Metal Fiber Filter Medium

Joined
Aug 28, 2024
Messages
5
Some background on me, I have been a filter designer for over 40 years. Primarily designing filters for aerospace applications. Mainly aerospace hydraulic applications although I did design 4 air filters for the B2 Stealth Bomber back in the 80's. I was also the Chairman of the SAE A6C1 Aerospace Hydraulics Filtration and Contaminaion for a number of years. It was at one of our SAE meetings that the US Army approched our group and mentioned that it has been having horrible hydraulic pump failures on their Black Hawk helicopters. There are three hydraulic pumps on each Black Hawk and every year at Fort Rucker in Alabama, they had to change out around 300 pumps because of the bad results they were getting from fully qualified glass fiber filter elements. Now these elements had to pass the most stringent testing of MIL-F-8815 which is an expensive test to run but the Army still suffered from a huge amount of failures due to a highly contaminated hydraulic system. This was also the case with the Apache and Chinook. The Army had some really smart guys however down at Redstone Arsenal in Alabama where the Army Engineering Directorate is stationed. They looked at MIL-F-8815 and realized basically that this is a static flow test. You flow the fluid through the element at a constant flow rate and slowly add test dust until the element reaches its terminal differential pressure. Real life is not like this. The flow in real life is dynamic. Everytime the pilot moves the stick or the pedals or any control in the hydraulic system, the flow changes. The Army instrumented one of their helicopters with flow meters, temperature gauges and accelerometers, anything to try and see an accurate picture of what was happenening during flight with the hydraulic filters. They then designed a filter test they called DFE, Dynamic Filtration Efficiency which raised or lowered the flow rate every 5 minutes during the multipass test. So a test running at 20 gpm went down to 15 gpm after 5 minutes and then 5 min later, it went back up to 20 gpm. What they found horrified them, the qualified filters they had been using for years simply broke down and allowed the trapped contaminate to go back into the system. This was the failure issue with these elements. The Army came to our SAE meeting and asked the aerospace filter companies present if they had a media that was resistant to this dynamic failure. Well, at the time, I worked for a British filter company that had no business with the US Army (but really wanted to get into that business). We had been using a material called sintered metal fiber. It was a random mat of 316L stainless steel fibers all sintered together into a pleatable filter media. This stainless filter media ranged from 3 micron up to 100 micron in filtration rating. Since it was 100% stainless steel, it could take any temperature that stainless could handle, any chemicals stainless could handle and it could be welded or assembled by epoxy into a filter element. The only problem with metal fiber is that it is more EXPENSIVE than glass fiber media. We talked to the Army and they had us manufacture a series of metal fiber elements for the Apache and Black Hawk and in order to put them on a helicopter we had to get them qualified. This proved to be fairly easy as the metal fiber media was much stronger than the glass fiber and had no media migration or fibers coming off the element media and going into the system. Once qualified, the Army placed these elements on the Apache and Black Hawk helicopters and performed 36,000 flight hours. What they found was a 10X reduction in maintenance. They went from losing 300 pumps the first year to 25 the next year and then none the third year.

Now why have I put all this text into a forum that has to do with automobile filters? Well, I thought that if this material does so well in aerospace, lets try it on a car. So I purchased a spin on housing from System1Filters for my 2018 Nissan Rogue Hybrid and had a metal fiber element made by one of my customers. The result, well so far I have driven 50K miles with the same filter element. After one year, I changed out the Mobil 1 oil since the acid number started to creep up but have not removed the filter. I send a fluid sample out to Wearcheck labs in Cary, NC every 6,000 miles to see how things are doing. New Mobil 1 is very dirty. It is around ISO 4406 Code 23/21/18. My car has stayed around 18/16/13 throughout the test which is cleaner than new oil. Actually, the last test I did a few weeks go the level dropped a little more which means that the smaller holes in the filter are getting plugged but the filter has not gone into bypass as metal fiber has a huge dirt capacity. When it does reach the time I want to change it out, I will send the element to Carolina Filters in Sumter, SC for cleaning and return it back to the car. Metal fiber is cleanable and reusable and can be completely recycled as it is 100% SST.
Anyway, below is a photo of metal fiber media showing the sinter bonds on each fiber. There are no glues or binders in this media and it has a super high porosity of around 80%. I used to work for Bekaert Corporation who makes this media but no longer do.


1724875402424.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What is the single and multi-pass efficiency of this media?

When it does reach the time I want to change it out, I will send the element to Carolina Filters in Sumter, SC for cleaning and return it back to the car.
Does the media need to be returned to the manufacturer to be cleaned or could it be cleaned by the end user?
 
What is the single and multi-pass efficiency of this media?


