M1 10w30 in Honda

Status
Not open for further replies.
quote:

Originally posted by 2004 F150 4x4:
We've read similar comments about 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 times.

Yeah…. Proof that some people are real slow learners would’nt you say?
wink.gif


Yep, once these slow learners educate themselves and see the fault in their logic, they stop repeating it. However, we continually get new members with the same faulty reasoning.
grin.gif
 
quote:

Originally posted by Ugly3:

quote:

Originally posted by dave1251:
DANO M-1 10W-30 will work just fine in your Honda.
I have seen the MPG difference in my friends Ford Mustang and it averages around .012 more on an 5W-20 vs 5W-30. It really helps a manufactures CAFE rateing over 100,000's of cars. That is why honda recommends the 20 weight oil.


How is it you are in on the reason(s) Honda recommends 5w20 motor oil?


I already answered that question for you Ugly. If 5w-20 was the design lube for the original engine, it would have been specified for the original engine. It would also be specified for the same engines overseas. With said facts in mind, anybody with a brain and a little knowledge of CAFE can deduce that somebody came to the engineers and said, "Hey Ford is doing this light oil thing...., can we do that too to improve mileage without having our engines fail under warranty"? And they came back and said, "yeah.....we can if the lube meets this Ford specification. However, our conventional knowledge of hydrodynamic lubrication and experience cannot be discarded. We specified that same engines run 5W-30, 10W-30 and 10W-40 lubricants and time has proven that this was good advice as they seem to run forever with lubes. We also must understand that we may have bearing inlet viscositites under 5 or so centistokes in these engines in some operating conditions under some climates and both scientific studies and a fundamental knowledge of lubrication principles tell us that the very limits of being able to form a protective oil wedge are in proximity. We also know that small debris particles that normally do not cause scoring damage will now be unable to fit through the bearing clearance and thus will cause damage and embedment. We also know that we will be placing more demands on the anti-wear additives in the oil in the valvetrain where the camshaft lobes are already not getting a thick enough oil to allow for hydrodynamic full film lubrication in the first place. All in all, for most drivers, they will be fine till way past the warranty but will suffer more wear than they would with the proper or original design viscosities we already specified. However, wear is negligible with the regular viscosities so we still expect a relatively long life even when these rates go up. However, in very hot climates with longer duration trips and more aggressive driving styles, lifes will be cut by a much more significant margin. Those who make short trips only regardless of climate will simply enjoy excellent protection and improved mileage. As the owner's of Redline oil corporation said, we automotive lubricant engineers actually do run 5W-40, 10W-40, or 0W-40 lubricants in the summer if we make longer trips regardless of what we specifiy for the public. This should tell you something."
 
quote:

Originally posted by 427Z06:

quote:

Originally posted by 1911:
Ugly3, are you aware that the same exact engine a year or two before this recommended a thicker oil. Are you also aware that the same engine overseas in cooler climates than Texas also gets thicker oil recommendations? This tells a smart man that there must be a lot more to this picture than initially meets the eye. Honda does not really care if your car loses compression at 175k miles on it cause you'll just buy another one mate.

1911


Well, Honda has been recommending dino 5w30 in their cars from about 1986-88.

I wonder how all these Hondas accumulated these miles on dino 5w30? Or did they all totally ignore the owner's manual and start using MOBIL SUPER S 10W-40 because they had a long lost relative phone them from down under to clue them in?
grin.gif


427Z06, did you hear me say that 5W-30 would not work great?..........I don't recall saying that. That's waht I used to run in my civic until it was totalled. With those facts in mind.....could you please answer one question:

What is your point?
 
quote:

Originally posted by 1911:

quote:

Originally posted by 427Z06:

quote:

Originally posted by 1911:
Ugly3, are you aware that the same exact engine a year or two before this recommended a thicker oil. Are you also aware that the same engine overseas in cooler climates than Texas also gets thicker oil recommendations? This tells a smart man that there must be a lot more to this picture than initially meets the eye. Honda does not really care if your car loses compression at 175k miles on it cause you'll just buy another one mate.

1911


Well, Honda has been recommending dino 5w30 in their cars from about 1986-88.

I wonder how all these Hondas accumulated these miles on dino 5w30? Or did they all totally ignore the owner's manual and start using MOBIL SUPER S 10W-40 because they had a long lost relative phone them from down under to clue them in?
grin.gif


427Z06, did you hear me say that 5W-30 would not work great?..........I don't recall saying that. That's waht I used to run in my civic until it was totalled. With those facts in mind.....could you please answer one question:

What is your point?


