I mention SP GF-6B oil because very thin oils are saved not by MOFT, but by add pack. Does not high dose Moly mitigate loss from washing by fuel diluted oil ?
Millers Oils XF Premium Engine Oil 0W16 would work beautifully for our Euro friends.And in Europe Toyota hybrids are listed that they can run ACEA C2,3 and 5.
So Toyota thinks it is fine to run HTHS 3.5 and higher. But, Car nut guy…
Nah, what it says is that Car Nut can take that certification and burn it.Millers Oils XF Premium Engine Oil 0W16 would work beautifully for our Euro friends.
![]()
An oil that has no licenses nor approvals and isn’t even an SAE grade. Why would you suggest such a product?Millers Oils XF Premium Engine Oil 0W16 would work beautifully for our Euro friends.
![]()
Availability in Europe.An oil that has no licenses nor approvals and isn’t even an SAE grade. Why would you suggest such a product?
The answer is shorten the OCI. OP is fully capable of weighing the effects of his consistent hypermiling on his oil.I don't really care what it is, it could be a Murcielago, the issue isn't with the brand or model, it's with the level of fuel being observed, which is very similar to the issue Honda has been having and, in general, is a DI issue, though some are clearly more susceptible to severe manifestations of the issue than others. This is very severe!
So where we really disagree is viscosity. Accepted. But OP does want to continue hypermiling. That is his choice and would point to staying with 0W16 Advanced Fuel Economy.Yes... that's what we've been saying. The OP may also want to go with a slightly heavier oil if this level of dilution continues, just to keep viscosity within the range that Toyota has spec'd.
TBH oxidative thickening might be another issue where you got hyperbolic, just like fuel dilution. It seems the Wearcheck tech drives a 2007 Honda Fit (very apt re my Insight) and he was not at all concerned about the numbers. 5.7 vs 6.3.OK, but this is the completely opposite issue, so I'm not sure why you are bringing that up?
I will be sure to provide pictures should a rebuild be necessary.Well, that's unfortunate. It's an interesting experiment to watch.
I resent you qualifying my legitimate concerns as hyperbolic. If you'd like to continue to engage with me, I suggest toning down the patronization and attempted seeding of skepticism regarding legitimate issues I've brought to the fore.The answer is shorten the OCI. OP is fully capable of weighing the effects of his consistent hypermiling on his oil.
So where we really disagree is viscosity. Accepted. But OP does want to continue hypermiling. That is his choice and would point to staying with 0W16 Advanced Fuel Economy.
TBH oxidative thickening might be another issue where you got hyperbolic, just like fuel dilution. It seems the Wearcheck tech drives a 2007 Honda Fit (very apt re my Insight) and he was not at all concerned about the numbers. 5.7 vs 6.3.
I will be sure to provide pictures should a rebuild be necessary.![]()
You have accused me of such things as absurdity. Edit. I said you might have been hyperbolic in takes on both oxidative thickening AND fuel dilution.I resent you qualifying my legitimate concerns as hyperbolic. If you'd like to continue to engage with me, I suggest toning down the patronization and attempted seeding of skepticism regarding legitimate issues I've brought to the fore.
TGMO 0W16 by Mobil 1 has significantly increased dosage of moly SN+ vs SP.I mention SP GF-6B oil because very thin oils are saved not by MOFT, but by add pack. Does not high dose Moly mitigate loss from washing by fuel diluted oil ?
If I have done so, it is because I've had grounds on which to base those claims. I do not make it a habit of classifying people's contribution in a manner in which they might find offensive unless that is the case, and they've pushed the envelope with me to the point where I feel that is required.You have accused me of things.
But Nut Care Car guy?If I have done so, it is because I've had grounds on which to base those claims. I do not make it a habit of classifying people's contribution in a manner in which they might find offensive unless that is the case, and they've pushed the envelope with me to the point where I feel that is required.
You do not have any technical bases from which to critique my comments about fuel dilution, nor oxidation, let alone qualify them as being hyperbolic. Both of these are widely accepted as being legitimate issues, broadly, and you are pushing against the consensus here with your attempt at making a mockery of the concerns expressed by not only myself, but several other members in this thread.
