M1 EP 15W-50 Goes Group III

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi 427,

I understand your desire to know percentages, but there are scientific reasons why I can't go there. For example, just making up numbers here, let's say I see 60% Group III based on a raw area % readout. I am only looking at the components that eluted from the GC. If there were 15% "heavies" that didn't elute, such as the VI solids and organometalic detergents, then that 60% figure of visible Group III would drop to 51% of the finished formula. If Mobil uses 10% heavy PAOs that don't elute, then the figure goes to 45%. Then there are response factors for the various base oils, and base line judgments for defining the separation and integration of the peak areas. These could raise or lower the figure somewhat and can only be determined by careful calibration - a lot of work. If they drove the percentage down, then we could be looking at 30%. So in this example the Group III percent could range between 30% and 60% of the finished oil. This is NOT a range I am putting on M1, just an example to demonstrate the difficulty in making percentage statements.

Stating a percent range without calibration just isn't valid and could be misleading. I am willing to say that the Group III is easily the largest of the visible (eluted) base oils, i.e. more than the AN or base oil grade PAO (4 to 10 cSt) based on raw area %, or to say there is a "big slug" of Group III, but more specific than that gets unscientific.

The samples we ran of German Castrol Syntec Gold and Green show the small amounts of additive carrier oil we would expect in a finished synthetic oil, typically 5-10%. The M1 EP samples are a night & day difference by comparison.

Tom
 
Quote:


Yes, it is. To meet the demanding requirements of today's specifications (and our customers' expectations), Mobil 1 with SuperSyn uses high-performance fluids, including polyalphaolefins (PAOs), along with a proprietary system of additives. and selected additives in order to tailor the viscosity grade to its specific application.


Each Mobil 1 with SuperSyn viscosity grade uses a unique combination of synthetic fluids

Each grade probably does use varying amounts of different baseoils. For instance, the 0w-40 is probably all PAO.
 
I think Tom NJ deserves a lot of praise. As far as I can remember nobody here has done such a detailed study of the chemical components of a motor oil.

I have been interested in Mobil 1 since it first came out. When it did first come out Mobil said that it was synthetic except for a small amount of 'carrier oil' for the chemical additives. Apparently at that time it was harder to keep chemical additives in solution using synthetic oil and a small amount of mineral oil was needed. Later I heard that Mobil 1 was completely synthetic.

Now, apparently Group III oil is being included. Maybe it is even a good thing-maybe with the Group III the Mobil 1 is even better. I don't know. But if Mobil 1 is 45% or 55% Group III, and if synthetic oils like Chevron Synthetic have a comparable amount of Group III, it is confusing to me why Mobil 1 costs something like $6.00 a quart and you can get the other Group III synthetic oils cheaper. Maybe the additive package in Mobil 1 is far superior-who knows.

It is really nice to find out stuff like this-the Group III oil in the Mobil 1.
 
Quote:


If your unnecessarily veiled reference relates to Mobil Oil Co. and Castrol, nobody sued anybody. The matter was referred to binding arbitration by mutual agreement.




My, aren't you just the master of the obvious.
 
In reference to the 1999 NAD National Advertising Division ruling that redefined the use of the word "synthetic" in oils. Mobil alleged that Castrol degraded Syntec by substituting hydroprocessed mineral oil for PAO "which used to account for about 80% of it's base" oil to the detriment of the consumer. Mobil also contended that Castrol deceived it's consumers by not informing them of the change in formulation. M1 should list in percentages the quantity of the base oils used in their formulations, namely the PAO and Ester content.
 
Thanks Tom. I hope you didn't mind me "pushing" you, I just wanted to get as clear as picture as my dyslexic neurons would allow.
patriot.gif
 
G'day Tom, just want to add my thanks for the G.C. work on M1. To say it's an eye opener is an understatement
shocked.gif


BTW, any plans on checking Delvac 1 for ester content ?
wink.gif


cheers.gif
 
Hi TDI-Rick,

It is not on our radar at this time. EM makes numerous brands and grades of oil. I periodically track the M1 oil, not so much for the ester opportunity, but because EM is the bellwether of the synthetic motor oil industry and M1 is their flagship brand. Just keeps me up on synlube trends and provides some market intelligence.

Tom
 
Wow what a bomb shell.
crazy.gif
I step away for a few days and this thread gets started. I always wondered why the new M1 15w-50 Extended Performance HT/HS took a hit compared to the old Red Cap M1. It always struck me as being slightly odd. Maybe now I know why.
blush.gif
 
I also want to add my thanks to you Tom, and all the others, for your willingness to post information such as this. As a Mobil 1 user, I, like the other users of the Mobil 1 products, am dismayed, disappointed, and feel betrayed to hear this. I'll step back and review all this information, and in the end, decide whether I will want to pay the premium cost for a product that is not as special as I thought it was. Keep up the great work!!
 
Would I be correct in assuming that Tom's findings regarding M1 EP 15w-50 don't necessarily imply anything about Mobil1's other oils? In other words, should we assume that the Mobil1 (non-EP) oils such as their 0w-20, 5w-20, etc. are still group IV? Or are people assuming that all of Exxon Mobil's product line is now questionable regarding its base stock?
 
Quote:


Would I be correct in assuming that Tom's findings regarding M1 EP 15w-50 don't necessarily imply anything about Mobil1's other oils? In other words, should we assume that the Mobil1 (non-EP) oils such as their 0w-20, 5w-20, etc. are still group IV? Or are people assuming that all of Exxon Mobil's product line is now questionable regarding its base stock?




I don't think we can assume that until those grades/oils are tested.
 
Quote:


Or are people assuming that all of Exxon Mobil's product line is now questionable regarding its base stock?




That's how I personally feel re: it. Esp. since the M1EP were priced higher than the regular M1. Logic dictate it had to be of higher basis.
 
Bryan, go to the third post on page 3. Tom also tested M1 EP 5w30 SM and, IMO, the results are even more eye opening.
 
Last edited:
The mentality on BITOG has to shift. PAO is worshiped here like a ________, yet UOA after UOA showed that gr3 based Castrol oils would be as good (if not better) than gr4 based mobil 1. Last time I checked, pure PAO would promote corrosion in engine. Mixture of different base oils is the way to go and ME is doing exactly that. This is a step in positive direction.

Besides, additive pack is way more important than base oil. Most makers of synthetics oils would like the general public to be ignorant of that.
 
What I'd like to see is Tom run his tests on some Amsoil 5w30.
hornets_nest.gif


Pablo, how about donating a quart?
wink.gif
 
Quote:


Last time I checked, pure PAO would promote corrosion in engine.




And running pure/straight Grp III base oil, without rust inhibitors, in an engine, would not have the same problem?
grin.gif


The topic is the news of Grp III in M1 formulations - if you want to bash M1 & promote your favorite brand, why not start a new thread?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom