Thanks man!I have a case of the 0w-30 on order. Will post a VOA soon.
Here's a link for others: https://www.amsoil.com/p/sae-0w-30-ms-synthetic-european-motor-oil-eot/?zo=515729
Thanks man!I have a case of the 0w-30 on order. Will post a VOA soon.
The problem you have isn't your slavish addiction to approvals, it's your blindness to the fact that oil companies can actually make better oils than a manufacturer recommends. If you can't even acknowledge this as a possibility, then why do you even come to BITOG? Just use approved oils.True. However, what about MB229.51/52 etc. They threw a lot of approvals that are contrary to each other. In practice, it might not matter. But their marketing is absolutely shameless.
Ok. I said usually, but I guess I supposed to be more specific.Must have missed it in your rantings
Of the three oils with approvals, only one of them has a single manufacturer's approvals, the other two have approvals from 3 and 2 different OEM's respectively, so I don't think it's fair to claim they usually only have one approval, that strikes me as unnecessary, and intentionally inflammatory, hyperbole.
Approvals are minimum requirements. Approvals are not denied bcs. oil doesn’t meet that minimum requirement and it exceeds.The problem you have isn't your slavish addiction to approvals, it's your blindness to the fact that oil companies can actually make better oils than a manufacturer recommends. If you can't even acknowledge this as a possibility, then why do you even come to BITOG? Just use approved oils.
The whole point?The whole point of approvals is precisely to protect customers from companies like Amsoil.
Just curious, what's wrong with the Mobil ESP oil?The 0w-30 fills a great void for people like myself who need the 0w rating for my winters and don’t want to buy a Mobil ESP oil.
It would be nice to have the 0w-30 approved, but maybe that will be coming soon.
Yes. The whole idea behind approvals was for customers to know that that oil is approved for their vehicle.The whole point?
OK. Wow. Your opinion changed!![]()
Except knowing it actually conforms to all these specifications by being approved oil?Just curious, what's wrong with the Mobil ESP oil?
Thanks, nothing wrong with supporting something you believe in. I thought you found something wrong with the ESP oil, which is why I asked. I'm sure your car will do just fine with Amsoil in the sump.Nothing wrong with it. I just choose to support a company founded by a veteran and not a large company.
Approvals aren't a revenue stream for European automakers. If a blender wants a approval they pay for the testing. Automakers aren't in the business of conducting tests free of charge for every blend which figuratively walks through the door.How come the Europeans go overboard on oil approvals and don't have approvals for filtration? (Emissions aside)
What good is any oil if the filtration is suspect? The oil filter approval licensing would be another revenue stream for them. Recommend is not approved. Are they simply in cahoots with big oil?
As @edyvw has said numerous times the approvals mentioned under the 0w30 have characteristics which conflict with each other. The only one I see LL01FE(2018) vs the others. Per Lubrizol the min TBN for LL01FE is 9.5. The TBN for the 0w30 is 8.4. How do you square that? Is Amsoil blending to an revised BMW cert which Lubrizol hasn't added to their performance tool? I'm genuinely curious.The problem you have isn't your slavish addiction to approvals, it's your blindness to the fact that oil companies can actually make better oils than a manufacturer recommends. If you can't even acknowledge this as a possibility, then why do you even come to BITOG? Just use approved oils.
Nobody claimed otherwiseAutomakers aren't in the business of conducting tests free of charge for every blend which figuratively walks through the door.
Starting TBN is almost meaningless in 2023. While 8.4 v 9.5 seems like a relatively large difference, all motor oils drop to below 6-7 (most lower) within a few hundred miles and it means what? Not much at all.As @edyvw has said numerous times the approvals mentioned under the 0w30 have characteristics which conflict with each other. The only one I see LL01FE(2018) vs the others. Per Lubrizol the min TBN for LL01FE is 9.5. The TBN for the 0w30 is 8.4. How do you square that? Is Amsoil blending to an revised BMW cert which Lubrizol hasn't added to their performance tool? I'm genuinely curious.
On a side note the HTHS is fine because 3.5 is the min or max for all of the certs listed. (LL01FE has a max of 3.5)
Because oil is good for a lot of things, not just SAPS level or HT/HS as being discussed here. Things like deposit formation, ring sticking, sludge formation, shear stability, elastomer compatibility, foaming resistance, etc. Plenty of things to worry about with oil in and of itself, filters are another set of worries.How come the Europeans go overboard on oil approvals and don't have approvals for filtration? (Emissions aside)
What good is any oil if the filtration is suspect? The oil filter approval licensing would be another revenue stream for them. Recommend is not approved. Are they simply in cahoots with big oil?
Starting TBN is almost meaningless in 2023. While 8.4 v 9.5 seems like a relatively large difference, all motor oils drop to below 6-7 (most lower) within a few hundred miles and it means what? Not much at all.
Discussed here: https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/t...-vs-zinc-in-engine-oils-lake-speed-jr.369667/
I interpreted your comment as implying that oil certs were a revenue stream for automakers so why not add filtration as another.Nobody claimed otherwise