Shooting on the street

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: OVERK1LL

:facepalm:

He's not saying that the fact that they are black is the reason they brought the "ghetto" to his street. He's stating that they brought the ghetto to his street and that they are black. It's a description, not a label.


Thank you. Not that terribly difficult a concept, especially if you have a bit of reading comprehension and arent outlright trying to start a fight on something that need not be one.
 
Just to add a little levity to your situation (since you need it), here's my own neighborhood experience, which is pretty much the inverse of yours.

We bought our house about 15 years ago, in Seattle's only predominantly black neighborhood. It's walking distance to downtown, it was affordable at the time, and there was a lot of unique, old architecture in the area--much of it unspoiled. The neighborhood was really a mixed bag, but generally seemed "safe enough" if you didn't owe anyone any money. It was also affordable, in a city that generally isn't--which was the biggest factor in us buying here.

Along the way, I learned a new word: "whiterification", my neighbor's take on gentrification... When my wife and I were standing outside our newly-purchased house, he came up to us and said "there goes the neighborhood!". Some of the other neighbors were a little less humorous about our presence though. It took one guy about 7 years to actually say "hello" to me. I didn't really take it personally, though. They could see their way of life changing, and pretty drastically.

Fast forward 15 years and the neighborhood really looks nothing like it did. Most of the families that lived here have moved. Some cashed out, some had their place foreclosed on after they leveraged it to the hilt, others simply died and the kids wanted no part of the 'hood. A couple families have stayed, saying "whitey's not gonna run them outta town". Everyone gets on well, most of the houses have been restored and typically most people on the block don't even lock their doors. Even in this market, the neighborhood really isn't affordable any longer.

I grew up in a neighborhood that defined "white flight", so I got to see first-hand how fear and poverty ruin a neighborhood. It sounds like your nuisance house is an isolated incident and is being sorted out, so I doubt you have any real worries. But if you decided to leave, you can always look for a neighborhood like mine!
 
"Im free and absolutely correct to say that if a poor person is dealing drugs, in gangs, moving different people in and out of section 8 housing, etc that they are criminals, because that is the situation at the end of my street."
JHZR2- I feel for you. I hope you and your neighbors are successful in eliminating these low-lifes from your neighborhood. But are the offenders really "poor" ? If they are gang-connected and dealing drugs they are probably more affluent than anyone knows..but they are still lowlifes ! Good luck to you.
 
Originally Posted By: refaller
Did someone just hear the word "apologist"? Seems a little misunderstood here, allow me to defend the word. Being an apologist is someone who offers a defense with a systematic use of reason. It should be a compliment.

ref


It is understood perfectly in the context of this thread.
lol.gif
 
It could be worse. I remember an Army Ranger I had the privilege of working with tell me about an NCO in his command who bought and fixed up houses in bad neighborhoods. Google Tacoma drug dealers rangers and read about how a squad of Rangers took back a neighborhood from the drug dealers, or just check the link for one mostly correct account: http://www.thenewstribune.com/2009/09/27/895048/ash-street-shootout-the-night.html

In the account I heard, the police were quite a bit less supportive than the available newspaper accounts indicate. The Rangers weren't Vigilantes , but were just protecting their lives and property.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top