2001 BMW 325i 5MT Sport Euro Spec/Delivery... 191,767 miles and still on original clutch and flywheel. It's my daily.
My fully built and custom SC'd 328Ci 6MT (the car has fewer stock parts than aftermarket parts at this point I'd wager), which sees almost exactly 1/3rd of its miles at the track (HPDE/open/competition) has done over 40k (13k being on track) with the same Ultra-Light dual-mass clutch/flywheel kit (21.3lb total, for the two combined) with a redline @ 8000rpm, 16.5psi+ boost from a Lysholm blower with the motor built to almost 11:1 CR, putting down 442rwhp/408rwtq on 93 pump (peak power at redline, 95 percent of peak torque from 1500-7200rpm)... Zero issues.
I have not had one single problem with a manual transmission in all of the BMW's I've owned, nor Porsche (911 GT3 RS).
The only reason why the 911 Turbo w AT is faster from a dig than the MT is due to the ability to force the car into boost at launch by simultaneously revving (loading) the motor while standing on the brakes. It is not because of the AT being a better technology.
My fully built and custom SC'd 328Ci 6MT (the car has fewer stock parts than aftermarket parts at this point I'd wager), which sees almost exactly 1/3rd of its miles at the track (HPDE/open/competition) has done over 40k (13k being on track) with the same Ultra-Light dual-mass clutch/flywheel kit (21.3lb total, for the two combined) with a redline @ 8000rpm, 16.5psi+ boost from a Lysholm blower with the motor built to almost 11:1 CR, putting down 442rwhp/408rwtq on 93 pump (peak power at redline, 95 percent of peak torque from 1500-7200rpm)... Zero issues.
I have not had one single problem with a manual transmission in all of the BMW's I've owned, nor Porsche (911 GT3 RS).
The only reason why the 911 Turbo w AT is faster from a dig than the MT is due to the ability to force the car into boost at launch by simultaneously revving (loading) the motor while standing on the brakes. It is not because of the AT being a better technology.