You're a smart man, so I would expect you to figure it out. The clues are all there.
 
you guys should notice the trend here....Honda recommends 5w20 for those engines that don't rev to stratopheric range of 7000~8000rpm+...and only those engines that are not equipped with the "vanilla" DOHC VTEC high cam high lift

they still recommend 5w30 for RSX Type S (7900 redline), and S2000 (8000 and 9000 redline)
 
1911 - I already answered that question for you Ugly. If 5w-20 was the design lube for the original engine, it would have been specified for the original engine. It would also be specified for the same engines overseas. With said facts in mind, anybody with a brain and a little knowledge of CAFE can deduce that somebody came to the engineers and said, "Hey Ford is doing this light oil thing...., can we do that too to improve mileage without having our engines fail under warranty"?

In other words you have no direct or indirect knowledge of why Honda in recommending 5w20 motor oil, just guesses.
dunno.gif
 
quote:

Originally posted by Ugly3:


In other words you have no direct or indirect knowledge of why Honda in recommending 5w20 motor oil, just guesses.
dunno.gif


Here is the hard evidence. This is a PDF file.
Letter from the EPA about use of 5w20
I know this has been posted before but it needs repeating in order to clear things up. To summarize, 5w20 has absolutely nothing to do with engine design and everything to do with fuel economy test cycle run by the EPA.
 
quote:

Originally posted by jtantare:

quote:

Originally posted by Ugly3:


In other words you have no direct or indirect knowledge of why Honda in recommending 5w20 motor oil, just guesses.
dunno.gif


Here is the hard evidence. This is a PDF file.
Letter from the EPA about use of 5w20
I know this has been posted before but it needs repeating in order to clear things up. To summarize, 5w20 has absolutely nothing to do with engine design and everything to do with fuel economy test cycle run by the EPA.


Did you read the letter? The letter says Ford and then Honda came to the EPA recommending the use of 5w20 oil. The EPA did not go the Ford and Honda and demand they use 5w20.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Ugly3:
Did you read the letter? The letter says Ford and then Honda came to the EPA recommending the use of 5w20 oil. The EPA did not go the Ford and Honda and demand they use 5w20.

So what? If the EPA had initiated this all manufacturers would have to use 5w20. They wouldn't single out 2 car makers. Honda and Ford wanted to improve the fuel economy numbers on the window sticker by using 5w20. EPA laid out the guide lines of how they would have to go about it. So Honda and Ford are mandated by the EPA to tell you to only use this oil grade since they used this oil in the fuel economy test.
Did you read the whole letter?
 
quote:

Originally posted by Ugly3:
1911 - I already answered that question for you Ugly. If 5w-20 was the design lube for the original engine, it would have been specified for the original engine. It would also be specified for the same engines overseas. With said facts in mind, anybody with a brain and a little knowledge of CAFE can deduce that somebody came to the engineers and said, "Hey Ford is doing this light oil thing...., can we do that too to improve mileage without having our engines fail under warranty"?

In other words you have no direct or indirect knowledge of why Honda in recommending 5w20 motor oil, just guesses.
dunno.gif


I know exactly why they are recommending it for US vehicles. It leads to improved fuel economy and that's especially so for those who make primarily short trips where the oil is so thick in general and where the viscosity difference between the thinner and thicker oils in centistokes is the greatest.

Now Ugly, why do you think they are recommending it?.........I don't believe you have stated why you think it is that way yet. If you say that the engines were specifically designed around or for that type of lubricant, you should be laughed off this board since most of the engines were exactly the same before the new 5W-20s began to show up on the filler cap. Why would Honda have the Germans and Japs use thicker oils for engine designs where 5W-20 was optimal? I guess some people just would never make it as a detective.....they are simply unable to make a picture out of evidence. I've answered these questions, what's your explanation mate?

If you're smart, you'll pretty much have to come to the same conclusion that I did.....what other logical conclusion is possible?.....please do tell if you've got a better explanation for why the SOHC Honda four suddenly had a change in oil recommendations for the US only!!!
 
lol.gif



Well, let me throw this in for the mix
grin.gif


The major pillar of detractors to the use of 5w-20 is that (insert sissy voice) "but it's not spec'd in Europe like that!" or "it's not spec'd in BFE like that!".

We go under the assumption that it is (isv) "for CAFE" ..which may be true. Let's just turn that around. Suppose it's NOT used in any other environment simply because they have no reason to stiffle consumption? That is, since a significant amount of tax revenue is derived from petro fuel perchasing, that they have no desire (they're politicians too) to shave their life blood?? Europe in particular treats resources differently than we do. My Pukeout 504 spec'd motor oil for the trans ...it could use hypoid gear oil ..but the stuff was disproportionately expensive in Europe compared to motor oil
dunno.gif


The funny thing is, for the vast majority of BITOG membership, they often cite the "continental" model of higher visc ...but virtually never cling to the same European propensity toward longer drain intervals. These too can be considered a detractor for long engine life.

They never see that these two elements are possibly mated and just pluck the desired element out of the marriage for the convenience of the arguement.


Me? I just argue.
grin.gif
 
1911 - Well, I don’t know, I wasn’t in on the decision making process. There are a few things I do know.

Back in the 50’s and 60’s millions of engines were run on 20 weight oil. Those engines were “loose” by today’s standards, the 20 weight oil was “poor” by today’s standards, the cooling systems were poor by today’s standards, and the crankcase ventilation was “poor” at best. Still, the engines ran.

Mobil did a study in the early 70’s to determine the ideal motor oil viscosity. When Mobil 1 was introduced it was a 5w20 viscosity. It would not sell because it was viewed as being too thin so they reformulated to a thin 30 weight and sold 5w30 which became 5w20 after a short term of use. Bingo, marketing success and performance success.

Now, on to Honda specifically. Honda is not even close to EPA problems with CAFÉ, they are beating the CAFÉ standards in all portions of their fleet. I conclude from this that Honda does not have a “need” to get the small MPG benefit of going to 5w20 motor oils.

I repeat, I don’t “know” why Honda changed the oil recommendation to 5w20 but I will share my conjecture.

Honda knows the vast majority of their fleet will operate just fine on 5w20 motor oil that meets particular specs. There are some exceptions and they do not recommend 5w20 in those applications. Honda wants to be seen by the American public as an environmentally friendly company and saw the opportunity to get on the 5w20 bandwagon early and get whatever marketing advantage they could from the change.

On the other side of the coin, I can not imagine that Honda (or any other company) would recommend an inferior oil in order to get some miniscule MPG benefit at the expense of engine performance and durability. I realize that car company executives are not necessarily the brightest lights on the planet but there ain’t anyone that stupid.

In conclusion: I was there in the 50’s and 60’s when multi-vis oils were introduced. I saw the “experts” proclaim that this engineered oil was crap and if you use it your engine will blow up. I also saw the development of excellent multi-vis oils and watched the “experts” get drug “kicking and screaming” into the world of milti-vis oils. The road to progress is not a straight line to perfection (shades of 10w40), the technical people will continue to develop better oils and better engines, there will be bumps in the road but progress will be made.
 
Gary Allen - If I get your point correctly the car companies "could" introduce 5w20 (or some other viscosity oil) and claim the 1 or 2 MPG benefit. But then they would have to give up the long OCI they currently get with the higher viscosity oils.

Have I got it right?
 
Possibly. I'm just throwing that out there for consideration.

It's proven in more models than you can shake a stick at that conservation can achieve more than inovative technology. Hence they may use that theory for their "mind set" (insert German or, for that matter, French accent) "Let them drive less if they want to save money" (with nose somewhat turned up in the air).
 
quote:

I already answered that question for you Ugly. If 5w-20 was the design lube for the original engine, it would have been specified for the original engine. It would also .........

1911, Your post would scare me enough to run 20w50 in my civic if it wasn't for the fact that I haven't seen any of that wear in any uoa. Of course some say uoa's don't tell you a thing so ...
dunno.gif
 
quote:

Originally posted by Ugly3:
1911 - Well, I don’t know, I wasn’t in on the decision making process. There are a few things I do know.

Back in the 50’s and 60’s millions of engines were run on 20 weight oil. Those engines were “loose” by today’s standards, the 20 weight oil was “poor” by today’s standards, the cooling systems were poor by today’s standards, and the crankcase ventilation was “poor” at best. Still, the engines ran.

Mobil did a study in the early 70’s to determine the ideal motor oil viscosity. When Mobil 1 was introduced it was a 5w20 viscosity. It would not sell because it was viewed as being too thin so they reformulated to a thin 30 weight and sold 5w30 which became 5w20 after a short term of use. Bingo, marketing success and performance success.

