Long filter -VS- Shortie -- PSI Diff?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
223
Location
S. Colo
Hi, again. You may know from another thread that I'll be trying out Purolator Pure One filters soon.

The following observations were both with Wix filters:

Vehicle: 1998 Buick LeSabre with N/A Gen II 3800.

With Valvo 10w30 dino oil and the stock shortie Wix oil filter, HIOP (hot idle oil pressure in drive) is 35 psi. At 2200 cruise, 45 psi. Both ok and unexceptional.

I found that a considerably longer filter will fit perfectly from a 1998 Chev Blazer S-10 4x4 with 4.3 v-6.

Following UIM/LIM, I've cycled the car quickly thru 3 oil changes. The last change was after 200 miles done 2 days ago.

This 3rd change was done with the long Chevy Blazer style Wix filter, I immediately noticed some changes in indicated oil pressure. HIOP is 40 up from 35, 2200 hot cruise went up from 45 to 55 indicated.

Questions:

1.) Has anyone else seen higher indicated oil pressure with the bigger oil filters? Have you seen lower? Or no change?

2.) Do you think it makes a hill of beans of difference for long term engine life?

3.) Your opinion: Are long filter swaps really only needed on sludgers?


Disclaimer: Factory electric gauge, so accuracy and linearity are certainly questionable.


Thanks again,


Larry S.
Retired ASE Cert MM
 
I run a longer filter on every car that will take one. I run a PL3001 on my Cherokee, and I run the filter spec'd for the 2.4L turbo on my wife's non-turbo 2.4. I run the PL3001 on my small- and big-block Mopars whether or not they originally spec'd the PL3001 equivalent or the "shorty" version of same.

Picking the wrong long filter might give you the wrong bypass pressure, but so long as you pick the correct one the only thing you might see is a *slight* increase in hot oil pressure due to less restriction over the larger media surface area. 10 PSI at hot cruise is sorta a lot, but there are SO many variables to consider (fresh vs. old oil, actual oil temperature, etc.) that its really hard to draw a fair comparison.
 
I have all GM's and they all spec pf47 but one, but have used a pf52(longer) on them for years,no pressure change at all,better flow,more oil capacity,better filtration, win, win.

that 3800 is NOT a sludger,i've owned 3 now.
 
Originally Posted By: daman
I have all GM's and they all spec pf47 but one, but have used a pf52(longer) on them for years,no pressure change at all,better flow,more oil capacity,better filtration, win, win.

that 3800 is NOT a sludger,i've owned 3 now.


Hi, Daman. Thank you for your input. When I had this 3800 apart, it had what I'd call about average sludge for an engine with 104,000 miles. I cleaned out what I could and put in a new oil pickup screen.

The oil pressure really snaps up fast when cold now. I'll throw some decent OCI's and oil/filters at it and see what I get.

Family members get well over 200k out of the GM Gen II 3800's and they are still going strong. So I have hopes.

Sure does get great gas mileage, hasn't used a drop of oil and has great power for a super low buck used car. And a cream puff that's never been smoked in, to boot. (I'm allergic)

Have a great weekend,

Larry S.
 
you sure it wasn't varnish you were seeing? ive had N/A 3800's and SC 3800's,some apart for the LIM gasket repair and they have been clean,but i do run synthetics.

still these engines are not known for sludge,could you of had an abused one?
 
Originally Posted By: daman
you sure it wasn't varnish you were seeing? ive had N/A 3800's and SC 3800's,some apart for the LIM gasket repair and they have been clean,but i do run synthetics.

still these engines are not known for sludge,could you of had an abused one?


Daman,

I have to guess about it, but I think it did see some abuse as you similarly suspect. I have also seen inside some other 3800's so I also do not believe the engine itself is a sludger.

Some of the abuse I know it suffered: The PCV valve was the worst slimed up mess I've ever seen in my life. I believe it had not been replaced in the 104k miles since new. That's abuse - plain and simple. That the car wasn't burning oil was a miracle.

In addition: If I had to guess, I'd say they may have been running some lesser dino oil past it's mileage limits. Or, it could be that their driving routing never warmed the engine up though I didn't see the other signs of that.

There was some varnish as you suspected. In addition, though, I saw some off white jelled oil (?) in 3 places in the back valve cover. Guessing condensate maybe from recently ingested coolant from the EGR passage beginning to seep in the UIM. Or maybe condensate from not getting fully warmed up.

The oil pan had some goopy sludge in the bottom of it. It looked like maybe someone had run a flush solution or something and that brought the goop down.

While I had the pan off, I found that the oil pump pickup certainly was NOT plugged or anything, but was "partially gooped" with this slime. I attributed that to it having a super fine screen mesh in it.

So I replaced the screen assembly with a new one from CarQuest. Had to order it in from Denver. It had a normal screen mesh in it about like you'd expect for an old small block chevy screen instead of the super fine mesh. And, it had a lot deeper cup to it than the stocker. Not sure if that really helps or not. HOWEVER - when super cold here (and it gets super cold) - the oil pressure gauge snaps up to pressure MUCH more quickly now than it did before dropping the pan.

For the record, the only reason I removed the pan and valve covers in the first place was because the gaskets has gone flat and were leaking. I put in the new Fel-Pro Perma-Dry pan gasket. I did clean out most of the sludge I could get to while I had it apart.