Some industry reading on the issue of fuel dilution (what we are discussing in this thread):
Total:
Castrol (this is diesel, but the same concern applies):![]()
FUEL DILUTION OF ENGINE OIL: CAUSES AND EFFECTS
lubricants.totalenergies.com
Savant Labs:![]()
FUEL DILUTION AND ITS IMPACT ON ENGINE OIL | WELCOME | CASTROL USA
A customer recently contacted me to enquire about the flagging limits for fuel dilution used with our Castrol® Labcheck® used oil analysis program. After a discussion with the customer to find out why he was asking, he revealed that he has a new...www.castrol.com
Fluid Life (oil analysis) who condemns fuel dilution at 4%:Fuel Dilution -- The Cause, Effect, and Detection
Fuel Dilution is the thinning of engine oil by gasoline or diesel fuel. During the service life of the engine oil, some amount of fuel dilution is inevitable, but several factors can cause excessive dilution:www.savantlab.com
AZO Materials Labs:![]()
Fuel Dilution: Example, Effects and Recommendations - Fluid Life
When living in a world of information overload, what you need is actionable insight that guides you. Here's a fuel dilution example and our recommendations.www.fluidlife.com
And the freakin' SAE (you'd have to buy this though):![]()
Fuel Dilution in Engine Oil - How It Happens and What It Leads To
Fuel dilution of the engine oil is a problem that faces many modern combustion engines. Also known as “crankcase dilution” it is a process where fuel is leaked into engine oil when it travels towards the crankcase.www.azom.com
Impact of Fuel Injection on Dilution of Engine Crankcase Oil for Turbocharged Gasoline Direct-Injection Engines
Turbocharged gasoline direct injection (TGDI) engines often have a flat torque curve with the maximum torque covering a wide range of engine speeds. Increasing the high-speed-end torque for a TGDI engine provides better acceleration performance to the vehicle powered by the engine. However, it alsowww.sae.org
And from a paper:
3.3. Impact of Fuel and Water Content on the Anti-Wear Effectiveness of ZDDP
The impact of fuel and water contents on the performance of ZDDP was also studied. Figure 4 compares the friction behavior and wear rate of the ZDDP additized PAO without and with fuel (3%) or water (1%). The addition of ZDDP reduced the risk of scuffing failure for the PAO base oil, similarly to our previous experience [17,18]. The inclusion of fuel or water in the lubricant had little impact on the friction behavior but reduced the anti-wear effectiveness of ZDDP, as shown in Figure 4. The cross-sectional profiles of the wear tracks on cast iron are shown in Figure S3. Surface characterization revealed that the fuel and water content significantly affects the morphology and composition of the tribofilm produced by ZDDP, as described below.
View attachment 99559
So, not only does fuel dilution reduce MOFT, but it also has a negative impact on the effectiveness of ZDDP.
Like how solid? Rock solid? Pudding solid? And who recognizes them as solid? YouTube likes?Availability in Europe.
Millers Oils chart says SP. It is also recommended by Millers Oils for Toyotas. And Hondas.
Are the thickies getting grumpy ?
Not very useful.
And besmirching Millers Oils and Car Care Nut ? They are both generally recognized as solid.
So this whole thing comes down to finding balance and making a choice considering durability weighed alongside efficiency.
If SP is required to be more protective than SN, why the hangup about viscosity ?
Tacoma World gives Car Care Nut a thumbs up. And Millers Oils makes a VW C3 5W30 just for you, in addition to the evil witches brew 0W16. There have even been hand written letters of certification, from Wolfsburg to West Yorkshire.Like how solid? Rock solid? Pudding solid? And who recognizes them as solid? YouTube likes?
Toyota in these engines recommends C3 oils. That is where discussion stops whether somehow these oils can damage engines.
We all knew that, but Nut guy…
Pigeonholing members and casting labels like "thickies" is juvenile and unbecoming. Allusion to the potential for "good discussion" must be satirical given the labels being tossed around and flippant dismissal of industry recognition of the issue being discussed.I just read the Fluid Life stuff an hour ago as well as earlier today.
Monolithic.
A trademark of BITOG.
A wasted opportunity for good discussion.
But a debate win at least for the army of thickies.
So I ask you OVERKILL. What do you make of carmakers respective postures on fuel dilution and viscosity ? They do have to balance maintaining the value of their brands reputations for quality and durability with CAFE compliance. Why have tests for passing SP ? Is it ALL just complete bull hockey ? Is it all something that went right past factory engineers, tribologists ?