Originally Posted by pezzy669
I thought I kept it cold at 68!
You might have fun with a Nest thermostat to chase some leafs, I tried for a minute but it was a moving target where my low temp of 68 was good enough for a few weeks to earn a leaf but then was not good enough after that. You would definitely earn all the leafs with a Nest.
Unfortunately, most of our thermostats are line-voltage.
The living room heat was retrofitted with a solenoid, but our use of heat in the living room (and main space) changes every single day. In the middle of winter, we may spend zero hours out there when the days are long and we end them dead tired; we may spend a few hours there, when we feel like watching movies on the bigger TV; we may keep the heat at 70F all day and night long, if we've got people staying over, sleeping on the pull-out or sectional.
I've thought about something like the Nest, but I can't imagine it would have any worth, at least not for what it costs!
Originally Posted by Garak
Originally Posted by gathermewool
Kinda answered your own question: I don't live there. I live here, where both winter and summer temperatures are pretty mild. I get to use my entire house whenever we want, but we PREFER to save money by spending more (not all, mind you) time in the bedroom, where it can be maintained at a much cozier temperature than the rest of the house, so we can save money. I would think that BITOG, of all places, would understand this!
I suppose I'm fortunate that it's not terribly costly to heat here. Of course, certain attempts at efficiency by regulation haven't been so effective. Sitting at my desk next to an incandescent lamp provided some heating, much more effective than an LED or CFL.
Like I mentioned, our first full-month bill in our new house last winter was $570!!!!!!!!!!!!
I will never pay even close to that much ever again, so long as we live here. I plan to do that by:
1. Near-term: limiting heat input into living spaces and spending more time in the bedroom, as mentioned
2. Mid-term: we're currently working on adding solar panels to our entire south-facing roof.
3. mid-to-long-term: adding/upgrading insulation.
I'd be happy to pay $250/month with the heat set at 65F all day long, but that's currently not the case.j
To be honest, I'm not sure I wouldn't continue the same practices I currently am, even if I was able to significantly reduce my monthly electric bill. 55-60F doesn't bother me and the extra money saved would still go toward better things, such as nicer vacations, as infrequent as they are. I also like gizmos, so it would be much easier to justify a gizmo that costs a few hundo, if we were saving hundreds monthly on our electricity bill. I think that makes pretty good sense.
//
The same principle goes toward vehicles, as I mentioned. I bundle up and don't use heat on my 11 mile commute to work, even if it's 0F out, which allows the engine to get up to full operating temperatures; this allows for better mileage and likely helps with oil longevity and minimizes warm-up wear. Note: my garage usually stays 20F > outside.
My wife's vehicle probably sees much more severe service, since she's the one toting around our little ones. I'm fine with getting 30+ MPG in my Legacy, while her mileage is down in the low 20's. It is what it is, and that's fine.