- Joined
- Jul 2, 2007
- Messages
- 5,293
Excuse the broad and controversial subject line. In regards to the cartridge filter used in the GM Ecotec engine, there recently arose here a thread discussing the O-ring on the anti-drainback nipple on these filters:
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/posts/1151274/
The above thread touched on the fact that the apparent thickness of the anti-drainback O-ring on Supertech and possibly FRAM filters for the Ecotec was smaller than that of the OE Delco PF457G filter and also the Purolator/Proline P15436 filter.
Having both a used Delco PF457G on hand and also a used Proline 15436 on hand I compared the two. As apparent in the photos, the Purolator/Proline had a thicker O-ring. When each was placed into the engine's oil filter canister and seated in the housing properly, (with canister lid not attached) the Purolator/Proline felt like it fit snugger, once both were pressed down to engage the anti-drainback nipple. Photos follow (orange O-ring = Purolator/Proline, green O-ring = Delco/Hengst... both filters marked as Made in USA):
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/posts/1151274/
The above thread touched on the fact that the apparent thickness of the anti-drainback O-ring on Supertech and possibly FRAM filters for the Ecotec was smaller than that of the OE Delco PF457G filter and also the Purolator/Proline P15436 filter.
Having both a used Delco PF457G on hand and also a used Proline 15436 on hand I compared the two. As apparent in the photos, the Purolator/Proline had a thicker O-ring. When each was placed into the engine's oil filter canister and seated in the housing properly, (with canister lid not attached) the Purolator/Proline felt like it fit snugger, once both were pressed down to engage the anti-drainback nipple. Photos follow (orange O-ring = Purolator/Proline, green O-ring = Delco/Hengst... both filters marked as Made in USA):



Last edited: