Well, I'm going to let all of you beat up on me awhile and give old George a rest. I know it may be hard to believe I am standing up for one of my major competitors, but from time to time I just have read enough and feel it is necessary.
I respect each of you and your opinions but sometimes I wonder if you read what you write or listen to what you say. Let me give some examples.
Remember when Mobil 1 SS first came out. Oh how we talked about it not being as good as the old TS formula and Mobil was cutting corners. Well now we eat crow. The SS kicks the TS butt. Another brand: AMSOIL - We know how good this product is but if someone turns in a UOA or VOA that the phos or zinc is a little low, oh no!, they must be cutting corners and it is a lesser product. Another brand: CASTROL SYNTEC - We know what we have done to them concerning Group III, then here comes the almighty Castrol GC, and we have seen some good results with it, now we have changed our minds about the Group III some as we have seen some good UOA with it, now Castrol is back on the good side. No wait a minute, there was the picture of the Honda engine with some cooked oil under the valve cover and something mentioned about a recall in Australia. Now we are not sure. I keep hearing about the holy grail of oil. Guess what, there ain't one. There are a lot of great oils out there, pick one and use it.
I have no clue what kind of PAO'S are in this new Mobil 1R and neither do you. It seems like that everytime someone comes out with something new, it is chalked up to marketing BS. Well to me this is BS.
George is not only a site sponsor, I find him to be very knowledgable and honest and have absolutely no reason to doubt him when he says this is the oil Penske uses.
Now, that's my $.02 worth. I'm through. Good night.
[ January 30, 2004, 12:20 AM: Message edited by: Johnny ]