Does the media need to be returned to the manufacturer to be cleaned or could it be cleaned by the end user?
The efficiency is the same as with glass fiber media. Check out this video on Youtube from my previous company
It shows a glass fiber element breaking down during dynamic testing. Then a metal fiber element is tested. You can see that it does not break down. This is why the Army helicopter hydraulic systems cleaned up so quickly and stayed clean. The Army saves over $50M per year now in things they don't have to fix. Also check out this video:

we found that upon shutting down a hydraulic system or car, the filter element unloads most of its trapped contaminant back into the system with glass fiber and cellulose elements. This doesn't happen with a metal media.

Cleaning can be done at home or by professionals. The manufacturer does not have any facilities for cleaning of the media. Professionals do a better job however and I will send my car filter out to be cleaned after I finally remove it. Remember, if you have an element with 5 micron media, you need to clean it in a fluid cleaner than 5 micron or you will end up contaminating it more.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The efficiency is the same as with glass fiber media. Check out this video on Youtube from my previous company It shows a glass fiber element breaking down during dynamic testing. Then a metal fiber element is tested. You can see that it does not break down. This is why the Army helicopter hydraulic systems cleaned up so quickly and stayed clean. The Army saves over $50M per year now in things they don't have to fix. Also check out this video: we found that upon shutting down a hydraulic system or car, the filter element unloads most of its trapped contaminant back into the system with glass fiber and cellulose elements. This doesn't happen with a metal media.

Cleaning can be done at home or by professionals. The manufacturer does not have any facliites for cleaning of the media. Professionals do a better job however and I will send my car filter out to be cleaned after I finally remove it. Remember, if you have an element with 5 micron media, you need to clean it in a fluid cleaner than 5 micron or you will end up contaminating it more.

Which is?
 
Some background on me, I have been a filter designer for over 40 years. Primarily designing filters for aerospace applications. Mainly aerospace hydraulic applications although I did design 4 air filters for the B2 Stealth Bomber back in the 80's. I was also the Chairman of the SAE A6C1 Aerospace Hydraulics Filtration and Contaminaion for a number of years. It was at one of our SAE meetings that the US Army approched our group and mentioned that it has been having horrible hydraulic pump failures on their Black Hawk helicopters. There are three hydraulic pumps on each Black Hawk and every year at Fort Rucker in Alabama, they had to change out around 300 pumps because of the bad results they were getting from fully qualified glass fiber filter elements. Now these elements had to pass the most stringent testing of MIL-F-8815 which is an expensive test to run but the Army still suffered from a huge amount of failures due to a highly contaminated hydraulic system. This was also the case with the Apache and Chinook. The Army had some really smart guys however down at Redstone Arsenal in Alabama where the Army Engineering Directorate is stationed. They looked at MIL-F-8815 and realized basically that this is a static flow test. You flow the fluid through the element at a constant flow rate and slowly add test dust until the element reaches its terminal differential pressure. Real life is not like this. The flow in real life is dynamic. Everytime the pilot moves the stick or the pedals or any control in the hydraulic system, the flow changes. The Army instrumented one of their helicopters with flow meters, temperature gauges and accelerometers, anything to try and see an accurate picture of what was happenening during flight with the hydraulic filters. They then designed a filter test they called DFE, Dynamic Filtration Efficiency which raised or lowered the flow rate every 5 minutes during the multipass test. So a test running at 20 gpm went down to 15 gpm after 5 minutes and then 5 min later, it went back up to 20 gpm. What they found horrified them, the qualified filters they had been using for years simply broke down and allowed the trapped contaminate to go back into the system. This was the failure issue with these elements. The Army came to our SAE meeting and asked the aerospace filter companies present if they had a media that was resistant to this dynamic failure. Well, at the time, I worked for a British filter company that had no business with the US Army (but really wanted to get into that business). We had been using a material called sintered metal fiber. It was a random mat of 316L stainless steel fibers all sintered together into a pleatable filter media. This stainless filter media ranged from 3 micron up to 100 micron in filtration rating. Since it was 100% stainless steel, it could take any temperature that stainless could handle, any chemicals stainless could handle and it could be welded or assembled by epoxy into a filter element. The only problem with metal fiber is that it is more EXPENSIVE than glass fiber media. We talked to the Army and they had us manufacture a series of metal fiber elements for the Apache and Black Hawk and in order to put them on a helicopter we had to get them qualified. This proved to be fairly easy as the metal fiber media was much stronger than the glass fiber and had no media migration or fibers coming off the element media and going into the system. Once qualified, the Army placed these elements on the Apache and Black Hawk helicopters and performed 36,000 flight hours. What they found was a 10X reduction in maintenance. They went from losing 300 pumps the first year to 25 the next year and then none the third year.

