Maxlife vs Durablend vs WB cold flow ??

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
453
Location
northeast
just wondering if a mistake on the valvoline website spec sheets...it says that maxlife(syn blend)in 5-20, 5-30,10-30 all have the same -42 cold flow pour point, while the durablend is -36 (5-20), -36 (5-30), -33( 10-30) and the WB is -36, -36, -33 as well... is this correct, and why would maxlife a "Thicker Oil" have a lower pour point then the durablend if it is correct??
 
It's probably because Maxlife has a higher percentage of a more robust synthetic base oil in the blend. I don't know if it still does, but the synthetic base oil in the Maxlife blend use to be PAO.
 
I have all three oil's and just wondering what I should put in for the winter in PA. going into a 2002 1.8L toyota and a 1997 1.6L toyota
 
Personally, I'd look at the cold-cranking specs as your decider.

In that regard, Durablend wins, hands-down:

Maxlife 5w30: 5800cp @-30C;

Durablend 5w30: 4800cp @-30C;

Valvoline 5w30 conventional: 5500cp @-30C

Pour-point isn't really a good indicator of how well an oil will perform.
 
Originally Posted By: lucerne06
I have all three oil's and just wondering what I should put in for the winter in PA. going into a 2002 1.8L toyota and a 1997 1.6L toyota
I was forced to go to a Valvoline quick change two winters ago, and went with WB because of price. I wasnt going to pay $60-$70 for a Max Life change. It was the middle of Feb in ohio, the Blazer was parked outside. No problems reguarding cold starts with WB.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom