SAE vs Metric

The rachets for my metric sockets sets are in inches: 3/8 and 1/2. Why is that?
Same reason spark plug threads are metric even going back almost 100 years and the socket size in in SAE. The model T was 1/2" pipe threads.
The first commercially viable plugs and O2 sensors were from Bosch so being European they used metric, the first ratchets were developed in the USA in inch so to keep things compatible between manufacturers these standards were kept.
 
The rachets for my metric sockets sets are in inches: 3/8 and 1/2. Why is that?
USA ratchet makers were the most plentiful in olden days? Although they also fully understood metric. Ratchets are from 1/4 to 1 inch in 5 common sizes. The world gets used to it.
 
NLZ is the brand name of NL&Z Import Company in Australia, and the description at https://www.nlzimport.com.au/products/mcw-7_c?_pos=4&_psq=Multi-Fit&_ss=e&_v=1.0 shows the same images you included.

Lowes retailed a line called Multi-Fit at one time per https://www.amazon.com/Kobalt-14-Piece-Direct-Ratchet-0607975/dp/B00QDBD38G that was made in China.

Jonnesway is an established tool manufacturer in Taiwan https://www.jonnesway.com/en_US/company/ and sells on the web at https://www.jonneswaytools.store/products - a wider selection of wrenches and socket sets are sold https://www.ebay.com/str/atptoolsparts

Multi-Fit tools are also called Super Tech, and are sometimes listed as Metric so you have to rely on the part number prefix to be sure: Sockets S68, Wrenches W84, Ratcheting Wrenches W86.

The Metrinch sockets and wrenches that hrv mentioned were US-made way back when but are now made by Cendai Taiwan which boldly promotes the patent by Surelabs USA on its packaging which has long since expired (https://patents.google.com/patent/US4100824A was filed in 1976).

The Metrinch patent reads like a variation/extension of SnapOn's 1965 patent for flank drive, and the Multi-Fit looks like a one step further.
 
The rachets for my metric sockets sets are in inches: 3/8 and 1/2. Why is that?

Because WW2 was an apocalyptic event destroying civilized worlds infrastructure. Really the only two places that could make enough stuff to use and export were USSR and USA.
So you bought your tools from the only place that wasnt bombed into dirt which was that weird Yankee dude who dropped 2 canned sunshine's across the sea. Is having a 1/2 attachment weird? Yes but at least he made you some metric sockets while you were busy digging out from the rubble.
 
I have some inch sockets that they stamped the metric equivalent on them. A number of them can be used on metric, like 3/4” is very close to 19 mm. I still find inch easier to guess at and be right.
Take a caliper and measure 16 vs.5/8,or 19 vs 3/4,you might be surprised how close they are.I'm in the rust belt,I use what fits the best,not concerned with the marking on the tool
 
Gerald Ford,back in the day,could of got U,S.A on the same page as the rest of the world.Many cars had both Metric and SAE on the same cars.That was a real PIA.
 
Honestly I think the reason no one's bothered to do anything metric about plugs is because 9/16" is basically 14mm, 5/8" is 16mm and 13/16" is 21mm

Quite often you'll even see plug hex specs listed as both, say, 5/8" and 16mm.
Which is hilarious because the threading is often metric, often 14mm. My Dad had a 1940 Ford flathead that had metric threads tapped for the plugs! That car was so old, it predated the use of Phillips head screws.

I use a 5/16" on 8mm headed fasteners all the time, it fits tighter/ better. Toolmakers and fastener guys deliberately leave a lot of slop in the sizing, too much IMO.
 
Which is hilarious because the threading is often metric, often 14mm. My Dad had a 1940 Ford flathead that had metric threads tapped for the plugs! That car was so old, it predated the use of Phillips head screws.

I use a 5/16" on 8mm headed fasteners all the time, it fits tighter/ better. Toolmakers and fastener guys deliberately leave a lot of slop in the sizing, too much IMO.
I think your 5/16" experience is just the nature of the manufacturer of your sockets and/or fasteners. Even if both your sockets are the same brand one could have been made on a Friday and one on a Tuesday.

The difference between the two is technically 2.5 thou. Figure the average sheet of paper is 3 thou (you can actually touch off on the side of a square work piece by loosely holding a scrap of paper; when the end mill pulls the paper from your fingers figure you're ~.004" away and set your DRO accordingly) and I have difficulty believing socket or wrench manufacturers are running different tooling for .3125 vs .315"

I strongly suspect all 8mm and 5/16" sockets are the same and just get stamped differently, esp considering all sockets are oversized anyway....who cares if it's 12 thou or 14 thou oversize?

Measuring two Craftsman sockets here in front of me in 3/8" drive, both measure .321" across the flats
 
I use standard in conversation.

I think the starter bolts, bellhousing bolts and likely the engine stand bolts are SAE on a GM 6.2L Diesel.
Yeah, I am not sure. The starter bolts were 14mm, and the front bolt for the support braket were 12 I Think. Alternator was 15. Weird. Of course, they are all close in the `14\15mm\9/16 world, I generally pick which ever fits tighter.

I am going to change the fuel pump tommorrow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: D60
I use standard in conversation.

I think the starter bolts, bellhousing bolts and likely the engine stand bolts are SAE on a GM 6.2L Diesel.
well, the pump bolts were 7/16
the pump cover bolts were 10mm
another randon braket was 10mm
alternator 15mm
harmonic balancer 15/16


guess i am just screwed
 
Those are easily convertible to 11mm & 24mm.

On most 80's & 90's GM vehicles....You might need 3/8", 1/2", 9/16" & 11/16" for certain engine/transmission related repairs.

14mm is a little to tight on 9/16" headed fasteners in my opinion, 13mm is to loose on 1/2", & no replacement for a 3/8"
 
Those are easily convertible to 11mm & 24mm.

On most 80's & 90's GM vehicles....You might need 3/8", 1/2", 9/16" & 11/16" for certain engine/transmission related repairs.

14mm is a little to tight on 9/16" headed fasteners in my opinion, 13mm is to loose on 1/2", & no replacement for a 3/8"
I am with you.

I generally go with the best fit. I probably dont have near the same selection of tools as you, but I like a tight fit, and 6 point better, so I go by what fits better for the application.
 
I have a Metrinch tool set that I got in the 80s and still use today...It works on both....
I have a Metrinch set that I bought in the 90's that I use all of the time. It's my most used socket set because of the ability to work on both SAE and Metric. I actually used it today at the salvage yard. I also have the 76 piece set that I bought years ago as a back up.
 
I have a Metrinch set that I bought in the 90's that I use all of the time. It's my most used socket set because of the ability to work on both SAE and Metric. I actually used it today at the salvage yard. I also have the 76 piece set that I bought years ago as a back up.
What is special about these minus the ability to be used on both? Are they good for rusted fasteners? I first heard about them ~10 years ago from a junkyard employee who swore by them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hrv
Back
Top Bottom