Plumbing house repipe, copper or PEX?

Present house is all copper, it is 125 years old. Pretty sure it was retrofitted with indoor plumbing in the late 40s. Over the last couple of years I have had to replace the cast iron drain pipes and the lead drains but the copper water pipe has never had an issue.
Our under construction retirement home is PEX, not sure I could afford to finish the house if I went with copper these days.
 
The reno has expanded beyond master bath and plumbing, will now be in the $30k range. Wife wanted basement redone and a half bath down there. Ugh. Not finishing the ceiling in basement, it will look better and be more functional at getting to things than having a drop ceiling. The job will likely be done last week of July and first week of August.

Pretty sure I'm just going to do copper pro-press for the vast majority of it, except for in-wall stuff (such as from basement up to shower) will be PEX. Only $1000 price difference copper vs PEX. All of our lines to sinks are through the floor, not wall. I've seen a lot more fear mongering about pro-press failing than actual reports of it doing so.
 
Copper in our house is 55 years old. I had one spot spring a pinhole leak last year but otherwise it has been great. Granted, our city water is neutral and old copper was thicker than the new stuff.

Remodels and rework in my house are part of a gradual conversion to PEX. It's good stuff.

With copper, you can size runs according to the ID of the pipe, and the fittings are largely negligable. With PEX, you SHOULD use as few fittings as possible and size according to the ID of the fittings on any given run. Note, high velocity (throttling) through fittings makes a run noisy.

There are good PEX jobs, and there are cheapo jobs, where they undersize everything and use plastic fittings. Use brass and size accordingly and it's a good system. Even better if you PEX-A and do expansion fittings. Make sure you consider growth/contraction of the lines and take appropriate measures to keep them from being noisy as they cycle.

One nice thing about PEX is that it is flexible. You can completely avoid in-wall fittings with some planning ahead. (Shower/tub valves are really the only exception.) I hate walking through a basement and seeing completely avoidable pex 90s everywhere, knowing there's a bazillion questionable and flow restricting crimps behind the drywall.

My biggest issue with PEX is that it allows low skill plumbers to create a really junky but leak-free product with a minimum of overhead (tools) to get into the trade. Fast and cheap. But I guess that's the case with PVC/CPVC too. Copper sweating at least required some skill and planning.
 
Last edited:
That is pex B. PEX a doesn't have Any clamps.
Not correct. You can use A or B tubing with clamped/crimped fitting strategies.

Expansion fittings can only be done with A.

A tubing is more flexible, more kink resistant, and can do a tighter bend radius without collapse. It's nicer to work with than B...but can be terminated with clamps/crimps just the same if expansion methods are not in the cards. Expansion is the superior product, but crimps/clamps have their place.
 
Last edited:
  • Helpful
Reactions: GON
Back
Top Bottom