Motorcaft oil and filters

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: SirTanon
Originally Posted By: SirTanon
Originally Posted By: 901Memphis
Motorcraft filters tear in the same spot as the rest of the Purolator lineup. No confidence in them either.


One bad filter does not merit a statement like this. Not at all.

Sure, that one looked bad, and yes, Motorcraft filters are made by Puro, but anyone scanning the oil filter section can clearly see that Puros and MC filters are two very different beasts.

It's been stated before - MC filters are made by Puro, but they are made to Ford specs.

I cut open two FL400s filters this weekend, and I can say without a doubt that they are virtually pristine, as used filters go, and they ran for 7500 miles each. I will be posting pictures this evening.

MC oil is also great stuff.


Okay, I know I said I was going to post filter pics that night, but it took me longer. Got one pic to post here, and I will be posting many more pics tonight under the Oil Filters forum.

This photo is of two Motorcraft FL400s ilters, both run on my 2010 Ford Fusion, and each run for a little over 7500 miles. One had been sitting for about 4 months before I cut it open.

ndwvpe.jpg


On both filters, all pleats maintained strong structural rigidity. While this picture does not show it, both filters were glued at the seam and the seam on each was still holding fast.

Yes, this is indeed just two filters, but considering they were two consecutively run filters, they strongly reinforce my confidence in the product.


Those look great. My guess is the one on the left sat for 4 month?
 
Originally Posted By: mjoekingz28
Are there any reported engine failure with the so-call Tear-O-haters?

I mean like coarse or knocking engine sounds, bad mpg, increased oil consumption, timing chain rattles, bad UOA reports AND so on.?


Never a problem of any type reported here on BITOG.

That doesn't dissuade the Purohaters on this board though.

They are out to sell FRAMs.

Their efforts make Paul Revere's ride look half-hearted and amatuerish.
 
Originally Posted By: Bigdaddyeasy
Originally Posted By: SirTanon
Originally Posted By: SirTanon
Originally Posted By: 901Memphis
Motorcraft filters tear in the same spot as the rest of the Purolator lineup. No confidence in them either.


One bad filter does not merit a statement like this. Not at all.

Sure, that one looked bad, and yes, Motorcraft filters are made by Puro, but anyone scanning the oil filter section can clearly see that Puros and MC filters are two very different beasts.

It's been stated before - MC filters are made by Puro, but they are made to Ford specs.

I cut open two FL400s filters this weekend, and I can say without a doubt that they are virtually pristine, as used filters go, and they ran for 7500 miles each. I will be posting pictures this evening.

MC oil is also great stuff.


Okay, I know I said I was going to post filter pics that night, but it took me longer. Got one pic to post here, and I will be posting many more pics tonight under the Oil Filters forum.

This photo is of two Motorcraft FL400s ilters, both run on my 2010 Ford Fusion, and each run for a little over 7500 miles. One had been sitting for about 4 months before I cut it open.

ndwvpe.jpg


On both filters, all pleats maintained strong structural rigidity. While this picture does not show it, both filters were glued at the seam and the seam on each was still holding fast.

Yes, this is indeed just two filters, but considering they were two consecutively run filters, they strongly reinforce my confidence in the product.


Those look great. My guess is the one on the left sat for 4 month?


I'm curious what it was about that filter vs. the other which lead you to that conclusion.

.. Yes, you're correct, btw.
 
Originally Posted By: hatt
Why would there be engine failures with torn media? Engine failures are not the point. Filters shouldn't have holes in the media.

Politicians should not be crooked...........just saying.
 
Originally Posted By: BlueOvalFitter
Originally Posted By: hatt
Why would there be engine failures with torn media? Engine failures are not the point. Filters shouldn't have holes in the media.

Politicians should not be crooked...........just saying.


Ya and women shouldn't have the right to vote.
eek.gif
I mean uh..i gotta go!
 
Originally Posted By: SilverC6
Originally Posted By: mjoekingz28
Are there any reported engine failure with the so-call Tear-O-haters?

I mean like coarse or knocking engine sounds, bad mpg, increased oil consumption, timing chain rattles, bad UOA reports AND so on.?


Never a problem of any type reported here on BITOG.

That doesn't dissuade the Purohaters on this board though.

They are out to sell FRAMs.

Their efforts make Paul Revere's ride look half-hearted and amatuerish.


Boy ain't that the truth! I've noticed the same thing to a greater extend with a particular brand of oil. I won't even mention the name cuz everyone knows exactly what I'm talking about anyway. Must be lotsa perks being handed out. I would try and get in on it but then I wouldn't sleep with a clear conscience.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom