Super tech filters

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted by bchannell
I mean this totally respectfully,
That is patently NOT TRUE. The Magnuson-Moss expressly forbids this type of situation UNLESS, the manufacturer provides, {in this case}, the filter for FREE. As long as the aftermarket filter is appropriate for the application, and it was not defective in some way, no problem. If that were true, aftermarket filters would not sell well at all, nor would air filters, oil, ATF, yatta, yatta, yatta. Now, obviously, if the aftermarket filter was somehow defective, then sure, the manufacturer would have no liability.
This is why we have certifications, .. manufacturers provide specific "specifications" that oil, filters, ATF etc must meet to be acceptable for use.


As MH pointed out above (and the linked FAQ Bulletin issued by the FTC he posted describes), I'm talking about a defective aftermarket filter causing engine damage, and the car manufacturer proved it was the aftermarket filter's fault. I highly doubt a car manufacturer is going to replace an engine under warranty if an aftermarket filter failed and caused the damage. The car manufacturer would propably make you go after the filter maker, and most brand name filter makers have warranty statements for such situations. Might need to read the fine print of the car manufacturer's warranty statement to see if they talk about use of "OEM Approved" aftermarket parts with respect to warranty coverage.

If the filter was an OEM part and failed causing engine damage, then of course the car manufacturer is going to cover it all, should be no questions in that situation.
 
Originally Posted by WellOiled
Now, having said this, I will probably be stoned by the WIX/NAPA Gold fans.
27.gif



That's called living on the edge ...‚ðŸ‘
 
Originally Posted by Triple_Se7en
WellOiled
The WIX/NAPA Gold fans don't stone anymore. The Board Of Wix Oil Slappies Anonymous changed Amendment Six to nearest tree hanging.

That's good to know!
wink.gif
 
He specifically included a reference to a situation where if the filter clearly failed, yes, the automaker has every right to dispute or deny a claim.

And regarding an auto maker approved filter or other part, when does that ever happen? I mean, for instance, Ford having a list of"approved" oil filters, alternators, brake pads, etc that aren't labeled as Motorcraft.
 
Originally Posted by hallstevenson
He specifically included a reference to a situation where if the filter clearly failed, yes, the automaker has every right to dispute or deny a claim.


That's pretty much what I said. Highly likely that no car manufacturer is going to cover damage under warranty that was caused by another company's defective part/product.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom