My Auto-RX Experience

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 27, 2004
Messages
2,471
Location
Frankfort, Kentucky
Let me start off by saying that I expected this stuff to work.

Ran it in my Grand Prix. 90K miles. Bought it at 83K. I think a lady owned it. No maintenence records. Castrol GTX 10-30 both times. Used Purolator Premium filters of the 4.3 liter size. Both clean and rinse showed no benefit. Mileage did not change one way or the other. Seat of the pants is not something I am good at, so I cannot say.

Ran it in my ZX6-E. 18K miles. Was in "Great Condition" with "Good Maintenence". Within a month all coolant hoses had to be replaced, and brake fluid and coolant were both brown. Rotella T 5-40 both ways. Supertech 7317 for clean. PureOne 14610 for rinse. Expected a lot of gunk to come out of the engine, as the oil that I originally took out of it looked like straight crude oil. You can see pics of the two filters for the bike here

http://www.jason-long.com/filterchop.htm

Neither filter showed any residue or buildup aside from the metal shavings from cutting it open. No benefit in smoothness, gas mileage, etc. Sprung about 3 leaks, and had to add oil today for the first time since i bought the bike.

Overall, I am not impressed. I can say that it is possible that the Grand Prix was in good shape, because they seem to be easy on oil. I dont' think that I can say that same thing about the bike. Either way I did not see any improvement in either vehicle. I followed the directions given for both uses as close as I could. I dumped 50 miles early on the bike because 3rd was getting slippery.

Could there have been cleaning? Yes
Could there be a magic improvement? Not that I can see. Grand Prix still had varnish on the rockers, and nothing hit me as odd on either change aside from the leaf that landed in the oil while i was changing the bike oil. I sprung a few leaks on the bike. Was it cleaning something, possible, but there is no way of really knowing.

The one fallacy I see in the Auto-RX sale is that if it doesn't work, then the person feels dissapointed. If it works a little, a leak develops, and the person either waits for it to stop, or fixes it. If it really works, then the person is happy. I honestly wouldn't run it again because all I really got out of it was $40 something for the ARX, $50 something for the extra filters and oil that wouldn't otherwise be used, and a few leaks that are dirtying up my garage.

Cliff's Notes

Not impressed.

[ March 19, 2005, 02:16 AM: Message edited by: Shaman ]
 
Looks like their was some sluge around your ADBV.

Also, how about some pics of inbetween the pleast where the sludge usually collaects.
 
quote:

Originally posted by BlazerLT:
Looks like their was some sludge around your ADBV.

Are you referring to the first one in black? That is the metal shavings from cutting it open. Notice how it is only really on one side of the filter.
quote:

Originally posted by BlazerLT:

Also, how about some pics of inbetween the pleats where the sludge usually collaects.


Check for pics, just updated.
I was really impressed with the amount of media. Close inspection of the media showed a few small metal pieces, and some red pieces. The big clumps you see on the left side are parts of the media. I used a saw to get it apart. That stuff is on there

[ March 19, 2005, 02:52 AM: Message edited by: Shaman ]
 
Thanks for doing that.
cheers.gif


Maybe your engine is just not sludged up?

I would take that as a good thing.

You should see my oil with AutoRX now in my engine, already getting dark only after 150 miles.
 
I have had the same overall experience as Shaman.

I decided to give a bottle of AutoRx a try as I had what I thought to be a sticky lifter on my 1998 Volvo V90 with 95K on it. I added the ARx at the last oil change along with Chevron 10-30 and a Mann filter. Well, almost 3K later, I hear the sticky lifter with the same frequency as pre ARx.
Which leads me to believe it's not a sticky lifter but valve deposits. Can't blame the ARx for that...no leaks, but no mileage improvement or other noticeable improvement in engine performance. True, I have not run the 'rinse' cycle yet, but I don't expect much. The oil still looks about what oil at 3K in decent running car should look like. I'm not convincing myself that it looks like Coke syrup.

I'm $25 out and the last thing I'll try is another $25 bottle because it says to if you have 100K on the engine. Wish I had my $25 back.
 
I did an ARX treatment on a 1994 Dodge Shadow 2.5 my daughter gave me and I saw the most cleaning during the rinse phase. The oil got dark fast during the rinse. Over all the little motor was pretty clean inside.
 
I am into the first 1000 miles of the rinse phase with my 99 Dakota R/T...no doubt the rinse phase is when the "gunk/stuff" is being cleaned and filtered.....I really saw very little of that during the cleaning phase 1500 miles.....my biggest hurdle is my absolute desire to change the oil before the 2000 mile rinse phase is complete.....gonna have to go to counseling:)
 
quote:

Originally posted by Peak Master:
I have had the same overall experience as Shaman.

