You signed up yesterday, but apparently you haven't been reading this forum for over 10 years. Maybe if you go back and read every thread starting around 2014 and seeing the photis of torn filters postrd up, you might have a different viewpoint. Go do some searching.
Not. Interested. It's hysterical hysteria.
I'm a data guy.
Let's say there's been 50 reported "torn" filter media in the 15 years you're citing... that's 3 per year.... Can you show a single engine failure as a result. A confirmed proven result where the company paid for a new engine destroyed by this torn filter media. Unlikely.
Weigh that against:
Five star reviews with over 3200 users, just on Amazon. Probably 50 million vehicles using the 820S nationwide. Major company stamping its name on it. Endorsed and recommended by Ford to use Motorcraft filter specically by the model and maker.
I just looked at both my Ford owners maintenance manuals. My 2002 Crown Vic and 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis (combined 225k miles, presumably a lot of those on the MC820 filter) have identical language stating:
"It is recommended you use the appropriate Motorcraft oil filter (or another brand meeting Ford specifications) for your engine application."
So, here's a question. Ford originally had these under some form of warranty, probably 3 or 5 years, tens of thousands of miles. Their engineers designed all aspects of this engine and filter. They were financially interested in making the best product at a reasonable price. And ultimately on the hook if their 10s of millions of Police Cars, Taxis, personal civilian cars, and Town Cars and Trucks grenaded due to bad filters.
So is Ford, heavily financially invested to hundreds of billions of dollars, wrong? Or are the haters of the MC820S with phantom issues wrong?