Originally Posted By: surfstar
The Ridgeline is truck as much as a unibody is now an SUV. Durango and Explorers come to mind.
Diehards will argue either way, claiming a box frame needs to be used for an SUV or a Truck. The auto engineers don't always agree with the public.
The Ridgeline is 90% truck for 90% of the market. Very few need more than that. That's what Honda set out to originally accomplish. Enough truck, not too much.
I'd still like something that gets 30mpg with the same amount of utility/size of the original. Maybe someday that will happen and I'll replace my Vue.
You're 100% right. It is a very good truck, and would make a good match for many people. Problem is, they can't get 90% of the market to touch it with a stick. What was the market share of the first gen? 1.6%?
I admire Honda for attempting to convince people they need to be more practical in their truck selection, but this is America.
This is beginning to remind me of the 1950's and 1970's, when all sorts of flops were sent into the market on the basis of "this is what you should be buying instead of what you like".
I think it's a good idea for people who look at their Accords and wish they had an open bed for those trips to IKEA, HD, tree farm, etc., but the public doesn't seem to take to that when they get a look at that sticker advertising fuel economy and price.
With the Eco-models of full size trucks hitting the market and meeting or exceeding fuel economy of this truck, it's a hard sell from a brand known for making exactly zero iconic trucks.
Good truck or not, the Ridgeline, much like the 5-door Accord, 1st Gen RDX, and the Acura ZDX is proving itself to be the answer to a question that almost nobody asked.
The Ridgeline is truck as much as a unibody is now an SUV. Durango and Explorers come to mind.
Diehards will argue either way, claiming a box frame needs to be used for an SUV or a Truck. The auto engineers don't always agree with the public.
The Ridgeline is 90% truck for 90% of the market. Very few need more than that. That's what Honda set out to originally accomplish. Enough truck, not too much.
I'd still like something that gets 30mpg with the same amount of utility/size of the original. Maybe someday that will happen and I'll replace my Vue.
You're 100% right. It is a very good truck, and would make a good match for many people. Problem is, they can't get 90% of the market to touch it with a stick. What was the market share of the first gen? 1.6%?
I admire Honda for attempting to convince people they need to be more practical in their truck selection, but this is America.
This is beginning to remind me of the 1950's and 1970's, when all sorts of flops were sent into the market on the basis of "this is what you should be buying instead of what you like".
I think it's a good idea for people who look at their Accords and wish they had an open bed for those trips to IKEA, HD, tree farm, etc., but the public doesn't seem to take to that when they get a look at that sticker advertising fuel economy and price.
With the Eco-models of full size trucks hitting the market and meeting or exceeding fuel economy of this truck, it's a hard sell from a brand known for making exactly zero iconic trucks.
Good truck or not, the Ridgeline, much like the 5-door Accord, 1st Gen RDX, and the Acura ZDX is proving itself to be the answer to a question that almost nobody asked.
Last edited: