Mustang Wins

Joined
Nov 16, 2002
Messages
34,606
Location
NJ
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comp...est+page-4.html I think I'd take a Mustang over the new Camaro. I don't like the dashboard in the Camaro. Mustang interior materials are much better. Way to go Ford! Our only hope. lol Took GM way too long to release this car. I like a lot. After reading the review though, I would go with Ford. I like the 370Z better than both. lol
 
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
11,857
Location
PA
That's interesting. I remember seeing a video review that said the Camaro was way better put-together than the Mustang.
 
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
11,857
Location
PA
I keep coming back to the fact that the Mustang GT (with Track Package) out-corners the Camaro SS and isn't that much slower, despite having a live rear axle and a huge horsepower deficit. I hope people realize from this what a difference 300 lbs can make, and start paying attention to how much their car weighs. That'd be another baby step toward cars that don't weigh as much as houses.
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2007
Messages
732
Location
Huntsville, AL
 Originally Posted By: Ben99GT
Next year the Mustang GT gets 400+ HP too: 5.0L DOHC! Take that 370Z.
In a straight line, yes. Around corners, I'd still place my money on the Z. Nothing against the Mustang, I own a '97 GT 'vert, but handling just isn't a 'stang thang... later, b
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Messages
16,122
Location
Santa Barbara, CA
 Originally Posted By: kd5byb
In a straight line, yes. Around corners, I'd still place my money on the Z. Nothing against the Mustang, I own a '97 GT 'vert, but handling just isn't a 'stang thang... later, b
i had a 98 mustang GT that would put that theory to shame.
 

OVERKILL

$100 Site Donor 2021
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
47,089
Location
Ontario, Canada
 Originally Posted By: d00df00d
That's interesting. I remember seeing a video review that said the Camaro was way better put-together than the Mustang.
From all the recalls and [censored] taking place with the Camaro right after its launch, I would definitely doubt the validity of that review....
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
5,295
I'll take a BMW Z4 M Coupe. Not that its necessarily faster and all that, but just because the Z4 coupe has to be the most sexeh car I've seen lately. As for the subj topic, I'll take the Mustang GT over the new Camaro.
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2002
Messages
2,759
Location
CarMax
I checked out several Camaros at the recent F-Body Gathering. The base Camaro V6 has a rather plain interior, decent plastics, nice fit and finish but not too snazzy. The more upscale SS interior with 2-tone leather has more style. Exterior wise, the car is pretty big, easy to get in and out, comfy seats and good sized doors. A nice car for big guys. The exterior styling is a definite home run. I really think the Camaro will age well and look great 10 years from now. It has a great deal of presence and is stylish without being trendy. Very very nice. Still, if a Mustang was parked next to a Camaro for an A>B comparo, I'm not sure how well the Chevy would do. The Mustang is equally stylish in & out and to me has a more usable interior. Hard to beat that combo.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
379
Location
Mi
The new Camaro is ugly too and the designer needs to go back to the drawing board.I do not like the looks of it
 

buster

Thread starter
Joined
Nov 16, 2002
Messages
34,606
Location
NJ
Ford did a nice job with the Mustang. GM took too long to release this car and failed to make it better than the competition. Every Retro car GM has made has been a dismal failure. GTO, SSR.. Can someone also explain why GM interiors have SUCKED for the last 15 years or maybe more? Is it that hard to make a nice interior? If you can't design one, can you at least copy one from another vehicle! Ridiculous.
 
Joined
Feb 9, 2006
Messages
6,902
Location
Louisiana
 Originally Posted By: buster
Can someone also explain why GM interiors have SUCKED for the last 15 years or maybe more? Is it that hard to make a nice interior? If you can't design one, can you at least copy one from another vehicle! Ridiculous.
Amen! My Odyssey and CR-V interiors are dull but I would still put them up against anything the General makes... Oddly enough, I'd have to say I I kinda liked the switchgear of the last Grand Prix....
 
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
465
Location
Ft Lauderdale Fl
Make mine 6- speed , with the EcoBoost V-6 and 350hp With its lower weight,it'll be a mighty fine corner-carver and still return mileage in the upper 20's
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
3,730
Location
SE PA
 Originally Posted By: LoneRanger
I'll take a BMW Z4 M Coupe. Not that its necessarily faster and all that, but just because the Z4 coupe has to be the most sexeh car I've seen lately. As for the subj topic, I'll take the Mustang GT over the new Camaro.
+1. But I'd rather have the droptop.
 
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
1,225
Location
SW Michigan
 Originally Posted By: wafrederick1
The new Camaro is ugly too and the designer needs to go back to the drawing board.I do not like the looks of it
funny that the current mustangs have had their front face squished up to closely resemble the new camaro... I'll take the camaro... I've been in quite a few different cars over the years, and I guess to me, I don't see some's obession with interior. To me as long as it doesn't creak, and is somewhat ergonomic, I don't care if it's plastic or a whole bunch of leather. As far as big, everything's getting big these days. I thought my Body on Frame Roadmaster was big at 4300lbs, coupes these days are pushing that kind of weight.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
1,197
Location
The coal hills of eastern PA
I just can't get past the horsepower/quarter mile times. The Camaro having nearly 100 more H.P. but being only .1 quicker in the quarter mile cannot be totally explained with a 300 lbs difference between the two. In my opinion, this is a real disappointment for G.M. and Camaro fans. I would take the Mustang too...there's something about knowing that the energy output of your car is more efficiently used than something that has that amount of driveline loss.
 
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
10,910
Location
Nokesville, VA
 Originally Posted By: d00df00d
I hope people realize from this what a difference 300 lbs can make, and start paying attention to how much their car weighs. That'd be another baby step toward cars that don't weigh as much as houses.
I've heard the best performance gain you can make to your car is to go on a diet.
 
Top