Now, on to Honda specifically. Honda is not even close to EPA problems with CAFÉ, they are beating the CAFÉ standards in all portions of their fleet. I conclude from this that Honda does not have a “need” to get the small MPG benefit of going to 5w20 motor oils.

I repeat, I don’t “know” why Honda changed the oil recommendation to 5w20 but I will share my conjecture.

Honda knows the vast majority of their fleet will operate just fine on 5w20 motor oil that meets particular specs. There are some exceptions and they do not recommend 5w20 in those applications. Honda wants to be seen by the American public as an environmentally friendly company and saw the opportunity to get on the 5w20 bandwagon early and get whatever marketing advantage they could from the change.

On the other side of the coin, I can not imagine that Honda (or any other company) would recommend an inferior oil in order to get some miniscule MPG benefit at the expense of engine performance and durability. I realize that car company executives are not necessarily the brightest lights on the planet but there ain’t anyone that stupid.

In conclusion: I was there in the 50’s and 60’s when multi-vis oils were introduced. I saw the “experts” proclaim that this engineered oil was crap and if you use it your engine will blow up. I also saw the development of excellent multi-vis oils and watched the “experts” get drug “kicking and screaming” into the world of milti-vis oils. The road to progress is not a straight line to perfection (shades of 10w40), the technical people will continue to develop better oils and better engines, there will be bumps in the road but progress will be made.


Well written Ugly3 and some good information was presented by you here for sure. I don't think anybody here believes that engineering considerations were neglected when a decision was made to go to 5W-20. We would already have had a lot of failures if 5W-20 was a ridiculous and negligent choice.

I personally believe the old car information is largely misleading for several reasons.

1) Have you ever looked at the front of a 1973 Plymouth Valiant and then looked at a 1994 Honda Civic? You cannot even see the radiator on the civic but the Valiant has a big squared off one with a big grill.

2) Engines actually get a good bit (or used to at least) of their cooling from airflow under the car. It has been cut dramatically for aerodynamic efficiency and to reduce car lifting due to the airfoil effect (longer path equals lower pressure) at higher speeds. THis has been a problem for gearbox manufacturers.

3) Specific outputs are two to six times higher than the fifties and this means a lot more heat energy produced per a given amount of metal, water volume, engine surface area (see Brother Molekules excellent posts on this for the oil pan itself), etc. This along with items 1 and 2 means higher oil temperatures today!!!!!! Look at the numberes some of the dudes on this board
are measuring with some aggressive driving!!!! You couldn't produce 275F-300F in the fifties unless your cooling system was broke.

4)Higher specifica outputs also often transcribe to higher loads at the bearings which are not always compensated for (versus the 50's designs) with larger bearings (to keep the pressures the same). I bet the pressures are much higher now.
Check the bearing size of an old old Chevy V-8 and then compare to a current one of the same size.

5) Most on this board continually fail to understand what even 25 extra degrees F does to the viscosity. It is dramatically underestimated Ugly and you (not to point a finger) are one of the guilty party here. These little Honda four bangers probably run 40F- 80F higher oil temperatures than their 50's counterparts. IS that not worth a grade or two mate........? My charts say it is!!!!...your's are evidently not available.

1911
 
1911 - I will agree to disagree with you. I think Honda knows the engine operating temps while 100F in a traffic jam as well as operating at 80 MPH on the hiway. I think Honda knows the bearing clearances and loads on their engines. I think Honda knows the capability of their cooling systems. I think Honda knows the capability of the recommended oil.

As for the "old" data from the 50's and 60's - all I can remember is that when there was a traffic jam with 100F temps there would be 3 or 4 cars a mile on the side with steam streaming from under the hood. Almost never see that today with the current cooling systems.
 
Some other points to consider:

Take your average GF-1/GF-3 5w30. Take out some of the VII. What would you have?

OK. The last "connect the dots" post for this thread.

http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001222
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001322
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001412
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001439
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001478
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001490
http://theoildrop.server101.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001534
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001619
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001632
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001667
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001745
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001778
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001835
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=001875
http://theoildrop.server101.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=002048
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=002227
http://theoildrop.server101.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=002271
http://theoildrop.server101.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=002305
http://theoildrop.server101.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=002334
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=002349
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=002374
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=002382
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=002421
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=002430
http://theoildrop.server101.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=002435
http://theoildrop.server101.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=002439
http://theoildrop.server101.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=002449

What do all those dino 5w30 UOAs have in common?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom