Originally Posted By: BrocLuno
Go on craigslist with your son and see what sparks his interest...
You are competing with the field workers for reliable used cars. No matter where you look around us.
Once in a while something comes up in Monterey ...
In SF you will get dot.com hand me downs, but they can cost to fix...
Anywhere there is AG work, you are competing with AG workers who are all looking for what you are looking for ...
Find four or five car/SUV's he's interested in and get with the program. Go together on test drives. Listen to his comments.
The best search areas for us are greater Sacto area and Vaccaville/Fairfield. Lots of commuters into the Bay Area so they rack up the miles w/o much real wear. Yeah, it's a tough outing going through Bay Area traffic to go see a car, but it's bonding time. AND, if he won't go for a 2 hour ride to see a car, you don't need to consider it ...
I'd be looking at 1990's stuff. But make sure he's got some skin in the game, or it will be abused and left on the side of the road dead ... I speak from personal experience - mine to my folks, and the boy to us years ago ...
The safety talk presupposes that he'll wreck it. Prolly true. But there are two ways to deal with that, crumple zones and mass. A wrecked 1990's Chevy PU will absorb a lot and stay intact. So will a Saab. You can prolly fix the Chevy. The Saab will be gone to the wreckers for sure. Once modern stuff is bent, it's toast. Older SUV's - not so much
I will happily take my chances in my 88 Big Bronco vs any Corrola/Civic out there ... Ditto the F-150
Old heavy vehicles built when gas was cheap are a horrible recommendation. We have a 97 sierra with a 305 that I'm pretty sure gets single digit mpg but it has a 100 litre tank. I think the old "bigger is better" argument is weak when you consider that new cars are often heavier than old ones because of the added structure and systems to make them safer. There's that video with the 59 chevy going head on with a modern car and getting absolutely crushed.
I think that involving him that much in the decision is not that good of an idea. Who cares what he thinks, he has never driven before. What good would his opinion be on anything other than looks? He'll drive anything just to have wheels. A two hour car trip seems like nothing, but when this is the 5th two hour car trip and both of them are tired of wasting an evening/weekend day to look at some stupid car that is nothing like the seller claims is going to anger both of them and cause resentment.
Go on craigslist with your son and see what sparks his interest...
You are competing with the field workers for reliable used cars. No matter where you look around us.
Once in a while something comes up in Monterey ...
In SF you will get dot.com hand me downs, but they can cost to fix...
Anywhere there is AG work, you are competing with AG workers who are all looking for what you are looking for ...
Find four or five car/SUV's he's interested in and get with the program. Go together on test drives. Listen to his comments.
The best search areas for us are greater Sacto area and Vaccaville/Fairfield. Lots of commuters into the Bay Area so they rack up the miles w/o much real wear. Yeah, it's a tough outing going through Bay Area traffic to go see a car, but it's bonding time. AND, if he won't go for a 2 hour ride to see a car, you don't need to consider it ...
I'd be looking at 1990's stuff. But make sure he's got some skin in the game, or it will be abused and left on the side of the road dead ... I speak from personal experience - mine to my folks, and the boy to us years ago ...
The safety talk presupposes that he'll wreck it. Prolly true. But there are two ways to deal with that, crumple zones and mass. A wrecked 1990's Chevy PU will absorb a lot and stay intact. So will a Saab. You can prolly fix the Chevy. The Saab will be gone to the wreckers for sure. Once modern stuff is bent, it's toast. Older SUV's - not so much
I will happily take my chances in my 88 Big Bronco vs any Corrola/Civic out there ... Ditto the F-150
Old heavy vehicles built when gas was cheap are a horrible recommendation. We have a 97 sierra with a 305 that I'm pretty sure gets single digit mpg but it has a 100 litre tank. I think the old "bigger is better" argument is weak when you consider that new cars are often heavier than old ones because of the added structure and systems to make them safer. There's that video with the 59 chevy going head on with a modern car and getting absolutely crushed.
I think that involving him that much in the decision is not that good of an idea. Who cares what he thinks, he has never driven before. What good would his opinion be on anything other than looks? He'll drive anything just to have wheels. A two hour car trip seems like nothing, but when this is the 5th two hour car trip and both of them are tired of wasting an evening/weekend day to look at some stupid car that is nothing like the seller claims is going to anger both of them and cause resentment.