Mixing Differential fluids 75W-90 and 75W-110

Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
131
Location
Kiev, Ukraine
I want to mix 75W-90 and 75W-110 from Amsoil. The point is that my rear differential actually requires Castrol BOT 720 with a viscosity of 18. W110 has a viscosity of 20, while 75W-90 is 16. As a result, when mixed, it should come out to exactly 18.

What do you think?
 
I don't think this viscosity is Linear which means you cannot average it like average of 5 and 7 equal 6.

They are made to operate within a certain range.
So, if you want to use it, you may want to see the range of the Amsoil product and see which one closer to the Castrol.
 
I want to mix 75W-90 and 75W-110 from Amsoil. The point is that my rear differential actually requires Castrol BOT 720 with a viscosity of 18. W110 has a viscosity of 20, while 75W-90 is 16. As a result, when mixed, it should come out to exactly 18.
How do you know the exact viscosity of the fluids? Grades are ranges and PDS are typical values.
 
I want to mix 75W-90 and 75W-110 from Amsoil. The point is that my rear differential actually requires Castrol BOT 720 with a viscosity of 18. W110 has a viscosity of 20, while 75W-90 is 16. As a result, when mixed, it should come out to exactly 18.

What do you think?
Well, I want to use a slightly thicker fluid because the car has already done 110,000 miles, and possibly the clearances in the components have slightly increased. I want to compensate for this with a slightly (10%) thicker oil.
 
I am currently using Motul Gear300 LS 75w90 with viscosity 16. No problems in principle) but considering that Amsoil has w110 in its line, I want to try it)
 
The standard bitog perspective would apply here. The unit operates (normally, without damage) at viscosities higher than the operating temperature viscosity during the warmup process. As such, being thicker at operating temperate does no harm so long as lube is getting where needed.
 
The standard bitog perspective would apply here. The unit operates (normally, without damage) at viscosities higher than the operating temperature viscosity during the warmup process. As such, being thicker at operating temperate does no harm so long as lube is getting where needed.
Right, and 75WXX is good to 40 below. Colder than that I’m staying in bed.

The pds pour point and lubricant channel point is pretty much the same thing.
So if you want to know the cold limit of a gear lube, look at the pour point for a close guess.
 
Right, and 75WXX is good to 40 below. Colder than that I’m staying in bed.

The pds pour point and lubricant channel point is pretty much the same thing.
So if you want to know the cold limit of a gear lube, look at the pour point for a close guess.
If this logic is sound, and we assume all 75w-XXX are the same at some lower bound (40 below) that is cold enough to be beyond concern and the unit is intended to have operation initiated at this lower bound, using even 75w-140 in a unit that calls for 75w-80 is without risk.

Thus, the OP who wants to move up from 75w-90 can move up to 110 or 140 without concern. (My 11.5" AAM is running 140 and I am likewise without concern. I think the manual calls for cheapo 85w-90.)
 
Last edited:
I want to mix 75W-90 and 75W-110 from Amsoil. The point is that my rear differential actually requires Castrol BOT 720 with a viscosity of 18. W110 has a viscosity of 20, while 75W-90 is 16. As a result, when mixed, it should come out to exactly 18.

What do you think?
On a one-to-one mixing basis, the lower viscosity oil will dominate the viscosity results so you will not get an 18 cSt lube; it just doesn't work that way.

Our temps range from -32F to 95F and the 75W110 I run works very well, so I would use the 75W110 since it has good cold weather performance and excellent film protection at high temps.
 
If this logic is sound, and we assume all 75w-XXX are the same at some lower bound (40 below) that is cold enough to be beyond concern and the unit is intended to have operation initiated at this lower bound, using even 75w-140 in a unit that calls for 75w-80 is without risk.

Thus, the OP who wants to move up from 75w-90 can move up to 110 or 140 without concern. (My 11.5" AAM is running 140 and I am likewise without concern. I think the manual calls for cheapo 85w-90.)
Close enough logic for me.
The last three pails of GL5 I bought were 80w140 for use in a 3500 Ram, two Duramax HD 4x4s, 1500 SLT, 2014 Escape and two GM 2500s the railway owned.
Two times Delo and one Petro-Can.
I’m grabbing another pail of 80w140 for a 2012 F350 with the 6.2 gas engine my son bought last week.
Synthetic 80w140 is expensive enough without looking for oddballs and exotics like 75w110 or 75w140.
 
Last edited:
Synthetic 80w140 is expensive enough without looking for exotics like 75w110 or 75w140.
My "buy" point for valvoline 75w-90 and 75w-140 has been $10 to $12.50, depending on maintenance forecast.

How much less are we talking for Delo 80w-140 by the pail?
 
My "buy" point for valvoline 75w-90 and 75w-140 has been $10 to $12.50, depending on maintenance forecast.

How much less are we talking for Delo 80w-140 by the pail?
That depends if you have commercial accounts at bulk lubricants distributors or not.
I paid $160 Canadian for a 20L pail of 80w140 about 18 months ago.
Multiply that X70% for USD.
 
On a one-to-one mixing basis, the lower viscosity oil will dominate the viscosity results so you will not get an 18 cSt lube; it just doesn't work that way.

Our temps range from -32F to 95F and the 75W110 I run works very well, so I would use the 75W110 since it has good cold weather performance and excellent film protection at high temps.
Advertisement deleted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The standard bitog perspective would apply here. The unit operates (normally, without damage) at viscosities higher than the operating temperature viscosity during the warmup process. As such, being thicker at operating temperate does no harm so long as lube is getting where needed.

IMG_9969.webp
 
Well, how does the viscosity of the 85-140 at 50 C compare to the viscosity of 75-90 at 40C. Or film strength, or whatever lube property governs? If we take the spirax graph at face value, the 75-90 was still climbing.

I guess it's relevant because an axle or transfer case (unlike a trans or engine) is not thermostatically controlled. So if the fluid makes it run hotter, you'll get the fluid properties of the hotter unit.

I will never believe that the dominant source of heat generation inside of an axle is fluid shear, as opposed to bearings rolling/sliding and gear meshes sliding. (Even less so will I ever believe it inside of a transmission or engine with obvious other sources of heat generation/dissipation.)

I do not care if my rear end runs 10 C hotter. I care that the moving parts are well lubricated as it supports tools down the road supporting 6000 pounds, at GCW of 19,500 pounds, safely hauling my family on vacations down the highway. The temperature will be a function of my right foot, terrain, ambient temperature, airflow, etc. I do carry an IR gun in the console and when curious make sure all my trailer brakes are contributing (and not dragging) and when super curious, shoot the back axle.

In my case, an AAM 11.5" has had a variety of lubes specified over its history and depending on the OE using it, TSBs applicable, etc.
 
Last edited:
don’t play backyard chemist. amsoil severe gear is an amazing product, run 75w-90 or 75w-110. don’t mix. either will provide plenty of protection.
 
The video stated that they ran the diff at 3,000 rpm. Assuming a 4:1 gear ratio and a 100 inch od tire, that’s about 71 mph.
One of my trucks, a 2011 Duramax, has averaged 37 mph since new, most of it with 80w140.
The 85w140 in the video is quite a bit thicker, and as a result will warm up faster.
 
Back
Top Bottom