This feels way more like an advertisement than even the first R&P video. Hard to take people seriously when they do stuff like this.
Here's a summary:
Despite never looking into the engine, Lake jr shows how the dipstick has less crud on it, and thus uses this as conclusive proof R&P lives up to its name.
Based on a UOA of 5000 miles for R&P and a 10k UOA for TGMO 0w-20, which are almost identical wear, Lake Jr claims R&P absolutely "protects". I just saved you 9 minutes.
The only thing conclusive about this oil from the video: It is non inferior in "protection" to 0w-20 Toyota oil. In a sample size of 1.
All the hype over this really makes me think twice about this oil. And I've used two jugs of it myself.
Example of what I mean by the marketing. From valvolines own website. One of dozens of reviews exactly like this. Now videos? LSJ went on a crusade against marketing hype in some of his other videos. What happened?
View attachment 251747