Now why have I put all this text into a forum that has to do with automobile filters? Well, I thought that if this material does so well in aerospace, lets try it on a car. So I purchased a spin on housing from System1Filters for my 2018 Nissan Rogue Hybrid and had a metal fiber element made by one of my customers. The result, well so far I have driven 50K miles with the same filter element. After one year, I changed out the Mobil 1 oil since the acid number started to creep up but have not removed the filter. I send a fluid sample out to Wearcheck labs in Cary, NC every 6,000 miles to see how things are doing. New Mobil 1 is very dirty. It is around ISO 4406 Code 23/21/18. My car has stayed around 18/16/13 throughout the test which is cleaner than new oil. Actually, the last test I did a few weeks go the level dropped a little more which means that the smaller holes in the filter are getting plugged but the filter has not gone into bypass as metal fiber has a huge dirt capacity. When it does reach the time I want to change it out, I will send the element to Carolina Filters in Sumter, SC for cleaning and return it back to the car. Metal fiber is cleanable and reusable and can be completely recycled as it is 100% SST.
Anyway, below is a photo of metal fiber media showing the sinter bonds on each fiber. There are no glues or binders in this media and it has a super high porosity of around 80%. I used to work for Bekaert Corporation who makes this media but no longer do.


View attachment 237656
Fascinating info! Thanks for sharing your knowledge. Makes me wonder what could be done with filter media and design such as this along with a bypass tiny micron oil filter setup?
Must be a better way to filter oil than how we do it today.
 
The efficiency is the same as with glass fiber media. Check out this video on Youtube from my previous company
It shows a glass fiber element breaking down during dynamic testing. Then a metal fiber element is tested. You can see that it does not break down. This is why the Army helicopter hydraulic systems cleaned up so quickly and stayed clean. The Army saves over $50M per year now in things they don't have to fix. Also check out this video:

we found that upon shutting down a hydraulic system or car, the filter element unloads most of its trapped contaminant back into the system with glass fiber and cellulose elements. This doesn't happen with a metal media.

This is basically what we call "debris sloughing", and was seen in every filter to some degree that Ascent tested in this thread --->: LINK

As the dP increases, it causes already captured debris (and maybe some filter media fibers) to be released down stream. And any time there is a dP increase period, including cold start-ups or a quick short burst of the engine to redline, there could be debris sloughing. That can be seen in the first YouTube video ... every time the dP went up, the filter lost efficiency due to sloughing.

Some filters hold and retain captured debris better than others. The Fram Ultra and Royal Purple in Ascent's case lost very little efficiency as the filter loaded up and the dP increased. Some filters (Boss and XP) lost a lot of efficiency as the dP increases and it starts sloughing already captured debris down stream.

Lot of people for years always believed that oil filters "get more efficient" as the load up, but that's simply false and a long lived misconception. Air filters however, can become more efficient with loading, but the reason why oil filters doesn't is because the dP across them is huge compared to the dP across an air filter.

Good info in the videos, thanks for posting.
 
The Army should require a long guarantee, that’s a lot of money. Sounded lucrative for the pump manufacturer while it lasted.
 
Does synthetic microfiber, rather than micro glass, suffer from the same downsides in the dynamic testing?
 
Last edited:
What is the single and multi-pass efficiency of this media?

See screenshots below from the video after 45 min on metal and 44 min on fiberglass.

We don't know the micron sizes of either element. The fiberglass initial efficiency is lower and the end of test differential pressure on the microglass is quite a bit lower so I think it is safe to say the metal element tested had a higher micron rating than the fiberglass chosen to compare it to.

But I think the point of the video is the effect on the filter of dynamic pressure.

Metal.webp
Fiberglass.webp
 
See screenshots below from the video after 45 min on metal and 44 min on fiberglass.

We don't know the micron sizes of either element. The fiberglass initial efficiency is lower and the end of test differential pressure on the microglass is quite a bit lower so I think it is safe to say the metal element tested had a higher micron rating than the fiberglass chosen to compare it to.

But I think the point of the video is the effect on the filter of dynamic pressure.

View attachment 243379View attachment 243380
It may be that the wire metal mesh filter doesn't slough off debris as dP goes up like the fiberglass media filter does. That's what it looks like from the graphs.
 
It may be that the wire metal mesh filter doesn't slough off debris as dP goes up like the fiberglass media filter does. That's what it looks like from the graphs.

It's in the video. You can see initial efficiency at static flow when there isn't sloughing off of material.

Changes in flow then do slough off material and then there is recovery, until the next increase in flow.

The implication is that static flow testing of cellulose and microglass media elements overstates efficiency compared to real life results. Andrew mentioned there was a move in the military towards Dynamic Flow testing.
 
