motorcraft 5w20 synthetic blend

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd run 5W-30 or 10W-30 if I wanted to jump up in viscosity from a 5W-20.

If I wanted to make a big jump I would consider a 15W-40, or blend a quart of 15W-40 in with a few 5W-30's to thicken things up a little.

I think 20W-50 is like "molasses" and unless the oils temperatures are very high -- a 50 weight is too high a viscosity and would provide no real advantage over a 40 weight like a 15W-40.
 
Quote:
I am little confused by your calculation. Since the viscosity is figured at 32 degree's for the "winter" weight (5 vs 20 weight) and 212 degree's Fahrenheit ( 20 vs 50 weight), I don't see how a 5w-20 can be thicker then the 20w-50 weight at any same given temp.


I merely pointed out that if, as you suggest, a 20w-50 would harm his engine due to tight clearances ..and let us for the moment that he is operating in a 95F environment over the summer. Oh ..he may get a dip to 85 on occasion ..but his standard temp during the summer is 95F ..now if you look at the 40C spec's of a 20w-50 ..you'll see the 104F viscosity. Now just dial in the temp that makes a typical 5w-20 THAT SAME VISC ..and you're looking at 50F. Hence, if a 20w-50 is going to harm his engine with him starting at (near enough) to 95F ...then the EXACT SAME liabilities are experienced by EVERY 5w-20 user at 50F.

Do they have troubles with their HLA's and whatnot?

No, they don't. So, WITH THE QUALIFICATION of limited starting temp usage, he's at NO RISK of the things you alleged. That is, unless 50F starters also suffer from that (5w-20)oil's use.

Here's what people tend to gloss over. Every oil out there transitions through a very broad span of visc from whatever temps to whatever temps ..from Canada to Texas ..from -40-100f+

That's why when someone says "people have reported problems with VTECH when using a 5w-40" ...I ask "Do they have troubles if they hammer it too early out of the driveway with lighter oils"? Otherwise, what they really mean is "They have trouble until they fully warm up.".


NOW ..and AGAIN, I think that he would use a 5w-20 and be happy and confident. Using a 20w-50 will have him wasting fuel for no good reason churning very heavy oil.
55.gif
 
I have a 1998 f150 4.6 engine and all i can tell you is that all i use in my truck is maxlife 5w30 semi synthetic.Great oil to run in this trucks year round.
 
Originally Posted By: Gary Allan
Quote:
I am little confused by your calculation. Since the viscosity is figured at 32 degree's for the "winter" weight (5 vs 20 weight) and 212 degree's Fahrenheit ( 20 vs 50 weight), I don't see how a 5w-20 can be thicker then the 20w-50 weight at any same given temp.


I merely pointed out that if, as you suggest, a 20w-50 would harm his engine due to tight clearances ..and let us for the moment that he is operating in a 95F environment over the summer. Oh ..he may get a dip to 85 on occasion ..but his standard temp during the summer is 95F ..now if you look at the 40C spec's of a 20w-50 ..you'll see the 104F viscosity. Now just dial in the temp that makes a typical 5w-20 THAT SAME VISC ..and you're looking at 50F. Hence, if a 20w-50 is going to harm his engine with him starting at (near enough) to 95F ...then the EXACT SAME liabilities are experienced by EVERY 5w-20 user at 50F.

Do they have troubles with their HLA's and whatnot?

No, they don't. So, WITH THE QUALIFICATION of limited starting temp usage, he's at NO RISK of the things you alleged. That is, unless 50F starters also suffer from that (5w-20)oil's use.

Here's what people tend to gloss over. Every oil out there transitions through a very broad span of visc from whatever temps to whatever temps ..from Canada to Texas ..from -40-100f+

That's why when someone says "people have reported problems with VTECH when using a 5w-40" ...I ask "Do they have troubles if they hammer it too early out of the driveway with lighter oils"? Otherwise, what they really mean is "They have trouble until they fully warm up.".


NOW ..and AGAIN, I think that he would use a 5w-20 and be happy and confident. Using a 20w-50 will have him wasting fuel for no good reason churning very heavy oil.
55.gif




Not really sure how what your saying is relevant , I am not talking just about start up, most the time the car is running the oil is going to be near full operating temp at that time the oil will be to thick for the lash adjusters.
 
Originally Posted By: BoostFiend
Originally Posted By: Gary Allan
Quote:
I am little confused by your calculation. Since the viscosity is figured at 32 degree's for the "winter" weight (5 vs 20 weight) and 212 degree's Fahrenheit ( 20 vs 50 weight), I don't see how a 5w-20 can be thicker then the 20w-50 weight at any same given temp.


I merely pointed out that if, as you suggest, a 20w-50 would harm his engine due to tight clearances ..and let us for the moment that he is operating in a 95F environment over the summer. Oh ..he may get a dip to 85 on occasion ..but his standard temp during the summer is 95F ..now if you look at the 40C spec's of a 20w-50 ..you'll see the 104F viscosity. Now just dial in the temp that makes a typical 5w-20 THAT SAME VISC ..and you're looking at 50F. Hence, if a 20w-50 is going to harm his engine with him starting at (near enough) to 95F ...then the EXACT SAME liabilities are experienced by EVERY 5w-20 user at 50F.

Do they have troubles with their HLA's and whatnot?

No, they don't. So, WITH THE QUALIFICATION of limited starting temp usage, he's at NO RISK of the things you alleged. That is, unless 50F starters also suffer from that (5w-20)oil's use.

Here's what people tend to gloss over. Every oil out there transitions through a very broad span of visc from whatever temps to whatever temps ..from Canada to Texas ..from -40-100f+

That's why when someone says "people have reported problems with VTECH when using a 5w-40" ...I ask "Do they have troubles if they hammer it too early out of the driveway with lighter oils"? Otherwise, what they really mean is "They have trouble until they fully warm up.".


NOW ..and AGAIN, I think that he would use a 5w-20 and be happy and confident. Using a 20w-50 will have him wasting fuel for no good reason churning very heavy oil.
55.gif




Not really sure how what your saying is relevant , I am not talking just about start up, most the time the car is running the oil is going to be near full operating temp at that time the oil will be to thick for the lash adjusters.


Do cold 5w-20 engines experience HLA issues? The oil is allegedly too high for them too
54.gif


..and all cars running on 5w-20 are operated for 20 minutes and never start @ freezing or below freezing? Do they experience HLA issues? If they don't ..they are seeing conditions that a 20w-50 car can ...in say ..Texas with 75f-100F startup temps.

Let's take "Jake" the retired Crown Vic owner in Frostbite Falls MN. Every day Jake goes to Mom's Apple Pie diner for coffee. It's 6 miles away. He starts his 5w-20 Crown Vic @ -25 and experiences no HLA issues ..even though his 5w-20 is several magnitudes above a 70 weight at startup and, since Mom's is only 6 miles away, only reaches 100F oil temp. He appears to have no HLA issues ..and no one expects him to. Why? Because they say he's using the approved 5w-20 oil.

Now Jake's cousin, Texas Tommy, has the exact same routine, but he lives in Texas, uses 20w-50, and goes to Sally's Spicy Cafe ..same 6miles and he reaches a 150F oil temp. Does he experience HLA issues? Some say that he should ..but he's experiencing the same conditions that Jake is. How can he have these issues if Jake does not?

The relevancy is simple. Anyone who tells you that using one grade will "cause" (fill in the blank) is obviously looking at it from a one dimensional view and not thinking it out to far.

So .....for our OP ...given some seasonal qualification for ambient temps ..why would 20w-50 cause him "issues"??

Now (and for the 3rd time - just to assure you that I feel he should) I think that he should use a 5w-20. His cost savings in fuel kinda make it a good thing.
 
One thing that must be considered is that the engine is not the same at cold , warm, and hot temperatures.
The clearances change .
We can't compare cold engine requirements to hot engine requirements.
 
Somewhat true, but I doubt that the expansion/constriction coefficients are altered all that much. I doubt that your 1/2" (or whatever) oil gallery is appreciably smaller ..nor the outlet on your HLA. Now too heavy an oil (and in the 4.6 engine they did have this issue in some model years with them sticking) your relief valve may be engaged and THAT will surely alter flow to the engine ..and that could surely cause issues. So it would be highly questionable to use a 5w-40 in a diverse climate and assume that everything is peachy.

This is where this kind of school of thought is born. It's not a bad "policy" to form ..but there are holes in it. That's all I'm saying.
21.gif


..but let's just leave it be. I'm perseverating at this point and don't want to have a med change ("they" are watching me
shocked2.gif
)

I do recommend the lightest oil that you can use for the task at hand. In his case, that's the OEM spec'd 5w-20

55.gif
cheers3.gif
 
Originally Posted By: Jim Allen
I don't know much about the 4.2L, which does not have variable cam timing, but I have a little info to share on the modular 4.6, 5.4 and 6.8L Fords, with variable cam timing. Their internal hydraulic parts are calibrated for a 5W20. I have it direct from a Ford powertrain engineer on the modular engine team and a guy who has done extensive tuning work on these engines and has a business doing it, that the wrong viscosity oil changes the operational characteristics of the cam timing mechanism. I don't have a lot of detail to explain why but apparently the farther you get from the calibrated viscosity the farther off nominal the system operates. Perhaps someone with more knowledge could chime in. My conversations with my experts are ongoing so I'll share any further tidbits.


Why then does FoMoCo spec different viscosity oils for these same motors in other various regions around the world? Do the same motors in other countries not run very good because FoMoCo has them using different oil??
 
Originally Posted By: Big Jim
Partly (or even mostly) it has to do with availability. No point in specing 5W20 if it isn't available.


You don't think that part (or even most) of the reason for the 5w20 spec has to do with CAFE standards?
 
Bringing it to market was all about CAFE spec's. Ford spent a bundle to allow themselves to be tested under 5w-20 for the fractional fuel economy numbers that it produced in their gas guzzler profit model.

It doesn't have much to do with the oil's suitability for use. (probably) 80% of the population were using sheared 5w-30 for decades and lived to tell about it
21.gif
 
Originally Posted By: bamorris2
Originally Posted By: Big Jim
Partly (or even mostly) it has to do with availability. No point in specing 5W20 if it isn't available.


You don't think that part (or even most) of the reason for the 5w20 spec has to do with CAFE standards?


ive bugged my MC rep about that, and they admitted that it was purely for mileage reasons. there are no internal differences in the motors in terms of bearing clearance between the years.
 
20w-50 is an archaic oil in the context of modern engines. If you are really terrified of 5W-20, then use a 5W-30 ... but jumping to 20W-50 is just silly.

Now if you are running a 1960s Porsche air cooled engine on the track, different story.
 
Originally Posted By: bamorris2
Originally Posted By: Big Jim
Partly (or even mostly) it has to do with availability. No point in specing 5W20 if it isn't available.


You don't think that part (or even most) of the reason for the 5w20 spec has to do with CAFE standards?



Sure I do. But this viscosity range has proven effective and safe. Sometimes government regulations drive development that benefits us all. Just because it was developed to help automakers meet a government fuel efficiency regulation does not mean it is bad. What is so bad about that? As a matter of fact I have seen no evedence that 5w20 has ever caused or currently causes shorter engine life and there have been alot of miles driven on this viscosity.

People complain about CAFE, about seat belt regulations, about Airbag systems, about TPMS's.. [censored] I still hear [censored] about emissions equipment. But the truth is all of these regulatory requirements have benefited us all, saved us resources, money, lives and improved our standard of living.
 
Anybody who even thinks about running a 20W-50 weight oil in a modern FoMoCo Modular OHC engine is totally whacked! Kiss your engine good-bye! Especially upon startup & high RPM's! Totally Nuts!
 
Originally Posted By: Gary Allan
It doesn't have much to do with the oil's suitability for use. (probably) 80% of the population were using sheared 5w-30 for decades and lived to tell about it
21.gif

May the 20% who were using sheared 5w-30 but who did not live to tell about it rest in peace.
frown.gif















j/k
13.gif
 
I would like to know if the MC 5w20 that I'm also using can protect an engine as well as a full synthetic (thinking of trying SynPower). It does get awfully hot here too and stop and go traffic and trailer towing really can heat things up even more. We can have months of 100+ temps. I can accept that a thinner oil is needed in my '08 f150 but I would like to ensure that I am using one that will stand up to the heat. I do prefer readily available oils and mainly buy at wally-world.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom