Competition is a wonderful thing. We've got a Y we own and a 3 we lease but our next car will probably be a Rivian R2.Like we all said...they've caught up.
https://www.greencarreports.com/new...7csZUWlkk1e0-7KOYg_aem_dQDimCK0YOhpF0zKk0uz2Q
Now that mainstream vehicle brands offer EVs, people are liking them much more than the kit cars from Tesla.
Is this actually true, though? The 3 and Y can both be had under 40k and both are selling better than any other EVs out there, and it's not really close.I agree, and my posts have already said this in the past.
I get it. Tesla is a well engineered high-performance product, however to me personally and I’m sure many Americans it has an Econo box look at a luxury car price.
Unlike enthusiast forms such as this mainstream America wants grand looking SUV type products, even if they’re small SUVs. Americans do not have a love affair with four-door sedans.
I’ve always said to me Tesla will have a following just like the Volkswagen beetle did.
Also, I am not knocking the look of the vehicle, I’m just stating the obvious walk into a GM dealership (or any mainstream brand ) and get a glimpse of what America is buying. It is not a car in the shape of a four-door sedan, such as Tesla.
They really need to do something with their model line in order to compete and honestly I don’t think they have the capability to do so at this point
Q8 e-tron, yes. The i4 is half-assed, built on an ICE platform - you even have a massive, vestigial transmission tunnel in the back. The wife and I were ready to buy one - heck, even had colors picked out (green with brown interior) - until we drove the i4. The Mach-e is a great prototype but doesn't seem like a finished product, especially for the price. And the price is the biggest factor right now, with the 3 and Y coming in way cheaper than pretty much anything remotely competitive. You can get a 3 LR RWD under $40k OTD. At that pricr, it doesn't need to be perfect; there's just nothing competing with it there.This is in-line with my own experiences. I found the e-tron, Mach-e and i4 to be better cars than the Model 3 and Model S.
When it works, sure. The problem is when it doesn't. GM used mostly off-the-shelf outsourced components in Ultium and they can't get systems to talk to each other properly. Tesla, Rivian, and Lucid have all engineered their vehicles substantially from the ground up and aren't running into those issues. Their issues are more related to scaling production as opposed to the product just just not working.Everyone complains about legacy companies using legacy stuff, but the reality is, it is actually not a bad thing as it reduces the risk of a design problem, not able to sell enough to make up the R&D cost of a new design, and economy of scale when mixed in with a legacy car.
Better selling than anything else? Not close? Your losing me and the one car you mention taxpayers are kicking in $7,500 in cash to buy a Tesla yet these low cost cars still meet or beat it in sales. So I am unsure your meaning.Is this actually true, though? The 3 and Y can both be had under 40k and both are selling better than anything else out there, and it's not really close.
It makes sense. Why would I, as someone taking care of my family, spend thousands more on a product that's worse for my family? Reminds me of my wife's aunt who buys Hunts ketchup because she hated John Kerry. She's only hurting herself there - John Kerry (and Elon) don't care.We know what happens. Customers despise daddy musk and they still usually buy a Tesla. It's okay, I get it.
Sorry for not clarifying because I honestly thought it was super-obvious, but best-selling EVs, since we're in the EV forum in a thread about EVs. And your link 100% supports my point.Better selling than anything else? Not close? Your losing me
https://www.kbb.com/best-cars/most-popular-suvs/
Well honestly that doesnt make sense to me then.Sorry for not clarifying because I honestly thought it was super-obvious, but best-selling EVs, since we're in the EV forum in a thread about EVs. And your link 100% supports my point.
Those are US numbers. Here's WW, and it wasn't even close. What do you think would happen to the numbers if commercial sales were eliminated?Better selling than anything else? Not close? Your losing me and the one car you mention taxpayers are kicking in $7,500 in cash to buy a Tesla yet these low cost cars still meet or beat it in sales. So I am unsure your meaning.
https://www.kbb.com/best-cars/most-popular-suvs/
I mean, really?
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/g43553191/bestselling-cars-2023/
Is that actually true without the slider set to assume gas savings?Is this actually true, though? The 3 and Y can both be had under 40k and both are selling better than any other EVs out there, and it's not really close.
You pay sales tax, delivery, and fees on every $40k car. Why is that a stipulation on the Model Y? The only difference for me is that I don't live in a state that allows direct to consumer sales, so I buy the car in Illinois and then have to pay the taxes in Wisconsin.Is that actually true without the slider set to assume gas savings?
Show me a model Y under 40k and by "can be had" that includes sales tax, delivery, fees, and all the other add ons.
Which EVs are outselling the Tesla Model 3 and Model Y in the US?Well honestly that doesnt make sense to me then.
I know this is an EV thread but the EV is an automobile to me.
People promote Tesla being it was the only car with an electric engine, put it in its own class and call it best selling. Just not true. The company is going backwards in profits and profit margin and would be out of business if the government wasnt giving them $7,500 for each car Americans bought of theirs. even with this, it only has shown a profit for 3 years out of 15.
Well, hold onto you hat. Tesla with its 15 year head start is losing market share by the boatloads now that other makers are producing cars with electric engines. Im not anti Tesla at all. I stress NOT but just look at the numbers and wait until 2030 at the latest to see where they stand as GM and others build SUVs that Americans love. The market will be flush with EVs and the majority of the public will not own one as a primary car.
Tesla's car lineup is old and stale EXCEPT for the performance group who want that thrill. I mean, facts are an inconvenience to some. EVs are not taking over the market as the media suggested and every manufacturer has cut back plans and Tesla is getting hammered with unsold cars.
Just like you say "competition is a wonderful thing" well, gasoline is competition and its proving how resilient it is even with $7,500 being given away to sway buyers to an EV.
BTW- O assume you read the OP https://www.greencarreports.com/new...-brands-evs-have-passed-tesla-in-satisfaction
Yes, and Torrid provided the screenshot.Is that actually true without the slider set to assume gas savings?
Show me a model Y under 40k and by "can be had" that includes sales tax, delivery, fees, and all the other add ons.
Or anywhere?Which EVs are outselling the Tesla Model 3 and Model Y in the US?
Here is the lowest price on a Model Y right now, and is probably how I would buy one due to range (which is everything), etc. But I would not buy a Y until the refresh comes out. The changes are significant, like 95% new parts. The current Model Y is likely to continue to drop in price.Is that actually true without the slider set to assume gas savings?
Show me a model Y under 40k and by "can be had" that includes sales tax, delivery, fees, and all the other add ons.
nope. thats incorrect.Yes, and Torrid provided the screenshot.
Then buy a Model 3 if $40k is a hard line. I didn't know we were bickering about pennies over $40k.
Then you should check what pazqa said. also near $2000 isnt pennies.Then buy a Model 3 if $40k is a hard line. I didn't know we were bickering about pennies over $40k.