Last edited:
It's in the video. You can see initial efficiency at static flow when there isn't sloughing off of material.

Changes in flow then do slough off material and then there is recovery, until the next increase in flow.

The implication is that static flow testing of cellulose and microglass media elements overstates efficiency compared to real life results. Andrew mentioned there was a move in the military towards Dynamic Flow testing.
Re: bold part ... yes and no. The dP sloughing effect is still seen in ISO 4548-12, and the way ISO 4548-12 is done is fine for comparing filter efficiency to each other - it wouldn't have stayed in world wide use for over 25 years if it wasn't. There are in-field studies that show a strong correlation of in lab (ISO) efficiency testing to oil cleanliness level in real world use conditions. As the dP increased during the test, a drop in efficiency is seen ... just like in these mini increased dP events in the testing in this thread. Those mini dP events (due to increased flow) makes the media slough debris, then when the dP goes down the filter cleans up the sloughing event.

As I've said many times, filters that rate high in the ISO 4548-12 efficiency means they are low debris sloughers with increased dP. That's good regardless of how loaded up they are. The better they can hold already debris from sloughing off, the better.
 
Last edited:
As I've said many times, filters that rate high in the ISO 4548-12 efficiency means they are low debris sloughers with increased dP. That's good regardless of how loaded up they are. The better they can hold already debris from sloughing off, the better.

If your filter is sloughing particles, make sure it is a high efficiency filter that sloughs particles.
 
If your filter is sloughing particles, make sure it is a high efficiency filter that sloughs particles.
That's better for leaky leaf springs, lol. The higher the filter's ISO efficiency is means it can't be much of a debris slougher. The OG Ultra in Andrew's ISO test barely lost any efficiency from new to fully loaded. Not many filters can do that. On reason the Boss and Wix XP have such bad efficiency is because they slough a lot, and lose a lot of efficiency as they load up. And some people will run them a long time which just means they are loading it more and putting it more into sloughing territory.
 
Fascinating info! Thanks for sharing your knowledge. Makes me wonder what could be done with filter media and design such as this along with a bypass tiny micron oil filter setup?
Must be a better way to filter oil than how we do it today.
What are you meaning by a bypass tiny micron oil filter?
 
Think he's referring to a spin-on filter design with part of it being high efficiency that acts like a built-in bypass filter. The "Microgreen" brand filters were that way. Don't think they are made anymore.

REFERENCE THREAD LINK
One of my customers in Arkansas wanted to make spin on filters for a trucking company. They purchased a spin on canning machine from a company called Bubber in India. We purchased competitors filters for testing purposes to see what micron rating they were and how they performed. In several tests, we found that once the element got up to 16 psi differential, the media ripped open and the contaminant was allowed to go back into the engine and recirculate. Below is the graph comparing a celllulose spin on oil filter to a metal fiber element. At the time that the cellulose element failed, the celllulose dirt capacity was only 12.6 grams of contaminant. The metal fiber element had loaded to 40.1 grams at 16.3 psid. If the cellulose element had not failed, we estimated that it would hold only around 13 or so grams. The metal fiber element would end up holding around 61.2 grams of contaminant. That is why I have been able to drive over 50K miles without an oil change. My oil is still much cleaner than new oil. The red line is cellulose and the purple is metal fiber. The bottom graph shows the estimated cellulose dirt capacity if the element had not failed.

1728165659962.webp


1728165826889.webp
 
We purchased competitors filters for testing purposes to see what micron rating they were and how they performed. In several tests, we found that once the element got up to 16 psi differential, the media ripped open and the contaminant was allowed to go back into the engine and recirculate.
We know all about filter media tearing here, but typically it's because of wide pleat spacing combined with weak brittle media that allows the dP from oil flow to bend the pleats sideway and make the media tear at the root ends of the pleats.
 
We know all about filter media tearing here, but typically it's because of wide pleat spacing combined with weak brittle media that allows the dP from oil flow to bend the pleats sideway and make the media tear at the root ends of the pleats.
Yes, exactly. The sad thing about this is the owner never knows when this happens. They may be driving for thousands of miles and not know they have an oil filter which is bypassing the oil around the filter. Engines seem to run many miles with bad filtration. Just think about how far they would run with good filtration. You would probably get sick of the car or truck before the engine needed repair.
 
Yes, exactly. The sad thing about this is the owner never knows when this happens. They may be driving for thousands of miles and not know they have an oil filter which is bypassing the oil around the filter.
Some people don't seem to care about leak gaps and torn media, which seems to be driven by some kind of fanboyism rationalization thing going on - seen it here many times. 🙃
 
Back
Top