Which is exactly in line with what the analysis company says, that there is no statisticaly valid UOA difference between any appropriately rated oil. It also supports the notion that a UOA is not an appropriate tool to determine wear.Got lots of good stuff in it, but doesn’t seem much different than most other UOAs as far as wear goes.
I don't think redline is worth the pricey premium they charge.Got lots of good stuff in it, but doesn’t seem much different than most other UOAs as far as wear goes.
TBN is 3.5 so?High TAN, passed TBN. Cut to 5k. This is basically track oil.
Universal average is 18I wonder what the high iron?
When TAN and TBN equalizes it is not good. When TAN pass TBN it is bad. Redline is not ordinary oil. It is designed as performance oil. That mean shorter OCI’s bcs. higher oxidation. I would use it on track at any point, but not longer than 3-5k.TBN is 3.5 so?
Which begs the question why would Blackstone tell him to increase his mileage instead of decrease it?When TAN and TBN equalizes it is not good. When TAN pass TBN it is bad. Redline is not ordinary oil. It is designed as performance oil. That mean shorter OCI’s bcs. higher oxidation. I would use it on track at any point, but not longer than 3-5k.
Blackstone ALWAYS say: go further.Which begs the question why would Blackstone tell him to increase his mileage instead of decrease it?
I think boron? Could be wrong.What do oils with either zero or little moly use as anti wear now? Titanium (like Castrol) or something else?
Or more precisely, your engine is running as expected.Kind of puts 99% of all the UOA posted on this site into perspective.