There were certainly not huge buildups of sludge.

I think perhaps some of the "goopy" stuff in the oil pan was because the threaded block in the pan for the oil drain plug is located up quite a bit. After draining, when I took down the pan it had a least 1/2 quart of this stuff in the bottom.

Well, if the pan doesn't totally drain itself, that could contribute to it.

YMMV since I suspect where this threaded block gets resistance welded into the pan can vary, too.

I don't think anything was there that was going to cause any big problems. But I still didn't like it.

I have an old shop vac that I use for slimy wet jobs. So I took a tubing bender and shaped some copper 5/16" tubing into a J shaped hook and duct taped it to one of the older smaller nozzles for the shop vac.

So anyway, after the UIM/LIM refit, I was jumpy about making sure all contaminants got out so after the hot oil drain, I used the J hook nozzle to vacuum out the pan through the drain plug hole.

It was interesting - the copper tubing turned pretty hot to the touch whenever it was sucking out the remaining hot oil. After it had cleared, the tubing cooled off pretty quickly. From almost to hot to touch to more like luke warm.

This has risks, too, of course. Scraping off copper debris into the pan due to the drain plug hole threads... or inadvertently introducing contaminants if the J hook isn't totally clean.

Anyway, this hare-brained scheme was, once again, because I was jumpy about coolant contamination maybe being in the oil following the procedure.


So anyway, I think you nailed it. My humble opinion agrees with your own. That is, the engine design is NOT a sludger; it's more likely that my engine saw some individualized abuse.


I really looked the car over well before I bought it and showed the guy all the leaks and likely problems. It was a calculated gamble. Part of the reason I bought it even with the risks was my Dad has owned 2 of the Gen II cars and they have been "rock of gibraltar" tough. So I thought it would probably be ok.

It's way better than ok. Since getting rid of all the leaks during the UIM/LIM, there is no oil leakage or consumption. The power is great. I think it appreciates the new PCV valve, too!
wink.gif


It's dirty enough inside that I'm a little spooky about putting the new PP 5w30 in it, but input from BITOG 3800 owners - yourself included - has put me at ease.

I'll continue to accelerate the OCI's until I think it's cleaned out. If for any reason hot idle oil pressure drops below baselines, I'll drop the pan and clean it out - though I doubt this will be necessary.

The point is, if necessary, I'll do the work before letting such a super engine get hurt.

Thank you once again for your continuing input! I can see why the 3800's have such a cult following! I just joined that cult!

As an aside, I've owned 52 cars of various makes and models. Part of that was growing up in a gearhead environment. Anyway, I'm not easily impressed. But I really like the 3800's!

Larry S.

10*B
 
yea with your last post i'd say it was neglected to a degree and ran on a conventional longer then recommended OCI,because non of mine experienced what you explained.

i agree GM makes some good engines despite there gasket issues,thats all i ever owned and will own,heck we bought out last 2002 Montana Van knowing the IMG gasket was bad on the 3400 v6,brought it home 2 days later after parts cleaning and reassemble it was up and running strong,that was 60,000 miles ago,great great van.
 
Originally Posted By: daman
yea with your last post i'd say it was neglected to a degree and ran on a conventional longer then recommended OCI,because non of mine experienced what you explained.

i agree GM makes some good engines despite there gasket issues,thats all i ever owned and will own,heck we bought out last 2002 Montana Van knowing the IMG gasket was bad on the 3400 v6,brought it home 2 days later after parts cleaning and reassemble it was up and running strong,that was 60,000 miles ago,great great van.


Daman,

Exact same intentions here. My Dad had brought me up to speed on the main TSB's before I started looking for a 3800 car. I told him this one I just bought is a "kit car". That is, put in some work and a few parts and have a super reliable car for cheap.

It took me a little longer to get motivated and get it done, though. Excuses, always. Glad it's finally done!

Sounds like your Montana was a great find, same plan.

Well, I've gotta' go clean up the garage from the last phase of the UIM/LIM thing. Been puttin' that off, too.

Kind regards,

Larry S.
 
Originally Posted By: 10bears
Originally Posted By: daman
yea with your last post i'd say it was neglected to a degree and ran on a conventional longer then recommended OCI,because non of mine experienced what you explained.

i agree GM makes some good engines despite there gasket issues,thats all i ever owned and will own,heck we bought out last 2002 Montana Van knowing the IMG gasket was bad on the 3400 v6,brought it home 2 days later after parts cleaning and reassemble it was up and running strong,that was 60,000 miles ago,great great van.


Daman,

Exact same intentions here. My Dad had brought me up to speed on the main TSB's before I started looking for a 3800 car. I told him this one I just bought is a "kit car". That is, put in some work and a few parts and have a super reliable car for cheap.

It took me a little longer to get motivated and get it done, though. Excuses, always. Glad it's finally done!

Sounds like your Montana was a great find, same plan.

Well, I've gotta' go clean up the garage from the last phase of the UIM/LIM thing. Been puttin' that off, too.

Kind regards,

Larry S.


Yup gota good deal on it because it needed this repair,i knew exactly how much i would have into it because ive done this repair many times before,so i threw out a low ball offer they took it, the wifes been happy ever since,lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom