I see that a pure 1 is semi synthetic and so is the mobil1. Other than flow and someone says one or the other filters better--------------What does the extra 5 bucks buy me with the mobil1 filter. Been using pure1 with no probs forever. Why would I change. And I don't think the Mobil1 has that much filter capacity diff. Just wondering what you guys thought. I will change if it is the best.
Pure 1 and a mobil1 whats different
- Thread starter coolman
- Start date
- Status
It says Mobil 1 on the side, so it must be better, right?
IMO, Mobil 1 Filters are for those that want to have "the best", which as everyone knows is Mobil 1 oil and a Mobil 1 filter.
IMO, Mobil 1 Filters are for those that want to have "the best", which as everyone knows is Mobil 1 oil and a Mobil 1 filter.
Champion makes the M1 filter.
Mobil1 has started using Group III fiber in their filters.
So no, I won't use it.
So no, I won't use it.
Triple_Se7en
$50 Site Donor 2024
Quote:
Mobil1 has started using Group III fiber in their filters.
So no, I won't use it.
General claims by a brand may have little to do with what is actually in a specific filter p/n. Even that is subject to change.
In my study on FL-820S replacements my conclusion was:
M1 210
Probably good flow rate and load-up characteristics using the synthetic-blend media. Absolute filtration may be slightly better than PureONE* and have better flow but at what a price ! I have read some issues about inconsistent pleat spacing and think I could see it on the one I have. If I was doing 7-10K mile OCI then I would feel better using synthetic media.
*They appear to be made by Champion Labs and claim 99.2% under SAE J1858 Multi-Pass Efficiency Test (microns?).
My conclusion: Consider your application but generally PureONE seems more cost effective; almost same filtration at ~50% of price (at least for this p/n class).
In my study on FL-820S replacements my conclusion was:
M1 210
Probably good flow rate and load-up characteristics using the synthetic-blend media. Absolute filtration may be slightly better than PureONE* and have better flow but at what a price ! I have read some issues about inconsistent pleat spacing and think I could see it on the one I have. If I was doing 7-10K mile OCI then I would feel better using synthetic media.
*They appear to be made by Champion Labs and claim 99.2% under SAE J1858 Multi-Pass Efficiency Test (microns?).
My conclusion: Consider your application but generally PureONE seems more cost effective; almost same filtration at ~50% of price (at least for this p/n class).
Clarification: The above * applies to M1 210 as Puralator makes PureONE and they claim 98% multi-pass efficiency (microns?).
- Status
Similar threads
