequence I: 10/0 max
Sequence II: 20/0 max
Sequence III: 10/0 max
API SP:
ASTM D892 tendency/stability ml
Sequence I: 10/0 max
Sequence II: 50/0 max
Sequence III: 10/0 max
ASTM D6082 tendency/stability ml
Sequence IV: 100/0 max
ACEA 2016:
ASTM D892 tendency/stability ml
Sequence I: 10/0 max
Sequence II: 50/0 max
Sequence III: 10/0 max
ASTM D6082 tendency/stability ml
Sequence IV: 100/0 max
Mercedes 229.3/229.31/229.5/229.51/229.52/229.6/229.61/229.71:
ASTM D892 tendency/stability ml
Sequence I: 10/0 max
Sequence II: 20/0 max
Sequence III: 10/0 max
ASTM D6082 tendency/stability ml
Sequence IV: 100/0 max
So, it looks like D892, CJ-4 is more stringent, but CJ-4 doesn't test D6082 at 150C. Most of the MB certs push the same D892 limits but include the D6082 150C test.
I absolutely agree with this. That is why when I hear the "the same oil that NASCAR race cars use" falls on deaf ears with me too.I don't get your point. An oil formulated for a big diesel with a massive sump that spends 90% of its life cruising at 1500-2000 rpm is not going to be good for a gas engine turning 3x the rpm with 1/5th the sump capacity. That's not even touching the differences in detergent chemistry against gas/ethanol dilution vs diesel dilution or dispersant chemistry catered to the dirtier sooty environment of a diesel engine's crankcase.
Here's a metaphor. Orange oil makes a good degreaser that'll remove caked on dirt and other crud from wood surfaces without damaging the finish. So you think, if it performed so well on that wood table, it'll work good at removing the oil stains on my concrete driveway. So you pour it on and freak out after it starts eating the concrete. You're using a product outside the scope of its chemistry which almost never ends well.
I do not unfortunately.Do you happen to know what the Porsche A40 foaming requirements are?