I decided to give a bottle of AutoRx a try as I had what I thought to be a sticky lifter on my 1998 Volvo V90 with 95K on it. I added the ARx at the last oil change along with Chevron 10-30 and a Mann filter. Well, almost 3K later, I hear the sticky lifter with the same frequency as pre ARx.
Which leads me to believe it's not a sticky lifter but valve deposits. Can't blame the ARx for that...no leaks, but no mileage improvement or other noticeable improvement in engine performance. True, I have not run the 'rinse' cycle yet, but I don't expect much. The oil still looks about what oil at 3K in decent running car should look like. I'm not convincing myself that it looks like Coke syrup.

I'm $25 out and the last thing I'll try is another $25 bottle because it says to if you have 100K on the engine. Wish I had my $25 back.


Are you still in the cleaning phase, or have you done the rinse phase? The rinse phase is where the ARX does all it's work. You may find the sticky lifter goes away then.
 
Well, it is hard sometimes to tell if RX works or not. Depends on the engine & it's condition a bunch I think. On my big 5.8L Club Wagon, gas mileage goes up and the engine is "zippier" after using RX. On my Altima and Maxima, I can't tell a bit of difference.
dunno.gif
 
Use oil analysis and you can "see" the wear reduction, cleaning of insolubles, reduced solids, increased oxidation ( cleaning phase), and reduced nitration as combustion efficiency increases. Volatility stability in flash, and vis decrease.
 
quote:

Originally posted by twistedfinn:

quote:

Originally posted by GarrettSocling:

quote:

Within a month all coolant hoses had to be replaced, and brake fluid and coolant were both brown.

I'm confused!


Me too! What does A-RX have to do with any of this?


This was only to explain the shape that the bike was in. I was trying to stress that the bike was not treated like the belle of the ball by the previous owner.

If I really wanted to blame something on the hoses failing it would either be the coolant, the water, or the LC.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Terry:
Use oil analysis and you can "see" the wear reduction, cleaning of insolubles, reduced solids, increased oxidation ( cleaning phase), and reduced nitration as combustion efficiency increases. Volatility stability in flash, and vis decrease.

I have considered it on the bike, but my overseas trip has delayed it for a year.
 
Junior Member
Member # 5776

Icon 1 posted March 25, 2005 02:51 PM Profile for jagxjr Send New Private Message Edit/Delete Post Reply With Quote I am sharing my great experience so far with Auto-RX.


I have had outstanding results with Auto-RX so far on my 1995 Aurora. I just had my oil & filter changed yesterday for my 1500 miles. The engine runs so much smoother now, it is just unbelievable. It used to smoke a little bit on start-up, but not anymore. It always had that deep V8 growl and its even deeper now and it revs effortlessly. Before if I wanted to go fast I had to floor the accelerator. I cant wait to see what it is going to be like after 2 or 3k. Its going to take me probably til winter to put that on, but I will keep you posted.

I also use this on my Craftsman Lawn Tractor that had extremely poor maintenance (2 year oil change intervals....150 hours) and my mom's Ford Explorer, and also the Jaguar. I will be using it in my Push Mower once the cutting season starts soon too. That thing is a smoke stack.

I would recommend this product to anyone. Those that have sludge problems with their engines or wants to have their motor as clean as possible, should try this out. This will do the job just right. For only $23 a bottle, you just can't beat it either. Its worth it.

Many Thanks go to Frank, the inventor and everyone who reads my post.
 
The above from a post below this one. Auto-Rx in cleaning mode is not going to show much. It is after rinse mode that you see benefits.It is a non hazdorus chemistry and the applications are
concise and available on the www.autorx.com website.

Auto-Rx works if you work it.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Frank:
The above from a post below this one. Auto-Rx in cleaning mode is not going to show much. It is after rinse mode that you see benefits.It is a non hazdorus chemistry and the applications are
concise and available on the www.autorx.com website.

Auto-Rx works if you work it.


I am sure it cleaned something, but there were no positive effects in either vehicle. I did get some slipping clutch at about 750 miles, and now have 4 different leaks on the ground.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Shaman:

Could there have been cleaning? Yes
Could there be a magic improvement? Not that I can see. Grand Prix still had varnish on the rockers, and nothing hit me as odd on either change aside from the leaf that landed in the oil while i was changing the bike oil. I sprung a few leaks on the bike. Was it cleaning something, possible, but there is no way of really knowing.

The one fallacy I see in the Auto-RX sale is that if it doesn't work, then the person feels dissapointed. If it works a little, a leak develops, and the person either waits for it to stop, or fixes it. If it really works, then the person is happy. I honestly wouldn't run it again because all I really got out of it was $40 something for the ARX, $50 something for the extra filters and oil that wouldn't otherwise be used, and a few leaks that are dirtying up my garage.

Cliff's Notes

Not impressed.


I think you hit it on the head. It seems to work great for some people, but not others. Could it be that it's just simply not needed in some engines? All my high mileage GM engines look clean on the inside, regardless of maintenance.

-T
 
I thought I'd add, that I plan on using the rest of my Auto-RX in my transmission, and I will consider purchasing it again if I feel it is needed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom