Here I sit, broken hearted
Motorbike sump is fully sharted
Motorbike sump is fully sharted
I would have, if I could have found it on a shelf locally. I found the T5 10w30 for a great price and ran that though. Didn't notice any difference in the fat pig klr. The manual says you can run a 30 but most klr riders stick with a 40. I drained it and refilled with 5w40 T6. Once my T6 supply runs dry I'm going to change over to 0w40 m1 as I use that in all my other engines.Just curious, has anyone has tried the T6 10w30 in their bike yet?
I wanted to make a comment about the JASO logo after reading though this older thread. Many oils that are listed in the filed list of JASO motorcycle oils (link in post 7), do not use the JASO logo on the oil bottle, nor even use the "oil code" number on the bottle. They just say it meets JASO specs.Well you pay your money and you get the ability to use the official logo on the product, so that is a license to me. Nevertheless, Rotella doesn't use the proper JASO logo so you have that. "Recommended for" is about as good as it gets.
Which is very weird to me. But then some blenders have what I call reverse obfuscation and this is likely another example of that.I wanted to make a comment about the JASO logo after reading though this older thread. Many oils that are listed in the filed list of JASO motorcycle oils (link in post 7), do not use the JASO logo on the oil bottle, nor even use the "oil code" number on the bottle. They just say it meets JASO specs.
Example is Castrol Power 1 4T, 10W-40, which I have 3 bottle of and just looked at the bottle and took the photo below, and there is no JASO logo or oil code number shown on the bottle. It just says: "Exceeds industry specifications: API SL and JASO MA-2 standards." So referring to the JASO file list of oil is really the only sure way to know if the oil test data has ever been sent to JASO for registration. Lack of a JASO logo on the bottle doesn't mean much.
It's line 113 in the July 1, 2024 list of JASO oils.
View attachment 228865
View attachment 228864
Apparently it's not a requirement, but a choice to use the JASO logo on the bottle if the oil is registered with JASO. I think the JASO documentation makes it sound like it's an option for the oil maker/seller.Which is very weird to me. But then some blenders have what I call reverse obfuscation and this is likely another example of that.
Yes, you are correct. Then again, I just don’t see why blenders and manufacturers don’t make it clear when they have something that is of value.Apparently it's not a requirement, but a choice to use the JASO logo on the bottle if the oil is registered with JASO. I think the JASO documentation makes it sound like it's an option for the oil maker.
Agree ... strange they don't use the JASO logo if the oil is on the list. I've noticed that oil that's sold through dealerships, like Yamalube and Kawasaki brand oils, do use the JASO logo.Yes, you are correct. Then again, I just don’t see why blenders and manufacturers don’t make it clear when they have something that is of value.
JASO MA is a Japanese standard.Agree ... strange they don't use the JASO logo if the oil is on the list. I've noticed that oil that's sold through dealerships, like Yamalube and Kawasaki brand oils, do use the JASO logo.
View attachment 228871
View attachment 228872
I highly doubt those motorcycle brand oils are made by "Japanese oil companies". Think it has more to do with the oil being sold through the motorcycle dealerships, with the bike brand on the oil bottles. Honda and Suzuki oils most likely have the JASO logo on the bottles too. Not sure about non-Japanese motorcycle brands, maybe they use the JASO logo also if they are on the JASO registration list.JASO MA is a Japanese standard.
All of the oils you posted with the JASO logo are marketed by Japanese companies.
It's not clear to me that large non-Japanese oil companies see the same value in the JASO standards that the Japanese companies do.
For dedicated motorcycle specific oils, the odds of them sporting a JASO MA label are much higher than a diesel oil that also is frequently used for motorcycles.
Just to be clear, I didn't say Japanese oil companies. I said marketed by Japanese companies. Which would include oil sold through Japanese motorcycle dealerships.I highly doubt those motorcycle brand oils are made by "Japanese oil companies". Think it has more to do with the oil being sold through the motorcycle dealerships. Honda and Suzuki oils most likely have the JASO logo on the bottles too. Not sure about non-Japanese motorcycle brands, maybe they use the JASO logo also if they are on the JASO registration list.
I'd venture to bet that every big name motorcycle maker will spec a JASO rated oil for the wet clutch use. It won't always be MA2. My Yamaha XSR900 specs just MA, and it does have a catalytic converter and an O2 sensor. Typically MA2 will be speced for bikes with a catalytic converter, but not always it seems.JASO MA2 seems universally accepted by the motorcycle folks, whether they are Japanese or not.
Yeah, only Shell could answer why they do what they do. If they ever do answer your questions please let us know.I was just trying to conjecture a reason behind Rotella's inconsistent labelling with regards to JASO standards.
I think your suggestion about emailing Shell is on the money. I haven't had very good luck receiving a reply from Shell in the past.
If they didn't make such a good product, I would have given up on them years ago!
Honda and Suzuki oils most likely have the JASO logo on the bottles too.
Understanding synthetics means more refining to remove less desirable
elements from crude until what’s left is mostly higher-performing
molecular structures. Waxy stuff had to go because it made oil congeal
at winter temperatures. Aromatics had to go because they lost
viscosity too rapidly when hot. Unsaturates had to go because they
were vulnerable to heat-driven gumming and sludging. And so on.
Synthetics were invented to give owners advantages conventional oils could not...
technically speaking they will meet and exceed your mileage expectations...
Manufacture synthetic goals...
Higher viscosity index
Better viscosity stability at varied temperatures
Better chemical and shear stability
Consistent fluidity
Better lubricity at low temperatures
Faster lubrication at start-up in low temperatures
Resistance to oxidation (thickening), thermal breakdown, and oil sludge problem
Excellent protection at high temperatures
Engine cleanliness
Outstanding protection against harmful deposits
Cleaner running engines
Lower oil evaporation
More engine power
Lower maintenance cost
![]()
![]()
Or maybe it means that power has an uphill battle.Color me stupid but it looks like the mineral oil is showing a much better power increase. Double check that before submitting to Popular Mechanics for "cut and paste" litany of the month.