Originally Posted By: fdcg27
The Crown Vics all had valve guide seal problems after 150K or so, and the oldest was a '97.
Minor things like the AC and the radiators required replacement, along with age items like brake lines, transmission cooler lines and so on.
We have a very savvy full time tech, along with a not our own money budget, so fixing things isn't a big issue for us.
It would be for you.
Between the two in typical, non abusive use, I'd probably pick the Crown Vic for its safety and power advanatges alone.
The Taurus is a very durable car, though.
Fuel economy in typical use is close to a wash, since the Vulcan in the Taurus doesn't make great MPG numbers to go along with its lack of power.
Drive a 4.6 Crown Vic for a while, though, and you'll wonder how the cops caught the average 4 cyl Accord, much less a really fast car.
And yeah, I've drive a couple of CVPIs, which left me really unimpressed.
No way you'd keep up with a V-6 Accord, but then the radio is always faster than any car, and it'll cost you to get out of an eluding charge.
The valve seals were fixed long ago (10+ years), and even if they DO go, a Vic will run 200,000 miles with bad seals. If you get tired of the morning smoke-puff, I recall guide seals are a 3-hour job. Any Panther is a 300,000-miler with even half-baked maintenance. I have driven several over 500K.