OK, for those who are new to CATERHAM's style of "discussion", here is where he is misrepresenting my statements and positions.
I have tried to correct this many, many times, but he continues to bring out the same statements that he attributes to me and my processes.
I correct him, he wheels them out over and over.
Originally Posted By: CATERHAM
And who are you?
Oh right, you're that guy who actually believes oil flow doesn't matter!
My statement is that oil galleries are full of oil.
Bearings, as they operate draw oil out of galleries to make up for side leakage. When they don't NEED the volume of oil, the artifact is backpressure, which is oil pressure.
I have demonstrated through basic design theory and charts, SAE papers, other industry work, and worked examples of my own that prove this, but they are dismissed as "technical obfuscation"...by an individual who wants to replace actual proven science with his own reality.
There is no rational reason to lower viscosity to the closure of the oil pump relief and ensure that all of the oil goes through the bearings...the manufacturer's minimum oil pressure is a diagnostic tool for a worn engine on their specified oils...CATERHAM has misrepresented their intent with his theories.
As an aise, if your engine has piston cooling squirters, you will REDUCE the piston cooling flow when you reduce oil pressure.
Originally Posted By: CATERHAM
But that shouldn't come as a total surprise from someone who used to run a 15W-50 in a late model GM V6
This one he wheels out regularly is a LIE.
I posted a UOA from a friend on another forum in which he ran 15W50 in a 3.8 V-6 (Holden's recomnedations 20W50)....
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2446765
I have explained that it's not my car, I have NEVER run a 50 in my L67...but CATERHAM, despite being corrected multiple times, wheels it out as a fact again and again...not to address any of my arguments, but as a feeble method to discredit.
I have asked him to show me what damage this oil caused, but there are always crickets chirping at that point.
Originally Posted By: CATERHAM
who thinks a mono grade (99 VI) dino oil is best for track use and running
Case in question was a Honda(?) racing a beater oval track endurance series, who had an acknowledged oil consumption problem.
My recommendation was that to finish first, you first have to finish, so the first order of business was minimising oil consumption at operating temperature, not minimising friction during warm-up.
I still stand by that recommendation for THAT car, in THAT application.
Originally Posted By: CATERHAM
a 20 grade oil even when specified will shorten engine life
No, OEMS are moving to their thinner grades, IN THEIR OWN WORDS, for fuel economy and carbon emmissions, while still offering to provide "acceptable" durability.
My statement is that even IF they are sacrificing some small amount of engine life on a car that will be sold, wrecked, and never see out the life of the engine, it's a fair trade.
Originally Posted By: CATERHAM
just to mention few of your motor oil beliefs.
Like NOACK has some importance, and was intended for emissions systems protection ?
Like you don't NEED 0W at 100F.
Like it's "warmup wear", not "startup wear", with the wear taking place in the period while the engine is warming, a fraction of it being in the seconds beforeoil pressure is established (see Sequence IV...the manufacturers seem to put some credence in THAT warmup wear test.
Like at temperatures around freezing, a 0W won't fill the galleries any quicker than a 5W or 10W.
Originally Posted By: CATERHAM
So yes you are indeed one of the BITOG go to guys if you want a totally antedeluvian viewpoint on motor oil.
And the icing is always his pompous parting shots.
So back to the OP, don't take his scaremongering a fact, it's opinion, and it's overblown for dramatic effect and fear.
Check out the (not my) Holden UOA I linked, and see how badly the 15W50 perfromed...I'm running 5W40 in mine, and have the next 3-4 oil changes in the shed, 5W30 and 10W30 A3/B4, two grades lower than the OEM manual for my vehicle, and 1 lower than the cold weather recommendation of 15W40).