I don't disagree. Which is why post #5, which echos the consensus on the street because of some silly TSB that blamed 15w-40, doesn't capture the multiple issues going on in the 2019+ valvetrain failures.
We know that contact stresses between a roller lifter and a cam are, all other things equal, higher than those between a flat tappet and a cam. It's as simple as round to round contact vs round to flat, and the changing contact angle as the roller enters/exits a lobe.
Roller followers have line contact on the cam. You have no hydrodynamic wedge between roller and cam because by design the roller and cam have no real oil wedge. The wedge, if it existed, would prevent the roller from actually rolling and you'd have roller skidding. Which leads to rapid component failure. Roller fail for similar reasons as needle bearings-- too much stress concentrated on too little area.
A sliding tappet doesn't really "slide" as many people think of it because the "flat" part isn't flat (it's radiused on a large radius) and it spins across the cam surface, crab walking like you might do with a 55gal drum to get it across your shop floor without having to life it or slide it.