Originally Posted By: BlueOvalFitter
Man, y'all are taking this oil filter thread WAY TOO SERIOUS! It's like you're trying to see whom has the most brain cells to "FLEX", like in a body building contest.
I'm not the smartest cookie in the jar, but I know that every oil filter that I have installed on an engine has never failed me yet. If y'all know all of this data about oil filters, then which brand of oil filter is GOOD ENOUGH for you to use? How can you even use an oil filter and think about all of this "BRAIN CELL FLEXING" data and not think it's good enough for your engine?
I will ask again....Is the PUROLATOR BOSS a good choice to use on an engine? If I were to go buy one and install it on my engine, would you "FLEX" your data at me as to why I shouldn't have used said filter?
There is bickering and then there is standing up for oneself against a person who can be somewhat of a bully. The Fram article from 2003 is clear, there aren't enough particles after 98.67% to be statistically relevant. According to them.
All I am doing is saying what they said, facts, and making the point if all the cos. would state at 98,7% and not round up or extrapolate, to get more sales from box advertising, we would have a better picture. Need more oil filter cut opens, less talking.
Man, y'all are taking this oil filter thread WAY TOO SERIOUS! It's like you're trying to see whom has the most brain cells to "FLEX", like in a body building contest.
I'm not the smartest cookie in the jar, but I know that every oil filter that I have installed on an engine has never failed me yet. If y'all know all of this data about oil filters, then which brand of oil filter is GOOD ENOUGH for you to use? How can you even use an oil filter and think about all of this "BRAIN CELL FLEXING" data and not think it's good enough for your engine?
I will ask again....Is the PUROLATOR BOSS a good choice to use on an engine? If I were to go buy one and install it on my engine, would you "FLEX" your data at me as to why I shouldn't have used said filter?
There is bickering and then there is standing up for oneself against a person who can be somewhat of a bully. The Fram article from 2003 is clear, there aren't enough particles after 98.67% to be statistically relevant. According to them.
All I am doing is saying what they said, facts, and making the point if all the cos. would state at 98,7% and not round up or extrapolate, to get more sales from box advertising, we would have a better picture. Need more oil filter cut opens, less talking.