Originally Posted By: ryansride2017
I just can't get past the horsepower/quarter mile times. The Camaro having nearly 100 more H.P. but being only .1 quicker in the quarter mile cannot be totally explained with a 300 lbs difference between the two. In my opinion, this is a real disappointment for G.M. and Camaro fans. I would take the Mustang too...there's something about knowing that the energy output of your car is more efficiently used than something that has that amount of driveline loss.
No they were talking about 0-60 times. The mustang GT is nowhere near as fast in the 1/4 as the SS. To keep it simple and not argue well so and so will drive it faster. The SS per C&D goes 13 flat @ 111mph, and the 2010 MGT goes 13.6@104mph.
However we all know people are capable of destroying cag mag times, so I'd imagine the SS will see faster 1/4 mile times. The Mustang, not so sure about. I remember one mag tested the GT in previous years go to 13.5s, but you'll find MOST people can barely get them in the 13s.
I just can't get past the horsepower/quarter mile times. The Camaro having nearly 100 more H.P. but being only .1 quicker in the quarter mile cannot be totally explained with a 300 lbs difference between the two. In my opinion, this is a real disappointment for G.M. and Camaro fans. I would take the Mustang too...there's something about knowing that the energy output of your car is more efficiently used than something that has that amount of driveline loss.
No they were talking about 0-60 times. The mustang GT is nowhere near as fast in the 1/4 as the SS. To keep it simple and not argue well so and so will drive it faster. The SS per C&D goes 13 flat @ 111mph, and the 2010 MGT goes 13.6@104mph.
However we all know people are capable of destroying cag mag times, so I'd imagine the SS will see faster 1/4 mile times. The Mustang, not so sure about. I remember one mag tested the GT in previous years go to 13.5s, but you'll find MOST people can barely get them in the 13s.
Last edited: