Color difference is likely not an indicator of the OE's dirtiness. Your Venza's factory filter had activated carbon impregnated into it to reduce odors in the cabin. The replacement filter plainly lacks the activated carbon feature.
Color difference is likely not an indicator of the OE's dirtiness. Your Venza's factory filter had activated carbon impregnated into it to reduce odors in the cabin. The replacement filter plainly lacks the activated carbon feature.
Maybe, but non-carbon filters can still look like the first one after awhile
From looking on Toyota's part site, it seems like they do offer both versions at the parts counter
87139-58010 is the charcoal
87139-YZZ37 is the white non-carbon version
Color difference is likely not an indicator of the OE's dirtiness. Your Venza's factory filter had activated carbon impregnated into it to reduce odors in the cabin. The replacement filter plainly lacks the activated carbon feature.
Maybe, but non-carbon filters can still look like the first one after awhile
From looking on Toyota's part site, it seems like they do offer both versions at the parts counter
87139-58010 is the charcoal
87139-YZZ37 is the white non-carbon version
Yes and no ... I doubt that non-carbon filters would get dirty and have the evenness of discoloration across the entire filter. But yes, a dirty filter could look quite similar.
Color difference is likely not an indicator of the OE's dirtiness. Your Venza's factory filter had activated carbon impregnated into it to reduce odors in the cabin. The replacement filter plainly lacks the activated carbon feature.
I kind of hate how both my old 03 and 05 gmc's don't have a cabin air filter when the 99-02 did. But the 03-06 refresh got rid of it as d*mn government motors somehow found a way to make an extra 4.318 cents of profit on each one. Have to turn the ac off when driving on my dirt roads if there's someone in front of me kicking up dust.