Originally Posted By: rrounds
Originally Posted By: Chris142
Originally Posted By: EdwardC
Nope.
Right or wrong, I've subscribed to the school of thought that the air filter should be disturbed as little as possible to avoid letting dirt into the intake. I also let the air filter run much longer than the prescribed interval, assuming it filters better as it gets plugged up.
this. I put restriction gauges on my cars and only open them up as needed.
+2 Use a restriction gauge and KNOW when to change the air filter, I get 90k miles on my S2000 air filter.
Don't ever blow compressed air on a air filter, all you will do is allow more dirt into yuor engine.
http://www.widman.biz/English/Analysis/Cleaning.html
http://www.widman.biz/English/Analysis/High_pressure.html
ROD
OK, some bad oil analysis results,
claimed to be due to air filter cleaning (I assume with compressed air)
This is an interpretation of the results and, while it seems reasonable, doesn't seem to have been definitively proved.
It also seems to assume that filter-cleaning is inherently wrong. In other words, it makes no distinction between cleaning them "well" and cleaning them "badly".
These may be cases where dirt has been blown into the engine or the filter has been damaged. The consequences of this are likely to be worse in South America (or here in Southern Taiwan) than in, say, the UK.
http://www.airfilterblaster.com/
Pneumatic back-flushing gadget
This is aimed at construction/farming/mining plant which of course will clog filters a lot quicker/more expensively than most private cars.
The testing they detail isn't very scientific, pretty close to anecdotal evidence in fact, though that doesn't mean its wrong.
In particular, "damage" is operationally defined as "light doesn't shine through it". That'd be a good way of spotting actual holes, but I might want tighter criteria before I risked my shiny new bulldozer on it.