Originally Posted by ekpolk
Originally Posted by Imp4
. . .
Yes but you know as well as I that the requirement is age based.
Why paint a picture based on your education and former military status?
It's immaterial.
The attendant that you slighted in your original description probably looked at you and quickly came to the conclusion that you weren't a high schooler.
But maybe this was missed in the interaction when you were busy noticing her food addiction as you mentioned.
Lot's of "maybes" there. Glad you were there to watch the whole thing, and know me personally. Oh wait. . . So let's take this apart.
1) Again, I was setting up the visual. If you prefer, let's retro-edit my self-description. I'm 57 years old, 6' tall, 195 lbs, and can still run three miles in under 20 minutes. I can see my shoe laces while standing straight up. I wear my hair short and shave almost every day. There are many, many thousands of men out there who fall into this appearance category. I won't speak for the others, but I'm not often pegged as a drug abuser.
2)
IF the requirement is in fact age-based, then why did this young lady feel the need to quiz me about my plans for the little bottle of Sta-bil? I don't doubt at all that age is a consideration in this scheme. But remember, this is Sta-bil, not booze or cigarettes. If the store wants to sell only to legal adults, then law permitting, all they need to do is say so, and enforce THAT policy. If the jurisdiction sets a legal age to buy, then all they have to do is "card" you. Yet I had to give an explanation of my intentions for the use of the Sta-bil -- that went well beyond age.
3) My "slighting" of the young lady involved was pretty mild here, and
non-existent "on scene". As indicated, I didn't "get into it" with her, none of us know who she is (I don't even recall the name on her lapel tag). Frankly, though, I think she deserved a bit of "gigging", since she wasn't especially tactful, diplomatic or discrete about her standardless interrogation. She really acted as if I must be doing something wrong, buying Sta-bil. Again, if it were "age only" all she had to ask was, "you're over 17, right"? Or just "card" me. That would have been easy. You ever been frustrated and irritated? I was. It happens. Maybe I could have vented better.
4) Why are YOU so rubbed the wrong way about this? Thought I was being pompous? You plainly don't know me at all. I enjoyed my years in the Marines, but I'm VERY happy to be retired from it now. But I still don't look like anybody's druggie. If my mention of military service or status offends you, well, you're entitled to your opinions.
1. Your visual is immaterial. Ironically, many strung out gas huffers can run fast too. This does not implicate you as such, but it goes to point out that your visual really isn't a constructive contribution here.
2.Who knows and who cares? Maybe she was wrong.
3.Nobody said it was a scene. Just using your own words and descriptions.
4. It all comes down to 'Show me your papers'. No matter your education, haircut, ability to run fast, etc....
Why is this any deal at all?!?
Have a nice day!